Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management

References

• Alonso R, Dessein W, Matouschek N (2008) When does coordination require centralization? Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1995) Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 28(3):337–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8/9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P, Rule J (1984) Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Comm. ACM 27(12):1184–1192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Prat A, Sadun R, Wulf J (2011) Span of control or span of activity? HBS Working Paper 12-053, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) How does information technology affect productivity? Plant level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1721–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett C, Ghosal S (1993) Beyond the M-form—Toward a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):23–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD (2011) Bringing organizational demography back in: Time, change and structure in top management team research. Carpenter M, ed. Handbook of Top Management Team Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2011) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. HBS Working Paper 11-023, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E (1994) Information assets, technology, and organization. Management Sci. 40(12):1645–1662.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Malone TW, Gurbaxani V, Kambil A (1994) Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. 40(12):1628–1644.Link, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WmG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Management 30(6):749–778.Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1991) The function of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management J. 12(S2):31–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collis DJ, Young D, Goold M (2007) The structure, size, and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Management J. 28(4):383–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer J, Garicano L, Prat A (2007) Language and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessein W, Galeotti A, Santos T (2013) Rational inattention and organizational focus. CEPR Discussion Paper DP9395, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2235493.Google Scholar
• Dessein W, Garicano L, Gertner R (2010) Organizing for synergies. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 2(4):77–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunne T, Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Troske K (2004) Wage and productivity dispersion in United States manufacturing: The role of computer investment. J. Labor Econom. 22(2):397–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan JPH, Lang LHP (2000) The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. J. Bus. 73(4):629–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA Jr (2009) Top management teams. Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (Oxford University Press, New York), 121–163.Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1971) Matrix organization designs—How to combine functional and project forms. Bus. Horizons 14(1):29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design—Information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Garicano L (2000) Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. 108(5):874–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerstner LV Jr (2002) Who Says Elephants Can't Dance? (Harper Collins, New York).Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Kelly LK, MacDonald B (2011) The new path to the C-Suite. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(3):60–68.Google Scholar
• Guadalupe M, Wulf J (2010) The flattening firm and product market competition: The effect of trade liberalization on corporate hierarchies. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(4):105–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V, Whang S (1991) The impact of information-systems on organizations and markets. Comm. Acm 34(1):59–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbold RJ (2002) Inside microsoft: Balancing creativity and discipline. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(1):72–79.Google Scholar
• Hill CWL (1988) Internal capital-market controls and financial performance in multidivisional firms. J. Indust. Econom. 37(1):67–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hoskisson RE (1987) Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Acad. Management Rev. 12(2):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE (1992) Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organ. Sci. 3(4):501–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Hounshell D, Smith JK Jr (1988) Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980 (University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• IBM (1994) 1994 annual report. International Business Machines, Armonk, New York.Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG (2005) Industry change through vertical disintegration: How and why markets emerged in mortgage banking. Acad. Management J. 48(3):465–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EE (1988) Substitutes for hierarchy. Organ. Dynam. 17(1):4–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberti JM, Mian AR (2009) Estimating the effect of hierarchies on information use. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(10):4057–4090.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM 30(6):484–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElheran K (2014) Delegation in multi-establishment firms: Adaptation vs. coordination in I.T. purchasing authority. J. Econom. Management Strategy. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menz M (2012) Functional top management team members: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. J. Management 38(1):45–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nath P, Mahajan V (2008) Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms' top management teams. J. Marketing 72(1):65–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neilson GL, Wulf J (2012) How many direct reports? Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(4):112–119.Google Scholar
• Palepu K (1985) Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure. Strategic Management J. 6(3):239–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piskorski M (2007) Procter & Gamble: Organization 2005 (A). HBS Case 9-707-519, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1985) The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Roland G, Xu C (2006) Coordination and experimentation in M-form and U-form organizations. J. Political Econom. 114(2):366–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R (1993) The organization of decentralized information-processing. Econometrica 61(5):1109–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Wulf JM (2006) The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):769–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rumelt R (1974) Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rumelt R (1982) Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management J. 3(4):359–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sah RK, Stiglitz JE (1986) The architecture of economic-systems—Hierarchies and polyarchies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):716–727.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1945) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sloan AP Jr (1963) My Years with General Motors (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Stein J (2002) Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized versus hierarchical firms. J. Finance 57(5):1891–1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Google Scholar
• Van Zandt T (1999) Real-time decentralized information processing as a model of organizations with boundedly rational agents. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(3):633–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wulf J (2012) The flattening firm—Not as advertised. California Management Rev. 55(1):5–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zorn DM (2004) Here a chief, there a chief: The rise of the CFO in the American firm. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):345–364.Crossref, Google Scholar