Crowding Out in the Labor Market: A Prosocial Setting Is Necessary

References

• Akerlof GA (1982) Labor contract as partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 97(4):543–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2005) Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(1):9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Yellen JL (1990) The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quart. J. Econom. 105(2):255–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):990–1008.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Kosfeld M (2006) The hidden costs of control. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1611–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Falk A (2002) Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(4):687–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2003) Theories of fairness and reciprocity: Evidence and economic applications. Hansen LP, Dewatripont M, Turnovsky S, ed. Advances in Economic Theory, Eighth World Congress of the Econometric Society (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 208–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L, Zehnder C (2009) The behavioral economics of the labor market: Central findings and their policy implications. Foote CL, Goette L, Meier S, eds. Policymaking Insight From Behavioral Economics (Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston), 355–384.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart. J. Econom. 108(2):437–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuster A, Meier S (2010) Another hidden cost of incentives: The detrimental effect on norm enforcement. Management Sci. 56(1):57–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Geanakoplos J, Pearce D, Stacchetti E (1989) Psychological games and sequential rationality. Games Econom. Behav. 1(1):60–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2003) The W effect of incentives. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rey-Biel P (2014) On the relative efficiency of performance pay and noncontingent incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(1):62–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goette L, Stutzer A (2008) Blood Donations and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment. IZA Discussion Paper 3580, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment. A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. 15(11):787–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hossain T, List JA (2012) The behavioralist visits the factory: Increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Management Sci. 58(12):2151–2167.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E (2012) Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Rev. Econom. 4(1):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, McConnell MA (2012) Hey look at me: The effect of giving circles on giving. NBER Working Paper 17737, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2012) The currency of reciprocity—Gift-exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2013) Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):853–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M (2010) Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(2):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and substitution effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2014) Rewarding volunteers: A field experiment. Management Sci. 60(5):1107–1129.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA (2006) The behavioralist meets the market: Measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. J. Political Econom. 114(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellstrom C, Johannesson M (2008) Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(4):845–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel J (2005) Interdependence preference and reciprocity. J. Econom. Literature 43(2):392–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Titmuss RM (1970) The Gift Relationship (G. Allen and Unwin, London).Google Scholar