A Dynamic Level-k Model in Sequential Games

References

• Aumann R. Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 8(1):6–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K, McCarthy J, Ponti G, Samuelson L, Shaked A. A backward induction experiment. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104:48–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown GW, Koopmans TC. Iterative solutions of games by fictitious play. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation (1951) (Wiley, New York) 374–376Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Ho T-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):837–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong J-K. A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Johnson EJ, Sen S, Rymon T, Binmore K, Kirman A, Tani P. Cognition and framing in sequential bargaining for gains and losses. Frontiers of Game Theory (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 27–48Google Scholar
• Charness G, Levin D. The origin of the winner's curse: A laboratory study. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics (2009) 1(1):207–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford V. Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(5):1737–1768Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Weizsacker G. Stated beliefs and play in normal-form games. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2008) 75(3):729–762Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa-Gomes M, Crawford V, Broseta B. Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica (2001) 69(5):1193–1235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford V, Iriberri N. Fatal attraction: Salience, naivete, and sophistication in experimental hide-and-seek games. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007a) 97(5):1731–1750Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Iriberri N. Level-k auctions: Can a non-equilibrium model of strategic thinking explain the winner's curse and overbidding in private-value auctions? Econometrica (2007b) 75(6):1721–1770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):817–868Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fey M, McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR. An experimental study of constant-sum centipede games. Internat. J. Game Theory (1996) 25(3):269–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Levine D. Theory of Learning in Games (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Guth W, Tietz R. Ultimatum bargaining behavior a survey and comparison of experimental results. J. Econom. Psych. (1990) 11(3):417–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1982) 3(4):367–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harless DW, Camerer C. The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica (1994) 62(6):1251–1289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Camerer C, Chong J-K. Self-tuning experience-weighted attraction learning in games. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 133(1):177–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Camerer C, Weigelt K. Iterated dominance and iterated best response in experimental P-beauty contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(4):947–969Google Scholar
• Johnson E, Camerer C, Sen S, Rymon T. Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(1):16–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Milgrom P, Roberts J, Wilson R. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):245–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA, Sadoff SE. Checkmate: Exploring backward induction among chess players. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(2):975–990Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKelvey RD, Palfrey TR. An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica (1992) 60(4):803–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagel R. Unraveling in guessing games: A experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(5):1313–1326Google Scholar
• Nagel R, Tang F. Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: An investigation in learning. J. Math. Psych. (1998) 42(2–3):356–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neelin J, Sonnenschein H, Spiegel M. A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(4):824–836Google Scholar
• Palacios-Huerta I, Volij O. Field centipedes. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(4):1619–1635Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RW. Games of perfect information, predatory pricing and the chain-store paradox. J. Econom. Theory (1981) 25(1):92–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):97–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selten R. The chain store paradox. Theory Decision (1978) 9(2):127–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D. Boundedly rational rule learning in a guessing game. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 16(2):303–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D, Wilson P. On players' models of other players—Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 10(1):218–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl I. Bargaining Theory (1972) (Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm) Google Scholar