Entrepreneurs Under Uncertainty: An Economic Experiment in China

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1670

References

  • Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rustström EE. Elicitation using multiple price list formats. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(4):365–366Google Scholar
  • Andersen S, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Ruström EE. Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica (2008) 76(3):583–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baruch Y. Response rate in academic studies—A comparative analysis. Human Relations (1999) 52(4):421–438Google Scholar
  • Begley TM. Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses. J. Bus. Venturing (1995) 10(3):249–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Begley TM, Boyd DP. A comparison of entrepreneurs and managers of small business firms. J. Management (1987) 13(1):99–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernardo A, Welch I. On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. Econom. Management Strategy (2001) 10(3):301–331CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F, Federgruen A. Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):18–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Binswanger HP. Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1980) 62(3):395–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borghans L, Heckman J, Golsteyn B, Meijers H. Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2009) 7(2–3):649–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockhaus RH. Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Acad. Management J. (1980) 23(3):509–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burmeister-Lamp K, Levesque M, Schade C. Are entrepreneurs influenced by risk attitude, regulatory focus or both? An experiment on entrepreneurs' time allocation. J. Bus. Venturing (2012) 27(4):456–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caird S. The enterprise tendency of occupational groups. Internat. Small Bus. J. (1991) 9(4):75–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caliendo M, Fossen F, Kritikos A. The impact of risk attitudes on entrepreneurial survival. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2010) 76(1):45–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Hogarth RM. The effects of financial incentives in economic experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):7–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):306–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Villeval MC. Cooperation and competition in intergenerational experiments in the field and the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(3):956–978CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman JS. Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cramer JS, Hartog J, Jonker N, van Praag M. Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship: An empirical test of a truism. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 48(1):29–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dehejia RH, Wahba S. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2002) 84(1):151–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djankov S, Qian Y, Roland G, Zhuravskaya E. Who are China's entrepreneurs? Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. (2006) 96(2):348–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Djankov S, Qian Y, Roland G, Zhuravskaya E. What makes a successful entrepreneur? Evidence from Brazil. (2007) . Working Paper 0104, Center for Economic and Financial Research, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  • Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2011) 9(3):522–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donkers B, Melenberg B, van Soest A. Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries: A large sample approach. J. Risk Uncertainty (2001) 22(2):165–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. (1961) 75(4):643–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elston JA, Harrison GW, Rutström EE. Experimental economics, entrepreneurs and the entry decision. (2006) . Working Paper 6, Economics Department, University of Central Florida, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  • Evans DS, Leighton LS. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(2):519–535Google Scholar
  • Fehr E, List J. The hidden costs and returns of incentives: Trust and trustworthiness among CEOs. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2004) 2(5):743–771CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Schmidt KM. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):817–868CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox CR, Tversky A. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(3):585–603CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaeser E, Laibson D, Scheinkman J, Soutter Ch. Measuring trust. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):811–846CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(3):1049–1074CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton B. Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. (2000) 108(3):604–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison GW, List J. Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature (2004) 42(4):1009–1055CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison GW, Lau MI, Rutstrom EE. Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment. Scandinavian J. Econom. (2007a) 109(2):341–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison GW, List J, Towe Ch. Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion. Econometrica (2007b) 75(2):433–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayward MLA, Shepherd DA, Griffin D. A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Sci. (2006) 52(2):160–172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holt ChA, Laury SK. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1644–1655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hull D, Bosley J, Udell G. Renewing the hunt for heffalump: Identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality characteristics. J. Small Bus. (1980) 18(1):11–18Google Scholar
  • IMDIMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005 (2005) (IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland) Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kihlstrom RE, Laffont JJ. A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(4):710–748Google Scholar
  • Kirzner I. Competition and Entrepreneurship (1973) (Chicago University Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Knight F. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (2006) (Dover Publications, Mineola, NY) Google Scholar
  • Koellinger Ph, Minniti M, Schade Ch. “I think I can”: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. J. Econom. Psych. (2007) 28(4):502–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koh HC. Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics: A study of Hong Kong MBA students. J. Managerial Psych. (1996) 11(3):12–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP. Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. (2004) 94(2):208–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD, List JA. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspect. (2007) 21(2):153–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindquist MJ, Sol J, Van Praag M. Why do entrepreneurial parents have entrepreneurial children? (2012) . IZA Discussion Paper 6740, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • List JA, Mason CF. Are CEOs expected utility maximizers? J. Econometrics (2011) 162(1):114–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1963) 28(1):55–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macko A, Tyszka T. Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Appl. Psych. (2009) 58(3):469–487CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall A. Principles of Economics (1920) 8th ed.(Macmillan & Co., London) Google Scholar
  • Moskowitz T, Vissing-Jorgensen A. The returns to entrepreneurial investment: A private equity premium puzzle? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):745–778CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nee V, Opper S. Political capital in a market economy. Soc. Forces (2010) 88(5):2105–2133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nee V, Opper S. Capitalism from Below: Markets and Institutional Change in China (2012) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pich MT, Loch ChH, de Meyer A. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1008–1023LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Putnam RD. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of the American Community (2001) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research (1966) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, East Norwalk, CT) Google Scholar
  • Sandri S, Schade Ch, Musshoff O, Odening M. Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertia in entrepreneurs' and non-entrepreneurs' disinvestment choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2010) 76(1):30–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarasvathy DK, Simon H, Lave L. Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1998) 33(2):207–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Say JB. A Treatise on Political Economy (1855) (Lippincott, Grambo & Co, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
  • Schere J. Tolerance of ambiguity as a discriminating variable between entrepreneurs and managers. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (1982) 42:404–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1947) 2nd ed.(Allen and Unwin, London) Google Scholar
  • Schumpeter JA. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1983) (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Shane SA. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual–Opportunity Nexus (2003) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith VL. Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(5):923–955Google Scholar
  • Stewart WH, Watson WE, Carland JC, Carland JW. A Proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and cooperate managers. J. Bus. Venturing (1999) 14(2):189–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uusitalo R. Homo entreprenaurus? Appl. Econom. (2001) 33(13):1631–1638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Praag M, Cramer JS. The roots of entrepreneurship and labour demand: Individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica (2001) 68(269):45–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Gaudecker HM, van Soest A, Wengström E. Heterogeneity in risky choice behavior in a broad population. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) 101(2):664–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1987) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wu B, Knott AM. Entrepreneurial risk and market entry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(9):1315–1330LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.