The Effect of Giving It All Up on Valuation: A New Look at the Endowment Effect

References

• Barkan R, Busemeyer JR (2003) Modeling dynamic inconsistency with a changing reference point. J. Behavioral Decision Making 16:235–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single response sequential method. Behavioral Sci. 9:226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burson K, Faro D, Rottenstreich Y (2012) Multiple-unit holdings yield attenuated endowment effects. Management Sci. 59:545–555.Link, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (2000) Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. Kahneman D, Tversky A, eds. Choices, Values, and Frames (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 288–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmon Z, Ariely D (2000) Focusing on the foregone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. J. Consumer Res. 27:360–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmon Z, Wertenbroch K, Zeelenberg M (2003) Option attachment: When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. J. Consumer Res. 30:15–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman GB (1998) Similarity and reluctance to trade. J. Behavioral Decision Making 11:47–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Ert E, Yechiam Y (2008) Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the role of experience in repeated decisions. J. Behavioral Decision Making 21:575–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ert E, Erev I (2008) The rejection of attractive gambles, loss aversion, and the lemon avoidance heuristic. J. Econom. Psych. 29:715–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harinck F, van Dijk E, van Beest I, Mersmann P (2007) When gains loom larger than losses: Reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money. Psych. Sci. 18:1099–1105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 28:79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horowitz JK, McConnell KE, Quiggin J (1999) A test of competing explanations of compensation demanded. Econom. Inquiry 37:637–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Haubl G, Keinan A (2007) Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition 33:461–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98:1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut T, Kogut E (2011) Possession attachment: Individual differences in the endowment effect. J. Behavioral Decision Making 24:377–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Small DA, Loewenstein G (2004) Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psych. Sci. 15:337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2003) Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? Quart. J. Econom. 118:41–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• List JA (2004) Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace. Econometrica 72:615–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellers B, Schwartz A, Ritov I (1999) Emotion-based choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 128:332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellers BA, Ritov I (2010) How beliefs influence the relative magnitude of pleasure and pain. J. Behavioral Decision Making 23:369–382.Google Scholar
• Mellers BA, Schwartz A, Ho K, Ritov I (1997) Emotional reactions to outcomes of risky options. Psych. Sci. 8:423–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moran S, Ritov I (2007) Experience in integrative negotiations: What needs to be learned? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43:77–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morewedge CK, Shu LL, Gilbert DT, Wilson TD (2009) Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45:947–951.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2005a) How do intentions affect loss aversion? J. Marketing Res. 42:139–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2005b) The boundaries of loss aversion. J. Marketing Res. 42:119–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paolacci G, Burson KA, Rick SI (2011) The Intermediate alternative effect: Considering a small tradeoff increases subsequent willingness to make large tradeoffs. J. Consumer Psych. 21:384–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters E, Slovic P, Gregory R (2003) The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity. J. Behavioral Decision Making 16:309–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope D, Simonsohn U (2011) Round numbers as goals: Evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab. Psych. Sci. 22:71–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritov I, Moran S (2008) Missed opportunity for creating value in negotiations: Reluctance to making integrative gambit offers. J. Behav. Decision Making 21:337–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenboim M, Shavit T, Cohen C (2013) Do bidders require a monetary premium for cognitive effort in an auction? J. Socio-Econom. 42:99–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalvi S, Moran S, Ritov I (2010) Overcoming initial anchors: The effect of negotiators' dispositional control beliefs. Negotiation and Conflict Management Res. 3:232–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz MA, Loewenstein G (1998) The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. J. Consumer Res. 25:276–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1980) Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1:39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 107:1039–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dijk E, van Knippenberg D (1998) Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion, and the comparability of consumer goods. J. Econom. Psych. 19:485–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weaver R, Frederick S (2012) A reference price theory of the endowment effect. J. Marketing Res. 49:696–707.Crossref, Google Scholar