The Dark Side of Competition for Status

References

• Abbink K, Hermann B (2011) The moral costs of nastiness. Econom. Inquiry 49(2):631–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbink K, Sadrieh A (2009) The pleasure of being nasty. Econom. Lett. 105(3):306–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbink K, Masclet D, van Veelen M (2009) Reference point effects in antisocial preferences. Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G, Kranton R (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson D, Crowell C, Sponsel S, Clarke M, Brence J (1982) Behavior management in the public accommodations industry: A three-project demonstration. J. Organ. Behav. Management 4(1–2):33–66.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010a) The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high-school students. J. Public Econom. 94(7–8):435–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010b) The provision of relative performance feedback information: An experimental analysis of performance and happiness. Mimeo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Lindner F, Sutter M (2012) Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a natural experiment. IZA Discussion Paper 6316, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Ball S, Eckel C (1996) Buying status: Experimental evidence on status in negotiation. Psych. Marketing 13(4):381–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball S, Eckel C (1998) The economic value of status. J. Socio-Econom. 24(4):495–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball S, Eckel C, Grossman P, Zame W (2001) Status in markets. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):161–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives. Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Baron J (1988) The employment relation as a social relation. J. Japanese Internat. Econom. 2(4):492–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, von Siemens FA (2010) The intensity of incentives in firms and markets: Moral hazard with envious agents. Labour Econom. 17(3):598–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou RJM, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Nossol M (2011) Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management Sci. 57(10):1721–1736.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolle F, Tan J, Zizzo D (2010) Vendettas. CeDEx Discussion Paper 2010-02, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
• Brewer M (1999) The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? J. Soc. Issues 55(3):429–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bué J, Sandret N (2008) Un salarié sur six estime être l'object de comportements hostiles dans le cadre de son travail. Premières synthèses, DARES, mai (22.2).Google Scholar
• Bull C, Schotter A, Weigelt K (1987) Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. 95(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron J, Banko K, Pierce D (2001) Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. Behav. Analyst 24(1):1–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter J, Matthews P, Schirm J (2010) Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):504–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Grosskopf B (2001) Relative payoffs and happiness. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 45(3):301–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Levine DI (2010) When is employee retaliation acceptable at work? Evidence from quasi-experiments. Indust. Relations 49(4):499–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A (2007) Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1340–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen K (2003) Sabotage in promotion tournaments. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 19(1):119–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li X (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SM, Sheremeta RM (2012) Strategically equivalent contests. Working Paper 10-06, Economic Science Institute, Chapman University, Orange, CA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark A, Masclet D, Villeval M-C (2010) Effort and comparison income. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 63(3):407–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L (2009) Fair wages and effort—Evidence from a field experiment. Working paper, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Deci E (1975) Intrinsic Motivation (Plenum Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2009) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. IZA Discussion Paper 4395, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Ding DZ, Ge L, Warner M (2001) A new form of Chinese human resource management? Personnel and labour-management relations in Chinese township and village enterprises: A case-study approach. Indust. Relations J. 32(4):327–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2010) Performance pay and multi-dimensional sorting productivity, preferences and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Fliessbach K, Sunde U, Weber B (2011) Relative versus absolute income, joy of winning, and gender: Brain imaging evidence. J. Public Econom. 95(3/4):279–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duesenberry J (1949) Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Wilson R (2007) Social learning in coordination games: Does status matter? Experiment. Econom. 10(3):317–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Fatas E, Wilson R (2010) Cooperation and status in organizations J. Public Econom. Theory 12(4):737–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2007) Paying respect. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(4):135–150.Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):990–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enders W, Hoover GA (2004) Whose line is it? Plagiarism in economics. J. Econom. Literature 42(2):487–493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2009) Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence. Labour Econom. 16(6):679–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer pressure. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fehr E, Huffman D (2008) The power and limits of tournament incentives. Discussion paper, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Fanelli D (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4(5):e5738:1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart. J. Econom. 108:437–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franceschelli I, Galiani S, Gulmez E (2010) Performance pay and productivity of low- and high-ability workers. Labour Econom. 17(2):317–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank R (1985) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(1):101–116.Google Scholar
• Frey B, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Thöni S (2010) Social comparison and performance: Experimental evidence on the fair-wage effort hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(3):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Palacios-Huerta I (2006) Sabotage in tournaments: Making the beautiful game a little less beautiful. Mimeo, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Georgellis Y, Iossa E, Tabvuma V (2011) Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. J. Public Administration Res. Theory 21(3):473–493.Google Scholar
• Gino F, Staats B (2011) Driven by social comparisons: How feedback about coworkers' effort influences individual productivity. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grasmick H, Kobayashi E (2002) Workplace deviance in Japan: Applying an extended model of deterrence. Deviant Behav. 23(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Kremer K, Macho V, eds. Forschung und Wissenschaftliches Rechnen GWDG Bericht 63 (Gesellschaft fur Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany).Google Scholar
• Halevy N, Bornstein G, Sagiv L (2008) “Ingroup love” and “Outgroup hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflicts: A new game paradigm. Psych. Sci. 19(4):405–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan RL, Krishnan R, Newman D (2008) The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans. Accounting Rev. 83(4):893–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz J (1979) The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 37(8):1352–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2008) How many winners are good to have? On tournaments with sabotage. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 65(3–4):682–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B, Kräckel M, Selten R (2007) Sabotage in asymmetric contests—An experimental analysis. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 14(3):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal–agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and incentives. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 7:24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman B, Loch C, Önçüler A (2004) Status as a valued resource. Soc. Psych. Quart. 67(1):103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James H (2005) Why did you do that? An economic examination of the effect of extrinsic compensation on intrinsic motivation and performance. J. Econom. Psych. 26(4):549–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konrad K (2000) Sabotage in rent-seeking contests. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 16(1):155–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Köszegi B (2006) Ego utility, overconfidence, and task choice. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 4(4):673–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D (1997) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(2):359–364.Google Scholar
• Kube S, Marechal A, Puppe C (2013) Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen C, Tymula A (2012) Feedback, self-esteem, and performance in organizations. Management Sci. 58(1):94–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Kura KM, Shamsudin FM, Chauhan A (2013) Moderating effect of self-regulatory efficacy on the relationship between organizational formal controls and workplace deviance: A proposed framework. Internat. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 3(1):15–26.Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1989) Pay equality and industrial politics. J. Political Econom. 97(3):561–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspect. 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA, Bailey CD, Euzent PJ, Martin TL (2001) Academic economists behaving badly? A survey on three areas of unethical behavior. Econom. Inquiry 39(1):162–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madsen K (1994) Whole blood serotonin and leadership. Masters RD, McGuire MT, eds. The Neurotransmitter Revolution: Serotonin, Social Behavior, and the Law (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL).Google Scholar
• Maher B (2010) Research integrity: Sabotage! Nature 467:516–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masclet D, Villeval MC (2008) Punishment, inequality, and welfare: A public good experiment. Soc. Choice and Welfare 31(3):475–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A, Shi X (2007) Contests for status. J. Political Econom. 115(2):338–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nguyen Q, Leung P (2009) Choice of remuneration regime in fisheries: The case of Hawaii's longline fisheries. J. Agricultural Res. Econom. 34(3):498–517.Google Scholar
• Nikiforakis N (2008) Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? J. Public Econom. 92(1–2):91–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikiforakis N, Normann H-T (2008) A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public goods experiments. Experiment. Econom. 11(4):358–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nordstrom R, Lorenzi P, Hall R (1990) A review of public posting of performance feedback. J. Organ. Behav. Management 11(2):101–123.Google Scholar
• Pan X, Houser D (2011) Competition for trophies triggers male generosity. PLoS ONE 6(4):e18050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice G, Burgess S, Propper C (2007) Performance pay in the public sector: A review of the issues and evidence. Report, Office of Manpower Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Preston I, Szymanski S (2003) Cheating in contests. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 19(4):612–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rustichini A (2008) Dominance and competition. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(2–3):647–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rustichini A, Vostroknutov A (2008) Competition with skill and luck. Mimeo, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Schwieren C, Weichselbaumer D (2010) Does competition enhance performance or cheating? A laboratory experiment. J. Econom. Psych. 31(3):241–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley C, Zhou J, Oldham G (2004) Effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Shleifer A (2004) Does competition destroy ethical behavior? Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 94(2):414–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafkov ID (2013) Private and public relative performance information under different compensation contracts. Accounting Rev. 88(1):327–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tran A, Zeckhauser R (2012) Rank as an incentive: Evidence from a field experiment. Mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Van Erp J (2008) Reputational sanctions in private and public regulation. Erasmus Law Rev. 1(5):145–162.Google Scholar
• Veblen T (1949) The Theory of the Leisure Class (George Allen and Unwin, London).Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ (2003) Money burning and rank egalitarianism with random dictators. Econom. Lett. 81(2):263–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(1):75–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zizzo DJ, Oswald AJ (2001) Are people willing to pay to reduce others' incomes? Annales d'Economie et de Statistique (63–64):39–65.Crossref, Google Scholar