Lens or Prism? Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows from Public Research

References

• Agrawal A, Henderson R. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):44–60Link, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Gittelman M. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(4):774–779Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Gittelman M, Sampat BN. Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy (2009) 38(2):415–427Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ. Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Allison JR, Lemley MA. Empirical evidence on the validity of litigated patents. AIPLA Quart. J. (1998) 26(3):185–275Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Ceccagnoli M, Cohen WM. R&D and the patent premium. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2008) 26(5):1153–1179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J, Brown C, Mathiowetz N, Heckman JJ, Leamer EE. Measurement error in survey data. Handbook of Econometrics (2001) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 3705–3843Google Scholar
• Branstetter L, Ogura Y. Is academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? Evidence from patent citations. (2005) . NBER Working Paper 11561, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, Crainiceanu CM. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models (2006) Second ed.(Chapman & Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):157–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Florida R, Randazzese L, Walsh J, Noll RG. Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. Challenges to Research Universities (1998) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) 171–199Google Scholar
• Duguet E, MacGarvie M. How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2005) 14(5):375–393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):909–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman DD, Landes WM, Posner RA. Some economics of trade secret law. J. Econom. Perspect. (1991) 5(1):61–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M, Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logit of citation patterns. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):366–382Link, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81(3):511–515Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1998) 80(1):119–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hicks D. Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Indust. Corporate Change (1995) 4(2):401–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horstmann I, Macdonald GM, Slivinski A. Patents as information-transfer mechanisms—to patent or (maybe) not to patent. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(5):837–858Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Fogarty MS, Banks BA. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):183–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Fogarty MS, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M. The meaning of patent citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western Reserve study of patentees. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 379–401Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampe R. Strategic citation. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2012) 94(1):320–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemley MA, Sampat B. Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2012) 94(3):817–827Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacGarvie M. Do firms learn from international trade? Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(1):46-60Google Scholar
• Merton RK. Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1957) 22(6):635–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Ziedonis AA. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Res. Policy (2002) 31(3):399–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA. Learning to patent: Institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of U.S. university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981–1992. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):73–89Link, Google Scholar
• Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Res. Policy (1997) 26(3):317–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science BoardScience and Engineering Indicators 2012 (2012) (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA) Google Scholar
• Pavitt K. What makes basic research economically useful. Res. Policy (1991) 20(2):109–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peri G. Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2005) 87(2):308–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N, Clark KB, Hayes RH, Lorenz C. The commercial exploitation of science by American industry. The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma (1985) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 19–51Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy (1990) 19(2):165–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N, Nelson RR. American universities and technological advance in industry. Res. Policy (1994) 23(3):323–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM. The propensity to patent. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1983) 1(1):107–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):756–770Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Agrawal A. Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. (2011) 57(1):129–150Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Fleming L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res. Policy (2004) 33(10):1615–1634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby J, Fuller AW, Thursby M. U.S. faculty patenting: Inside and outside the unviersity. Res. Policy (2009) 38(1):14–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby JG, Thursby MC. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):90–104Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(1):290–306Google Scholar