Learning from My Success and from Others' Failure: Evidence from Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1720

References

  • AHA (2008) American Hospital Association Annual Survey of Hospitals (American Hospital Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational Learning (Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Audia PG, Brion S (2007) Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(2):255–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2):191–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads' patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blume A, Franco AM (2007) Decentralized learning from failure. J. Econom. Theory 133(1):504–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohn RE (2005) From art to science in manufacturing: The evolution of technological knowledge. Foundations and Trends in Tech., Inform. Oper. Management 1(2):129–212.Google Scholar
  • Bresman H (2010) External learning activities and team performance: A multimethod field study. Organ. Sci. 21(1):81–96.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell W, Sedikides C (1999) Self-threat magnifies the selfserving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Rev. General Psych. 3:23–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chuang Y-T, Baum JAC (2003) It's all in the name: Failure-induced learning by multiunit chains. Admin. Sci. Q. 48(1):33–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Daft RL, Weick KE (1984) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):284–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J (2003) Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. 14(3):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dillon RL, Tinsley CH (2008) How near-misses influence decision making under risk: A missed opportunity for learning. Management Sci. 54(8):1425–1440.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Q. 44(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organ. Sci. 13(2):128–146.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC (2011) Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):48–55.Google Scholar
  • Gardner D (2001) CardioThoracic systems. HBS Case 9-899-281, Harvard Business School, Boston. Google Scholar
  • Gilbert DT, Malone PS (1995) The correspondence bias. Psych. Bull. 117(1):21–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Pisano GP (2011) Why leaders don't learn from success. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):68–74.Google Scholar
  • Gino F, Argote L, Miron-Spektor E, Todorova G (2010) First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):102–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Admin. Sci. Q. 43(1):58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines' learning. Admin. Sci. Q. 47(4):609–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heider F (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L (1992) Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 267(17):2344–2348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Baum JAC (1997) Opportunity and constraint: Organizations' learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):75–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones EE, Davis KE (1965) From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (Academic Press, San Diego), 219–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan AH, Audia PG (2012) Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):211–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judson RA, Owen AL (1999) Estimating dynamic panel data models: A guide for macroeconomists. Econom. Lett. 65(1):9–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS, Staats BR (2012) Accumulating a portfolio of experience: The effect of focal and related experience on surgeon performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(4):618–633.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • KC DS, Terwiesch C (2009) Impact of workload on service time and patient safety: An econometric analysis of hospital operations. Management Sci. 55(9):1486–1498.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J-YJ, Miner AS (2007) Vicarious learning from the failures and near-failures of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 50(3):687–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J-Y, Kim J-YJ, Miner AS (2009) Organizational learning from extreme performance experience: The impact of success and recovery experience. Organ. Sci. 20(6):958–978.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB, Hackbarth AD, Goldmann DA, Sharek PJ (2010) Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. New England J. Medicine 363(22):2124–2134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration. Management Sci. 38(5):623–644.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré MA, Nembhard IM (2010) Inside the organizational learning curve: Understanding the organizational learning process. Foundations and Trends in Tech., Inform. Oper. Management 4(1):1–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré MA, Tsikriktsis N (2006) Organizational learning curves for customer dissatisfaction: Heterogeneity across airlines. Management Sci. 52(3):352–366.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré MA, Mukherjee AS, Wassenhove LNV (2000) Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. 46(5):597–611.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li G, Rajagopalan S (1997) The impact of quality on learning. J. Oper. Management 15(3):181–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Bryan JF (1967) Performance goals as determinants of level of performance and boredom. J. Appl. Psych. 51(2):120–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Shaw KN, Saari LM, Latham GP (1981) Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psych. Bull. 90(1):125–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Manage. J. 53(3):451–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1993) Organizations (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Moore DA, Swift SA, Sharek Z, Gino F (2010) Correspondence bias in performance evaluation: Why grade inflation works. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 36(6):843–852.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris MW, Moore PC (2000) The lessons we (don't) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Admin. Sci. Q. 45(4):737–765.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nashef SA, Roques F, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, Michel P, Grover FL, Wyse RK, Ferguson TB (2002) Validation of European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothoracic Surgery 22:101–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD (1989) A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 79(6, part 2):I3–I12.Google Scholar
  • Piaget J (1963) The Psychology of Intelligence (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, Newman M, Nussmeier N, Wolman R, Aggarwal Aet al.. (1996) Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. New England J. Medicine 335(25):1857–1864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 (Academic Press, San Diego), 173–220.Google Scholar
  • Ross L, Nisbett E (1991) The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ross L, Amabile TM, Steinmetz JL (1977) Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(7):485–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sedikides C (1993) Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(2):317–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 14 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 231–266.Google Scholar
  • Staats BR (2012) Unpacking team familiarity: The effect of geographic location and hierarchical role. Production Oper. Management 21(3):619–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staats BR, Gino F (2012) Specialization and variety in repetitive tasks: Evidence from a Japanese bank. Management Sci. 58(6):1141–1159.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM (1981) The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Management Rev. 6(4):577–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sternberg RJ (2003) Cognitive Psychology (Thomson/Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Taylor SE, Brown JD (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psych. Bull. 103:193–210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1978) Salience, attention and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11 (Academic Press, New York), 249–288.Google Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner B (1974) Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Weiner B (1979) A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. J. Educational Psych. 72(1):676–681.Google Scholar
  • Weiner B (1995) Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct (Guildford Publications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Weiner B (2001) Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attribution perspective. Salili F, Chiu C, Hong Y, eds. Student Motivation: The Culture and Context of Learning, The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality (Springer, New York), 17–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong PTP, Weiner B (1981) When people ask “Why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 40(4):650–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R, Bandura A (1989) Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. 14(3):361–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.