Salesforce Compensation with Inventory Considerations

References

• Balasubramanian S, Bhardwaj P (2004) When not all conflict is bad: Manufacturing-marketing conflict and strategic incentive design. Management Sci. 50(4):489–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Basu AK, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Besbes O, Muharremoglu A (2013) On implications of demand censoring in the newsvendor problem. Management Sci. 59(6):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P (2001) Delagating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. 20(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Braden DJ, Freimer M (1991) Informational dynamics of censored observations. Management Sci. 37(11):1390–1404.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. de Kok AG, Graves SC, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management, Chap. 6 (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen F (2000) Sales-force incentives and inventory management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(2):186–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen F (2005) Salesforce incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning. Management Sci. 51(2):60–75.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Lai G (2013) Salesforce contracting under demand censorship. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(2):320–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2013) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Working paper, Harvard University, Boston. Google Scholar
• Desai P, Koenigsberg O, Purohit D (2007) The role of production lead time and demand uncertainty in durable goods market. Management Sci. 53(1):150–158.Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J, Steinberg R (1987) Marketing-production decisions in an industrial channel of distribution. Management Sci. 33(8):981–1000.Link, Google Scholar
• Felli L, Villas-Boas JM (2000) Renegotiation and collusion in organizations. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):453–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1990) Moral hazard and renegotiation in agency contracts. Econometrica 58(6):1279–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D (2004) Contracting under endogenous risk. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(4):321–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M, Raviv A (1979) Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory 20(2):231–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J, Simester D, Wernerfelt B (1994) Customer satisfaction incentives. Marketing Sci. 13(4):327–350.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Tang CS (2004) Introduction to the special issue on marketing and operations management interfaces and coordination. Management Sci. 50(4):429–430.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Narasimhan C, Niraj R (2007) Information and inventory in distribution channels. Management Sci. 53(10):1551–1561.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2012) Self-control and incentives: An analysis of multiperiod quota plans. Marketing Sci. 31(5):855–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Netessine S, Zhang ZJ (2010) Can we all get along? Incentive contracts to bridge the marketing and operations divide. Working paper, Columbia University, New York. Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Kalwani MU (1998) The role of bonus pay in salesforce compensation plans. Indust. Marketing Management 27(2):147–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SK (1997) Limited liability and bonus contracts. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(4):899–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kishore S, Rao RS, Narasimhan O, John G (2013) Bonuses versus commissions: A field study. J. Marketing Res. 50(3):317–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2001) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Misra S, Nair H (2011) A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(3):211–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netessine S, Taylor TA (2007) Product line design and production technology. Marketing Sci. 26(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2000) A theory of sales quotas with limited liability and rent sharing. J. Labor Econom. 18(3):405–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasternack BA (1985) Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. 4(2):166–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Park ES (1995) Incentive contracting under limited liability. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(3):477–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plambeck E, Zenios S (2003) Incentive efficient control of a make-to-stock production system. Oper. Res. 51(3):371–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju JS, Srinivasan V (1996) Quota-based compensation plans for multi-territory heterogeneous salesforces. Management Sci. 42(10):1454–1462.Link, Google Scholar
• Saghafian S, Chao X (2011) The impact of operational decisions on the design of salesforce incentives. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Google Scholar
• Sappington D (1983) Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J. Econom. Theory 29(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Coughlan AT, Savaskan RC (2009) Optimal restocking fees and information provision in an integrated supply-demand model of product returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Zhang J (2010) Why are bad products so hard to kill? Management Sci. 56(7):1161–1179.Link, Google Scholar
• Steenburgh TJ (2008) Effort or timing: The effect of lump-sum bonuses. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(3):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock A, Balachander S (2005) The making of a “hot product”: A signaling explanation of marketer's scarcity strategy. Management Sci. 51(8):1181–1192.Link, Google Scholar
• Zoltners AA, Sinha P, Lorimer SE (2008) Sales force effectiveness: A framework for researchers and practitioners. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 28(2):115–131.Crossref, Google Scholar