A Bayesian Semiparametric Approach for Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in Choice Models

References

• Ansari A, Iyengar R (2006) Semiparametric Thurstonian models for recurrent choices: A Bayesian analysis. Psychometrika 71:631–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari A, Mela C (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40: 131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antoniak C (1974) Mixtures of Dirichlet processes with applications to Bayesian nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. 2:1152–1174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S (2003) Comment: Bayesian analysis of simultaneous demand and supply by Yang, Chen and Allenby. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1:285–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63:841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell D, MacQueen JB (1973) Ferguson distributions via Polya Urn schemes. Ann. Statist. 2:353–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27:745–748.Link, Google Scholar
• Burda M, Harding M, Hausman J (2008) A Bayesian mixed logit-probit model for multinomial choice. J. Econometrics 147: 232–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2010) Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28:619–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P (2001) Endogeneity and heterogeneity in a probit demand model: Estimation using aggregate data. Marketing Sci. 20:442–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P, Dubé JP, Goh KY (2005) Beyond the endogeneity bias: The effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household-level brand choice models. Management Sci. 51:832–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Hansen CB, McCulloch RE, Rossi PE (2008) A semi-parametric Bayesian approach to the instrumental variable problem. J. Econometrics 144:276–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Chintagunta P (2003) Comment: Bayesian analysis of simultaneous demand and supply by Yang, Chen and Allenby. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1:293–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson TS (1973) A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. 1:209–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher RA (1931) Properties of Hh functions. British Association Mathematical Tables, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Geweke J (1989) Bayesian inference in econometric models using Monte Carlo integration. Econometrica 57:1317–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geweke J, Keane MP (1999) Mixture of normals probit models. Hsiao C, Lahiri K, Lee LF, Pesaran MH, eds. Analysis of Panels and Limited Dependent Variable Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 49–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geweke J, Keane MP (2001) Computationally intensive methods for integration in econometrics. Heckman JJ, Leamer E, eds. Handbook of Econometrics (Elsevier Science, New York), 3463–3568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A, Petrin A (2004) The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable TV. Econometrica 72:351–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 3:203–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Hajivassiliou V, McFadden D (1998) The method of simulated scores for the estimation of LDV models. Econometrica 66:863–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1996) Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. Bresnahan TF, Gordon RJ, eds. The Economics of New Goods, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 58 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 209–247.Google Scholar
• Ishwaran H, James LF (2001) Gibbs sampling methods for stick-breaking priors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96:161–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishwaran H, Zarepour M (2000) Markov chain Monte Carlo in approximate Dirichlet and beta two-parameter process hierarchical models. Biometrika 87:371–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane MP (1994) A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. Econometrica 62:95–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JG, Menzefricke U, Feinberg FM (2004) Assessing heterogeneity in discrete choice models using a Dirichlet process prior. Rev. Marketing Sci. 2:1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2008) Endogeneity and individual consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. 45:702–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lijoi A, Mena RH, Prunster I (2005) Hierarchical mixture modeling with normalized inverse-gaussian priors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100:1278–1291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2001) Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69:307–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S, Gupta S (2009) Simulated maximum likelihood estimator for the random coefficient logit model using aggregate data. J. Marketing Res. 46:531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47:3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivers D, Vuong QH (1988) Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models. J. Econometrics 39:347–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodríguez A, Dunson DB (2011) Nonparametric Bayesian models through probit stick-breaking processes. Bayesian Anal. 6:145–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman J (1994) A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors. Statistica Sinica 4:639–650.Google Scholar
• Song I (2010) Item aggregates and price elasticity. Seoul J. Bus. 16:45–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song PX-K (2000) Multivariate dispersion models generated from Gaussian copula. Scandinavian J. Statist. 27:305–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. Royal Statist. Soc., Series B 64:583–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K (2001) Structural analysis of manufacturer pricing in the presence of a strategic retailer. Marketing Sci. 20:244–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (2007) A note on limited versus full information estimation in non-linear models. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1994) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1999) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. 45:1324–1338.Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Zhao Y (2005) Retailer, manufacturers, and individual consumers: Modeling the supply side in the ketchup marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 42:83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watanabe S (2010) Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. J. Machine Learn. Res. 11:3571–3594.Google Scholar
• Yang M, Dunson DB (2010) Bayesian semiparametric structural equation models with latent variables. Psychometrika 75:675–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Dunson DB, Baird D (2010) Semiparametric Bayes hierarchical models with mean and variance constraints. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 54:2172–2186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Chen Y, Allenby GM (2003) Bayesian analysis of simultaneous demand and supply. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1:251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar