Governance and CEO Turnover: Do Something or Do the Right Thing?
Published Online:3 Sep 2013https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1759
References
- (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Innovation and institutional ownership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):277–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Entrenchment and severance pay in optimal governance structures. J. Finance 58(2):519–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2005) The costs of entrenched boards. J. Financial Econom. 78(2):409–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (MacMillan, New York).Google Scholar
- (2001) Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):901–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Bus. Lawyer 54(2):921–963.Google Scholar
- (1996) When managers cover their posteriors: Making the decisions the market wants to see. RAND J. Econom. 27(3):523–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? J. Corporate Finance 12(3):403–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Empirical research on CEO turnover and firm performance: A discussion. J. Accounting Econom. 36(1–3):227–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. J. Finance 61(2):655–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Executive compensation, managerial turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. J. Accounting Econom. 7(1–3):43–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Governance mechanisms and equity prices. J. Finance 60(6):2859–2894.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. J. Finance 67(5):1943–1977.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Managerial Decision Econom. 28(4–5):307–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Performance changes following top management dismissals. J. Finance 50(4):1029–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. 88(2):134–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1975) Hindsight/foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgement under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 1(3):288–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Tradeoffs in corporate governance: Evidence from board structures and charter provisions. Quart. J. Finance 1(4):667–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):96–118.Google Scholar
- (2003) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank New York, Econom. Policy Rev. 9(1):7–26.Google Scholar
- (1999) Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(1):169–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Postbankruptcy performance and management turnover. J. Finance 50(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Managerial succession and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 74(2):237–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. J. Finance 56(6):2265–2297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) CEO turnover and relative performance evaluation. J. Finance. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- (2011) Concentrating on governance. J. Finance 66(5):1649–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) CEO succession 2003: The perils of “good” governance. Strategy + Business 35(Summer), http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/sb35_04208.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2012) Information projection: Model and applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(3):961–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) CEO turnover and outside succession: A cross-sectional analysis. J. Financial Econom. 46(2):165–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1977) The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 (Academic, New York), 173–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) The Person and the Situation (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2004) Google prospectus, amendment 9 to form S-1 registration statement, letter from the founders. Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (1776) An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Stock prices, event prediction and event studies: An examination of top management changes. J. Financial Econom. 20(1):461–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Outside directors and CEO succession. J. Financial Econom. 20:431–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) CEO turnover and the firm's investment decisions. J. Financial Econom. 37(2):159–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Are voters rational? Evidence from gubernatorial elections. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

