Home or Overseas? An Analysis of Sourcing Strategies Under Competition
Published Online:27 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1823
References
- (2007) The strategic peril of delayed differentiation. Management Sci. 53(5):697–712.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Strategic information management under leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 55(3):438–452.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Regional clusters in a global world: Production relocation, innovation, and industrial decline. California Management Rev. 49(1):101–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Will costs drive firms home? Wall Street Journal (May 5).Google Scholar
- (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves S, de Kok T, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Competition and outsourcing with scale economies. Management Sci. 48(10):1314–1333.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) The impact of quick response in inventory-based competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(3):409–429.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Offshoring of production—A European perspective. Eur. Manufacturing Survey (May, Bulletin No. 2).Google Scholar
- (1994) Asymmetric information acquisition and behavior in role choice models: An endogenously generated signaling game. Internat. Econom. Rev. 35(4):795–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) It may be cheaper to manufacture at home. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(10):84–87.Google Scholar
- (2012) Why Apple and GE are bringing back manufacturing. Forbes (December 7).Google Scholar
- (1986) Comparative statics for oligopoly. Internat. Econom. Rev. 27(1):107–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Supply contract competition and sourcing strategies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 2(4):350–371.Link, Google Scholar
- (1969) A note on the posterior mean of a population mean. J. Royal Statist. Soc. 31(2):332–334.Google Scholar
- (2005) Offshoring: Value creation through economic change. J. Management Stud. 42(3):675–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The strategic perils of low cost outsourcing. Management Sci. 58(6):1196–1210.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Does offshoring still make sense? Supply Chain Management Rev. 13(1):20–27.Google Scholar
- (1997) What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(2):105–116.Google Scholar
- (1991) On strategic cost increases in a duopoly. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 9(3):389–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) First mover and second mover advantage. Internat. Econom. Rev. 26(3):649–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27(4):642–658.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Time to rethink offshoring? McKinsey Quart. (September).Google Scholar
- (2007) Strategic technology choice and capacity investment under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. 53(2):192–207.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Management Sci. 57(3):566–581.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Managing global sourcing: Inventory performance. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print December 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1816.Google Scholar
- (1992) Effects of cost changes on oligopolists' profits. J. Indust. Econom. 40(4):441–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Making it safe to rely on a single partner. Financial Times (April 1).Google Scholar
- (1985) Cournot oligopoly with information sharing. RAND J. Econom. 16(4):521–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Sci. 54(8):1467–1481.Link, Google Scholar
- (1987) Optimal research for Cournot oligopolists. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):140–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The benefits of competitive upward channel decentralization. Management Sci. 57(4):741–751.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Offshoring by U.S. companies doubles. Industry Week (August 19).Google Scholar
- (1982) Fulfilled expectations Cournot duopoly with information acquisition and release. Bell J. Econom. 13(1):214–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Plunkett's Outsourcing and Offshoring Industry Almanac (Plunkett Research, Houston).Google Scholar
- (1996) A general model of information sharing in oligopoly. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):260–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Pace-setting Zara seeks more speed to fight its rising cheap-chic rivals. Wall Street Journal (February 20).Google Scholar
- (2012) Obama's visit secures more attention for Master Lock. The Business Journal (February 12).Google Scholar
- (2010) From offshoring to nearshoring: Understanding the shifting sourcing dynamics. Logist. Viewpoints (October 26).Google Scholar
- (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Does a manufacturer benefit from selling to a better-forecasting retailer? Management Sci. 56(9):1584–1598.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Operations Strategy: Principles and Practice (Dynamic Ideas, Belmont, MA).Google Scholar
- (1988) Aggregation of information in large Cournot markets. Econometrica 56(4):851–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Oligopoly Pricing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2013) The effect of competition on the efficient–responsive choice. Production Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print October 21, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/poms.12093/abstract.Google Scholar
- (2010) A new outsourcing trend in manufacturing: Cost estimating. Report, MTI Systems, West Springfield, MA.Google Scholar

