Dynamics of Consumer Adoption of Financial Innovation: The Case of ATM Cards

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1792

References

  • Ackerberg D, Gowrisankaran G (2006) Quantifying equilibrium network externalities in the ACH banking industry. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):738–761.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams AS, Thieben KA (1991) Automatic teller machines and the older population. Appl. Ergonomics 22(2):85–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2010) Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. J. Econometrics 156(1):38–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvarez F, Lippi F (2009) Financial innovation and the transactions demand for cash. Econometrica 77(2):363–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arcidiacono P, Miller RA (2013) Identifying dynamic discrete choice models off short panels. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • Attanasio OR, Guiso L, Jappelli T (2002) The demand for money, financial innovation, and the welfare cost of inflation: An analysis with household data. J. Political Econom. 110(2):317–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bauer K, Hein SE (2006) The effect of heterogeneous risk on the early adoption of Internet banking technologies. J. Banking Finance 30(6):1713–1725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumol WJ (1952) The transactions demand for cash: An inventory-theoretic approach. Quart. J. Econom. 66:545–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borzekowski R, Elizabeth KK, Shaista A (2008) Consumers' use of debit cards: Patterns, preferences, and price response. J. Money, Credit and Banking 44(1):149–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BBC News (2007) Italy retirement age ‘to go up'. (July 20), http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6908231.stm.Google Scholar
  • Canato A, Corrocher N (2004) Information and communication technology: Organizational challenges for Italian banks. Accounting, Bus. Financial Hist. 14(3):355–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X, Chen Y, Weinberg CB (2013) Learning about movies: The impact of movie release types on the nationwide box office. J. Culture Econom. 37(3):359–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT (2010a) Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):619–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT (2010b) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dayton CM, Macready GB (1988) Concomitant-variable latent-class models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 83(401):173–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta PK (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Jindal P (2012) The joint identification of utility and discount functions from stated choice data: An application to durable goods adoption. NBER Working Paper 18393, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang H, Keane M, Khwaja A, Salm M, Silverman D (2007) Testing the mechanisms of structural models: The case of the Mickey Mantle effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):53–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang H, Wang Y (2012) Estimating dynamic discrete choice models with hyperbolic discounting, with an application to mammography decisions. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Ferrari S, Verboven F, Degryse H (2010) Investment and usage of new technologies: Evidence from a shared ATM network. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1046–1079.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilly MC, Zeithaml V (1985) The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. J. Consumer Res. 12:353–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon BR (2009) A dynamic model of consumer replacement cycles in the PC processor industry. Marketing Sci. 28(5):846–867.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G, Rysman M (2012) Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1173–1219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G, Stavins J (2004) Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. RAND J. Econom. 35(2):260–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S, Chintagunta PK (1994) On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. J. Marketing Res. 31:128–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan TH, McDowell JM (1984) The determinants of technology adoption: The case of the banking firm. RAND J. Econom. 15(3):328–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan TH, McDowell JM (1987) Rival precedence and the dynamics of technology adoption: An empirical analysis. Economica 54(214):155–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatta K, Liyama Y (1991) Ergonomic study of automatic teller machine operability. Internat. J. Human Comput. Interaction 3(3):295–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hester DD, Calcagnini G, de Bonis R (2001) Competition through Innovation: ATMs in Italian banks. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti 3:359–381.Google Scholar
  • Houser D, Winter J (2004) How do behavioral assumptions affect structural inference? Evidence from a laboratory experiment. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 22(1):64–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurd MD, McGarry K (1995) Evaluation of the subjective probabilities of survival in the health and retirement study. J. Human Resources 30(Supplement):S268–S292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurd MD, McGarry K (2002) The predictive validity of subjective probabilities of survival. Econom. J. 112(482):966–985.Google Scholar
  • Huynh KP (2007) Financial innovation and the persistence of the extensive margin. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  • Ishihara M, Ching AT (2012) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2189871,Google Scholar
  • Ishii J (2007) Compatibility, competition, and investment in network industries: ATM networks in the banking industry. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Keane MP, Todd PE, Wolpin KI (2011) The structural estimation of behavioral models: Discrete choice dynamic programming methods and applications. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 331–461.Google Scholar
  • Kerschner PA, Chelsvig KH (1984) The aged user and technology, in Dunkle. Ruth E, Haug Marie R, Rosenberg M, eds. Communications Technology and the Elderly: Issues and Forecasts (Springer, New York), 135–144.Google Scholar
  • Khwaja A (2010) Estimating willingness to pay for Medicare using a dynamic life-cycle model of demand for health insurance. J. Econometrics 156(1):130–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyman E (2009) Italy not immune to crisis. ISN Security Watch, International Relations and Security Network. http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Articles/Detail/?Ing=en&id=95328.Google Scholar
  • Magnac T, Thesmar D (2002) Identifying dynamic discrete decision processes. Econometrica 70(2):801–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlandi E (1989) Computer Security Economics (ICCST, Zurich, Switzerland), 107–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford B (2001) The economics of consumer knowledge. J. Consumer Res. 27(4):397–411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers WA, Cabrera EF, Walker N, Gilbert DK, Fisk AD (1996) A survey of automatic teller machine usage across the adult life span. Human Factors 38(1):156–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rolfe R (2005) European Payment Cards Yearbook 2005–2006 (Payments CM LLP, Norfolk, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J, Phelan C (1997) How Social Security and Medicare affect retirement behavior in a world of incomplete markets. Econometrica 65(4):781–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan S, Tucker C (2012) Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):63–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saloner G, Shepard A (1995) Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. RAND J. Econom. 26(3):479–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sjuggerud S (2005) Interest rate forecast… The world's best prediction for 2005 will surprise you. The Investment U e-Letter (January 10).Google Scholar
  • Song I, Chintagunta PK (2003) A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(4):371–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sriram S, Chintagunta PK, Agarwal M (2010) Investigating consumer purchase behavior in related technology product categories. Marketing Sci. 29(2):291–314LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson CE, Kopecky KJ, Tucker A (1997) Technology adoption over the life cycle and aggregate technological progress. Southern Econom. J. 63(4):872–887.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tobin J (1956) The interest elasticity of transactions demand for cash. Rev. Econom. Statist. 38(3):241–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tufano P (2003) Financial innovation. Constantinides GM, Harris M, and Stulz RM, eds. The Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 307–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Viscusi WK, Huber J, Bell J (2008) Estimating discount rates for environmental quality from utility-based choice experiment. J. Risk Uncertainty 37(2–3):199–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wall Street Journal (2009) Paul Volcker: Think more boldly. (December 14), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704825504574586330960597134.html.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.