Matthew: Effect or Fable?

References

• Allison PD, Long JS, Krauze TK (1982) Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 47(5):615–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Manso G, Zivin JG (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bales RF, Strodtbeck FL, Mills TM, Roseborough ME (1951) Channels of communication in small groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 16(4):461–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1955) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Godart F, Lee W (2009) What is social status? Comparisons and contrasts with cognate concepts. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Podolny JM, Smith N (2011) Organizing contests for status: The Matthew effect vs. the Mark effect. Management Sci. 57(3):439–457.Link, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Smith N, White H (2010) A model of robust positions in social networks. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(3):943–992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cole S, Cole JR (1968) Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 33(3):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Gould RV (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Stuart TE (1995) A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(5):1224–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan MT (1996) Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(3):659–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Sterling AD (2012) Network progeny? Prefounding social ties and the success of new entrants. Management Sci. 58(7):1292–1304.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts PW, Khaire M, Rider C (2011) Isolating the symbolic effect of employee mobility: Price increases after hiring winemakers from prominent wineries. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. 101(3):147–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack D (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What's in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–590.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waguespack D, Sorenson O (2011) The ratings game: Asymmetry in classification. Organ. Sci. 22(3):541–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar