Optimal Design of Social Comparison Effects: Setting Reference Groups and Reference Points

References

• Aflaki S, Popescu I (2014) Managing retention in service relationships. Management Sci. 60(2):415–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avcı B, Loutfi Z, Mihm J, Belavina E, Keck S (2012) Comparison as incentive: Newsvendor decisions in a social context. Prod. Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print May 1, doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01354.x.Google Scholar
• Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A (2012) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J. Law, Econom., Organ., ePub ahead of print August 20, doi: 10.1093/jleo/ews020.Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010) The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J. Public Econom. 94(7–8):435–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2014) Team incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Sarin RK (2012) Engineering Happiness (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Nossol M (2011) Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management Sci. 57(10):1721–1736.Link, Google Scholar
• Blanton H, Buunk BP, Gibbons FX, Kuyper H (1999) When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(3):420–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond R (2005) Group size and conformity. Group Process Interg. 8(4):331–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer MB, Weber JG (1994) Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(2):268–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buunk BP, Collins RL, Taylor SE, VanYperen NW, Dakof GA (1990) The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(6): 1238–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caro F, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2012) Product and price competition with satiation effects. Management Sci. 58(7):1357–1373.Link, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Sacerdote BI, West JE (2013) From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica 81(3):855–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econom. 117(3):817–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins RL (1996) For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psych. Bull. 119(1):51–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur J, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Malmendier U (2006) Paying not to go to the gym. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):694–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delmas M, Lessem N (2012) Saving power to conserve your reputation? Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Dupas P, Kremer M (2011) Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Game Theory, 7th printing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gale D, Nikaidô H (1965) The Jacobian matrix and global univalence of mappings. Mathematische Annalen 159(2):81–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy G, Littlewood JE, Pólya G (1952) Inequalities, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hossain T, List JA (2012) The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple manipulations. Management Sci. 58(12):2151–2167.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kajii A, Morris S (1997) The robustness of equilibria to incomplete information. Econometrica 65(6):1283–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kojima F (2006) Risk-dominance and perfect foresight dynamics in n-player games. J. Econom. Theory 128(1):255–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen CM, Tymula A (2012) Feedback, self-esteem, and performance in organizations. Management Sci. 58(1):94–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Kukushkin NS (2004) A fixed point theorem for decreasing mappings. Econom. Lett. 46(1):23–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine DK (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 1(3):593–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis MA, Neighbors C (2008) Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: A review of the research on personalized normative feedback. J. Amer. College Health 54(4):213–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Wu Y (2008) Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Sci. 54(11):1835–1849.Link, Google Scholar
• Lockwood P, Jordan CH, Kunda Z (2002) Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(4):854–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCardle KF, Rajaram K, Tang CS (2009) A decision analysis tool for evaluating fundraising tiers. Decision Anal. 6(1):4–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Nasiry J, Popescu I (2011) Dynamic pricing with loss-averse consumers and peak-end anchoring. Oper. Res. 59(6):1361–1368.Link, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Tang CS (2009) Operations Management Models with Consumer-Driven Demand, Springer International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Yakubovich V (2012) The Darwinian workplace. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(5):1–4.Google Scholar
• Popescu I, Wu Y (2007) Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Oper. Res. 55(3):413–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1986) Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):701–715.Google Scholar
• Schultz PW (1998) Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 21(1):25–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen ZJ, Su X (2007) Customer behavior modeling in revenue management and auctions: A review and new research opportunities. Prod. Oper. Management 16(6):713–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth A (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Stevenson HW, Lee SY, Chen C, Stigler JW, Hsu CC, Kitamura S, Hatano G (1990) Context of achievements: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese students. Monographs Soc. Res. Child Development 55(1–2):1–119.Google Scholar
• Suls J, Wheeler L (2000) Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research, The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tereyagoglu N, Veeraraghavan S (2012) Selling to conspicuous consumers: Pricing, production and sourcing decisions. Management Sci. 58(12):2168–2189.Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(S1):S164–S187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge, Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Veeraraghavan S, Debo L (2011) Herding in queues with waiting costs: Rationality and regret. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):329–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Vives X (1999) Oligopoly Pricing: Old Ideas and New Tools (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wills TA (1981) Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psych. Bull. 90(2):245–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood JV (1989) Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psych. Bull. 106(2):231–248.Crossref, Google Scholar