Invariant Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis

References

• Anderson TW, Darling DA (1952) Asymptotic theory of certain “goodness of fit” criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 23(2):193–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnes JW, Zinn CD, Eldred BS (1978) A methodology for obtaining the probability density function of the present worth of probabilistic cash flow profiles. IIE Trans. 10(3):226–236.Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Sarin RK (2007) Evaluating time streams of income: Discounting what? Theory Decision 63(2):95–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beccacece F, Gallo P, Peccati L (2001) Survival risk and project evaluation. Ruan D, Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, eds. Soft Computing for Risk Evaluation and Management (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany), 397–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bedford T (1998) Sensitivity indices for (tree)-dependent variables. Proc. Second Internat. Sympos. Sensitivity Anal. Model Output (Office for the Official Publications of the European Commission, Luxembourg, UK), 17–20.Google Scholar
• Benninga S (2008) Financial Modelling With Excel (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Berkowitz J (2001) Testing density forecasts, with applications to risk management. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 19(4):465–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley R, Li Calzi M (2000) Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions Econom. Finance 23(1):53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgonovo E (2007) A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 92(6):771–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgonovo E, Castaings W, Tarantola S (2011) Moment independent uncertainty importance: New results and analytical test cases. Risk Anal. 31(3):404–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campolongo F, Saltelli A (1997) Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: An application of different analysis methods. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 57(1):49–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castaings W, Borgonovo E, Tarantola S (2010) Sampling plans for the estimation of moment-independent importance measures. SAMO 2010: Proc. Sixth Internat. Conf. Sensitivity Anal. Model Output (Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, Milan, Italy), 7629–7630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chun M-H, Han S-J, Tak N-I (2000) An uncertainty importance measure using a distance metric for the change in a cumulative distribution function. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 70(3):313–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen RT (1997) Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Cox LA (2008) Why risk is not variance: An expository note. Risk Anal. 28(4):925–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crnkovic C, Drachman J (1996) Quality control. RISK 9(9):139–143.Google Scholar
• Deza MM, Deza E (2009) Encyclopedia of Distances (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B, Gong G (1983) A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Amer. Statistician 37(1):36–48.Google Scholar
• Esipenko VI, Shchuko OB (1995) Probability density of the sum of random variables with random coefficients. Radiophysics Quantum Electronics 38(6):390–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felli JC, Hazen GB (1998) Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information. Medical Decision Making 18(1):95–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felli JC, Hazen GB (2004) Javelin diagrams: A graphical tool for probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Decision Anal. 1(2):93–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Grubbström RW (1967) On the application of the Laplace transform to certain economic problems. Management Sci. 13(7):558–567.Link, Google Scholar
• Hazen G (2009) An extension of the internal rate of return to stochastic cash flows. Management Sci. 55(6):1030–1034.Link, Google Scholar
• Hazen GB, Huang M (2006) Parametric sensitivity analysis using large-sample approximate Bayesian posterior distributions. Decision Anal. 3(4):208–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Hertz DB (1964) Risk analysis in capital investment. Harvard Bus. Rev. 42(1):95–106.Google Scholar
• Hillier FS (1963) The derivation of probabilistic information for the evaluation of risky investments. Management Sci. 9(3):443–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Howard RA (1966) Information value theory. IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics 2(1):22–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard RA (1983) The evolution of decision analysis. Howard RA, Matheson JE, eds. The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis (Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA), 5–16.Google Scholar
• Howard RA (1988) Decision analysis: Practice and promise. Management Sci. 34(6):679–695.Link, Google Scholar
• Iman RL, Hora SC (1990) A robust measure of uncertainty importance for use in fault tree system analysis. Risk Anal. 10(3):401–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacquet P, Bruner R, Bodily SE (1999) Genzyme/GelTex Pharmaceuticals joint venture. Case UVA-F-1254, Darden School of Business, University of Viriginia, Charlottesville. Google Scholar
• Jose VRR, Nau RF, Winkler RL (2008) Scoring rules, generalized entropy, and utility maximization. Oper. Res. 56(5):1146–1157.Link, Google Scholar
• Jose VRR, Nau RF, Winkler RL (2009) Sensitivity to distance and baseline distributions in forecast evaluation. Management Sci. 55(4):582–590.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM (1988) Notes on the Theory of Choice, Underground Classics in Economics (WestView Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Kuiper NH (1960) Tests concerning random points on a circle. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. A 63:38–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez JA, Saidenberg MR (2000) Evaluating credit risk models. J. Banking Finance 24(1–2):151–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason DM, Schuenemeyer JH (1983) A modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test sensitive to tail alternatives. Ann. Statist. 11(3):933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oakley JE, O'Hagan A (2004) Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: A Bayesian approach. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66(3):751–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oakley JE (2009) Decision-theoretic sensitivity analysis for complex computer models. Technometrics 51(2):121–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen AB (2003) The dimension distribution and quadrature test functions. Statistica Sinica 13(1):1–17.Google Scholar
• Park CK, Ahn KI (1994) A new approach for measuring uncertainty importance and distributional sensitivity in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 46(3):253–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearson K (1905) On the General Theory of Skew Correlation and Non-Linear Regression: Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution—XIV, Drapers' Company Research Memoirs, Biometric Series II (Dulau & Co., London).Google Scholar
• Plischke E (2010) An effective algorithm for computing global sensitivity indices (EASI). Reliability Engrg. System Safety 95(4):354–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plischke E, Borgonovo E, Smith CL (2013) Global sensitivity measures from given data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226(3):536–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt JW, Raiffa H, Schlaifer R (1995) Statistical Decision Theory, 3rd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ramsay CM (2008) The distribution of sums of i.i.d. Pareto random variables with arbitrary shape parameter. Comm. Statist., Theory Methods 37(14):2177–2184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saltelli A, Marivoet J (1990) Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selected techniques. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 28(2):229–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage LJ (1954) Foundations of Statistics, 2nd ed. (Dover Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Smith JE (1998) Evaluating income streams: A decision analysis approach. Management Sci. 44(12, Part 1):1690–1708.Link, Google Scholar
• Wagner HM (1995) Global sensitivity analysis. Oper. Res. 43(6):948–969.Link, Google Scholar
• Watson GS (1961) Goodness of fit test on a circle. Biometrika 48(1–2):109–114.Crossref, Google Scholar