Comment on “A Model of Probabilistic Choice Satisfying First-Order Stochastic Dominance” by Pavlo Blavatskyy

References

• Bateman IJ, Day BH, Loomes G, Sugden R (2006) Ranking versus choice in the elicitation of preferences. Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norfolk, UK. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/academic/loomes/workingpapers/rankchoice.pdf.Google Scholar
• Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1963) Stochastic models of choice behavior. Behavioral Sci. 8(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blavatskyy PR (2011) A model of probabilistic choice satisfying first-order stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 57(3):542–548.Link, Google Scholar
• Buschena D, Zilberman D (2000) Generalized expected utility, heteroscedastic error, and path dependence in risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 20(1):67–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Waller WS (1986) Empirical tests of weighted utility theory. J. Math. Psych. 30(1):55–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G (2010) Modeling choice and valuation in decision experiments. Psych. Rev. 117(3):902–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1998) Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica 65(260):581–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Moffatt PG, Sugden R (2002) A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 24(2):103–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Machina M (1982) “Expected utility” analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50(2):277–323.Crossref, Google Scholar