Gender Interactions Within the Family Firm

References

• Adams R, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62:217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams R, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams R, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58:219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Adams R, Gray S, Nowland J (2012) Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. Working paper, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
• Adams R, Hermalin BJ, Weisbach MS (2010) The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. J. Econom. Literature 48:58–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127:137–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Minichilli A, Corbetta G (2011) How do managerial successions shape corporate financial policies in family firms? J. Corporate Finance 17:1016–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Reeb D (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance 58:1301–1329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Reeb D (2004) Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49:209–237.Google Scholar
• Anderson R, Duru A, Reeb D (2009) Founders, heirs, and corporate opacity in the United States. J. Financial Econom. 92:205–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andres C (2008) Large shareholders and firm performance—An empirical examination of founding-family ownership. J. Corporate Finance 14:431–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58:78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58:277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Wolfenzon D (2000) The balance of power in closely held corporations. J. Financial Econom. 58:113–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Nielsen K, Kongsted H (2008) The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms. J. Banking Finance 32:1098–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Perez-Gonzalez F, Wolfenzon D (2009) Do CEOs matter? Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Perez-Gonzalez F, Wolfenzon D (2012) Estimating the value of the boss: Evidence from CEO hospitalization events. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Nielsen K, Perez-Gonzalez F, Wolfenzon D (2007) Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quart. J. Econom. 122:647–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock KF (2001) The gender gap in corporate jobs. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55:3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118:1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bianco M, Ciavarella A, Signoretti R (2011) Women on boards in Italy. Working paper, Bank of Italy, Rome.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau F, Ferber MA (1986) The Economics of Women, Men and Work (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122: 1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth AL, Nolen P (2012) Choosing to compete: How different are boys and girls? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81:542–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2012) Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83:50–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47:1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta N, Asgari S (2004) Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40:642–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31:305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dezso CL, Ross GD (2012) Does female representation in top management affect firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33:1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2001) Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Econom. Inquiry 31:171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Confederation of Directors' Associations (ecoDa) (2010) Corporate governance guidance and principles for unlisted companies in Europe. Discussion paper, ecoDa, Brussels, Belgium. http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/ecoda_unlisted_companies_mar2010_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Faccio M, Lang L (2002) The ultimate ownership of Western Europe corporations. J. Financial Econom. 65:365–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faccio M, Marchica MT, Mura R (2011) CEO gender, corporate risk taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Working paper, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
• Gagliarducci S, Paserman DM (2012) Gender interactions within hierarchies: Evidence from the political arena. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79:1021–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 94: 377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard K, List J (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77:1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118:1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greig F, Bonhet I (2009) Exploring gendered behavior in the field with experiments: Why public goods are provided by women in a Nairobi slum. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 70:1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Rustichini A (2011) What drives women out of entrepreneurship? The joint role of testosterone and culture. CEPR Discussion Paper 8204, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK.Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn S, Oosterbeek H, van Praag M (2013) The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 59:1514–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang J, Kisgen DJ (2013) Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? J. Financial Econom. 108:822–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iriberri N, Rey-Biel P (2012) Let's not talk about sex: The effect of information provision on gender differences in performance under competition. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.Google Scholar
• Koenig AM, Eagly AH, Mitchell AA, Ristikari T (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psych. Bull. 137:616–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J. Finance 54:471–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa D, Miller A (2011) Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 101:635–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa D, Miller A (2012) Workforce reductions at women-owned businesses in the United States. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsa D, Miller A (2013) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 5:136–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Minichilli A, Corbetta G (2013) Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic Management J. 34:553–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122:1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Gonzales F (2006) Inherited control and firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96:1559–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Price CR (2012) Gender, competition, and managerial decisions. Management Sci. 58:114–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Association 10:1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tate G, Yang L (2011) Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure. Working paper, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
• Van den Berghe L (2010) Good governance in unlisted companies. Discussion paper, 9th European Conference on Corporate Governance, June 28–29, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
• Villalonga B, Amit R (2006) How do family ownership, management and control affect firm value? J. Financial Econom. 80:385–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity and new director selection. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40:60–83.Crossref, Google Scholar