Tiers in One-Sided Matching Markets: Theory and Experimental Investigation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1646

References

  • Abdulkadiroglu A, Sönmez T. House allocation with existing Tenants. J. Econom. Theory (1999) 88(2):233–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, He C. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs: A strategic analysis. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):472–487LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Rapoport A. Collaborative product and market development: A theoretical and experimental investigation. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):396–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Ho T-H, Krishna A, Chen K-Y, Desai P, Iyer G, Jain S, Lim N, Morgan J, Oprea R, Srivastava J. Experiments on strategic choice and markets. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3–4):417–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Ho T-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 67(4):827–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer CF, Ho T-H, Chong J-K. Sophisticated experienced-weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(1):137–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carrillo JD, Singhal S. Tiered housing allocation: An experimental analysis. (2011) . Discussion Paper DP8255, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Gneezy U. Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: An experiment. Econom. Inquiry (2010) 48(1):133–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Karni E, Levin D. Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance. J. Risk Uncertainty (2007) 35(2):129–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Sönmez T. Improving efficiency of on-campus housing: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1669–1689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Sönmez T. An experimental study of house allocation mechanisms. Econom. Lett. (2004) 83(1):137–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Sönmez T. School choice: An experimental study. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 127:202–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen C, Benjamin M. Alcoholics and liver transplantation. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (1991) 265(10):1299–1301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature (2009) 47(2):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekel E, Lipman BL, Rustichini A. Representing preferences with a unique subjective state space. Econometrica (2001) 69(4):891–934CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwyer PD, Gilkeson JH, List JA. Gender differences in revealed risk taking: Evidence from mutual fund investors. Econom. Lett. (2002) 76(2):151–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ. Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2008) 68(1):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield TA. Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health, Risk Soc. (2000) 2(2):159–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischbacher U. z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. (2007) 10(2):171–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree JK, Holt CA. A model of noisy introspection. Games Econom. Behav. (2004) 46(2):365–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree JK, Holt CA, Palfrey TR. Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games Econom. Behav. (2003) 45(1):97–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haruvy E, Roth AE, Ünver MU. The dynamics of law clerk matching: An experimental and computational investigation of proposals for reform of the market. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2006) 30(3):457–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(4):393–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T-H, Lim N, Camerer CF. Modeling the psychology of consumers and firms using behavioral economics. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):307–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt CA, Laury SK. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1644–1655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt CA, Laury SK. Risk aversion and incentive effects: New data without order effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(3):902–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kagel JH, Roth AE. The dynamics of reorganization in matching markets: A laboratory experiment motivated by a natural experiment. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(1):201–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreps DM. A representation theorem for preference for flexibility. Econometrica (1979) 47:565–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna A, Ünver MU. Improving the efficiency of course bidding at business schools: Field and laboratory studies. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):262–282LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman DR, Weinberg CB. Sales through sequential distribution channels: An application to movies and videos. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):18–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim N. Social loss aversion and optimal contest design. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(4):777–787CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinney CN, Niederle M, Roth AE. The collapse of a medical clearinghouse (and why such failures are rare). Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(3):878–889CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Roth AE. Unraveling reduces mobility in a labor market: Gastroenterology with and without a centralized match. J. Political Econom. (2003) 111(6):1342–1352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pierce J. Discover the secrets the pros use when exchanging timeshares to get the best resorts in the RCI Directory! (2012) . Accessed July 25, 2012, http://www.thetimeshareexpert.com/rcisecrets.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Powell M, Ansic D. Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. J. Econom. Psych. (1997) 18(6):605–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pryce AH. Timeshare industry structure and competitive analysis. Internat. J. Hospitality Management (2002) 21(3):267–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purohit D. Dual distribution channels: The competition between rental agencies and dealers. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):228–245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A, Lo AKC, Zwick R. Choice of prizes allocated by multiple lotteries with endogenously determined probabilities. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 87(1):180–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE. Repugnance as a constraint on markets. J. Econom. Perspectives (2007) 21(3):37–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE, Sönmez T, Ünver MU. Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(2):457–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE, Sönmez T, Ünver MU. Pairwise kidney exchange. J. Econom. Theory (2005) 125(2):151–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampson SE. Optimization of vacation timeshare scheduling. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(5):1079–1088LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan SM, Xie J. Advance pricing of services and other implications of separating purchase and consumption. J. Service Res. (2000) 2(3):227–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan SM, Xie J. Advance-selling as a competitive marketing tool. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2005) 22(3):351–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sönmez T, Ünver MU. Course bidding at business schools. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2010) 51(1):99–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava J, Chakravarti D, Rapoport A. Price and margin negotiations in marketing channels: An experimental study of sequential bargaining under one-sided uncertainty and opportunity cost of delay. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):163–184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y, Krishna A. Timeshare exchange mechanisms. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1223–1237LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J, Shugan SM. Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):219–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang W, Karaesmen IZ, Keskinocak P, Tayur S. Aircraft and crew scheduling for fractional ownership programs. Ann. Oper. Res. (2008) 159(1):415–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J. The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):315–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zwick R, Rapoport A. Tacit coordination in a decentralized market entry game with fixed capacity. Experiment. Econom. (2002) 5(3):253–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zwick R, Rapoport A, Lo AKC, Muthukrishnan AV. Consumer sequential search: Not enough or too much? Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):503–519LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.