How Do Industry Peers Respond to Control Threats?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1773

References

  • Almeida H, Campello M, Weisbach MS (2004) The cash flow sensitivity of cash. J. Finance 59:1777–1804.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bates TW, Becher DA, Lemmon ML (2008) Board classification and managerial entrenchment: Evidence from the market for corporate control. J. Financial Econom. 87:656–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:783–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger PG, Ofek E, Yermack DL (1997) Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. J. Finance 52:1411–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billet MT, Xue H (2007) The takeover deterrent effect of open market share repurchases. J. Finance 62:1827–1850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Core JE, Guay WR, Rusticus TO (2006) Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors' expectations. J. Finance 61:655–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L, Stulz RM (2006) Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. J. Financial Econom. 81:227–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denis DJ, Denis DK (1993) Managerial discretion, organizational structure, and corporate performance: A study of leveraged recapitalizations. J. Accounting Econom. 16:209–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Denis DJ, Serrano JM (1996) Active investors and management turnover following unsuccessful control contests. J. Financial Econom. 40:239–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dittmar AK (2000) Why do firms repurchase stock? J. Bus. 73:331–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dittmar AK, Dittmar RF (2008) The timing of financing decisions: An examination of the correlation in financing waves. J. Financial Econom. 90:59–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dlugosz J, Fahlenbrach R, Gompers P, Metrick A (2006) Large blocks of stock: Prevalence, size, and measurement. J. Corporate Finance 12:594–618.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dong M, Hirshleifer D, Richardson S, Teoh SH (2006) Does investor misevaluation drive the takeover market. J. Finance 61:725–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckbo BE (1983) Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. 11:241–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckbo BE (1985) Mergers and the market power doctrine: Evidence from capital markets. J. Bus. 47:1005–1029.Google Scholar
  • Edmans A, Goldstein I, Jiang W (2012) The real effects of financial markets: The impact of prices on takeovers. J. Finance 67:933–971.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fazzari SM, Hubbard RG, Petersen BC (1988) Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 19:141–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fee CE, Thomas S (2004) Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: Evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. J. Financial Econom. 74:423–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fos V (2013) The disciplinary effects of proxy contests. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Ishii JL, Metrick A (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118:107–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Ishii JL, Metrick A (2010) Extreme governance: An analysis of dual-class firms in the United States. Rev. Financial Stud. 23:1051–1088.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1982) Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. McCall J, ed. The Economics of Information and Uncertainty (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 107–140.Google Scholar
  • Grullon G, Michaely R (2004) The information content of share repurchase programs. J. Finance 59:651–680.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guenther DA, Rosman AJ (1994) Difference between Compustat and CRSP SIC Codes and related effects on research. J. Accounting Econom. 18:115–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harford J (2005) What drives merger waves? J. Financial Econom. 77:529–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Healy PM, Palepu KG, Ruback RS (1992) Does corporate performance improve after mergers? J. Financial Econom. 31:135–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendershott RJ (1996) Which takeover targets overinvest? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 31:563–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Kaplan SN (2001) Corporate governance and merger activity in the United States: Making sense of the 1980s and 1990s J. Econom. Perspect. 15:121–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hovakimian A, Opler T, Titman S (2001) The debt-equity choice. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 36:1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76:323–329.Google Scholar
  • Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48:831–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahle KM, Walkling RA (1996) The impact of industry classifications on financial research. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 31:309–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan SN (1989) The effects of management buyouts on operating performance and value. J. Financial Econom. 24:217–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambrecht BM, Myers SC (2007) A theory of takeovers and disinvestment. J. Finance 62:809–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehn K, Poulsen A (1989) Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. J. Finance 44:771–787.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loderer C, Waelchli U (2010) Firm age and performance. Working paper, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin KJ, McConnell JJ (1991) Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover. J. Finance 46:671–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell ML, Mulherin JH (1996) The impact of industry shocks on takeover and restructuring activity. J. Financial Econom. 41:193–229.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988) Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. Auerbach AJ, ed. Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences (National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago), 101–136.Google Scholar
  • Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1989) Alternative mechanisms for corporate control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79:842–852.Google Scholar
  • Morellec E (2004) Can managerial discretion explain observed leverage ratios? Rev. Financial Stud. 17:257–294.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Opler T, Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, Williamson R (1999) The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. J. Financial Econom. 52:3–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhodes-Kropf M, Robinson DT, Viswanathan S (2005) Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence. J. Financial Econom. 77:561–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson S (2006) Over-investment of free cash flow. Rev. Accounting Stud. 11:159–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Safieddine A, Titman S (1999) Leverage and corporate performance: Evidence from unsuccessful takeovers. J. Finance 54:547–580.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwert GW (2000) Hostility in takeovers: In the eyes of the beholder? J. Finance 55:2599–2640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Servaes H (1994) Do takeover targets overinvest? Rev. Financial Stud. 7:253–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shahrur H (2005) Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers. J. Financial Econom. 76:61–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988) Value maximization and the acquisition process. J. Econom. Perspect. 2:7–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song MH, Walkling RA (2000) Abnormal returns to rivals of acquisition targets: A test of the “acquisition probability hypothesis.” J. Financial Econom. 55:143–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stillman R (1983) Examining antitrust policy towards horizontal mergers. J. Financial Econom. 11:225–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stulz R (1990) Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. J. Financial Econom. 26:3–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Titman S, Wessels R (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice. J. Finance 43:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zwiebel J (1996) Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86:1197–1215.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.