The Judgment of Garbage: End-of-Pipe Treatment and Waste Reduction

References

• Alles M, Amershi A, Datar S, Sarkar R (2000) Information and incentive effects of inventory in JIT production. Management Sci. 46:1528–1544.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashford NA, Heaton GR Jr (1983) Regulation and technological innovation in the chemical industry. Law and Contemporary Problems 46:109–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avila JA, Whitehead BW (1993) What is environmental strategy? McKinsey Quart. 4:53–68.Google Scholar
• Benson PG, Saraph JV, Schroeder RG (1991) The effects of organizational context on quality management: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 37:1107–1124.Link, Google Scholar
• Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: What about the rebound effect? Ecological Econom. 36:119–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cebon PB (1992) 'Twixt cup and lip organizational behaviour, technical prediction and conservation practice. Energy Policy 20:802–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clelland IJ, Dean TJ, Douglas TJ (2000) Stepping towards sustainable business: An evaluation of waste minimization practices in US manufacturing. Interfaces 30(3):107–124.Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett CJ, Klassen RD (2006) Extending the horizons: Environmental environmental excellence as key to improving operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8:5–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1986) Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. 32:1301–1315.Link, Google Scholar
• Florida RL (1996) Lean and green: The move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. Calif. Management Rev. 39: 80–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1994) A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J. Oper. Management 11:339–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghassemi A (2002) Handbook of Pollution Control and Waste Minimization (Marcel Dekker, New York).Google Scholar
• Gomes E (2012) Personal correspondence with authors, March 30.Google Scholar
• Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Management Rev. 20:986–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38:79–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2011) ISO 14000—Environmental management. Accessed January 9, 2014, http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso14000.htm.Google Scholar
• Jaber MY, Guiffrida AL (2008) Learning curves for imperfect production processes with reworks and process restoration interruptions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189:93–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemp R (2000) Technology and environmental policy: Innovation effects of past policies and suggestions for improvement. Innovation and the Environment (OECD, Paris), 35–61.Google Scholar
• Kesavan S, Gaur V, Raman A (2010) Do inventory and gross margin data improve sales forecasts for U.S. public retailers? Management Sci. 56:1519–1533.Link, Google Scholar
• King A (1995a) Avoiding ecological surprise: Lessons from long-standing communities. Acad. Management Rev. 20:961–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A (1995b) Innovation from differentiation: Pollution control departments and innovation in the printed circuit industry. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 42:270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A (1999) Retrieving and transferring embodied data: Implications for the management of interdependence within organizations. Management Sci. 45:918–935.Link, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox MJ (2001) Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production Oper. Management 10:244–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox MJ (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48:289–299.Link, Google Scholar
• Klassen RD, Whybark DC (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Management J. 42:599–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Sustainable operations management. Production Oper. Management 14:482–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Veloso FM, Hounshell DA (2011) Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry. Res. Policy 40:1240–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G, Rajagopalan S (1998) Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Sci. 44:1517.Link, Google Scholar
• Ligon P (2011) Personal correspondence with authors, November 11.Google Scholar
• Ligon P (2012) Personal correspondence with authors, October 16.Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP (1997) The road to “root cause”: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Sci. 43: 479–502.Link, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP, Helper S (1997) Creating lean suppliers: Diffusing lean production through the supply chain. Calif. Management Rev. 39:118–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marchi SD, Hamilton JT (2006) Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. J. Risk Uncertainty 32:57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment (1986) Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture, Vol. NTIS PB86-184637 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment (1994) Industry, Technology and the Environment: Competitive Challenges and Business Opportunities, Vol. OTA-ITE-586 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Pil FK, Rothenberg S (2003) Environmental performance as a driver of superior quality. Production Oper. Management 12:404–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econom. Perspect. 9:97–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rondinelli DA, Berry MA (2000) Corporate environmental management and public policy—Bridging the gap. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 44:168–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg S (2003) Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI. J. Management Stud. 40:1783–1802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothenberg S, Pil FK, Maxwell J (2001) Lean, green, and the quest for superior environmetal performance. Production Oper. Management 10:228–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samson D, Terziovski M (1999) The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. J. Oper. Management 17:393–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2001) An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 135:102–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Cordeiro JJ (2009) Investigating technical and ecological efficiencies in the electricity generation industry: Are there win-win opportunities? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 60:1160–1172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma HC (2001) Role of pollution prevention in waste management/environmental restoration. Ghassemi A, ed. Handbook of Pollution Control and Waste Minimization, Vol. 8 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Toffel MW (2013) Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Spear SJ (2002) The essence of just-in-time: Embedding diagnostic tests in work-systems to achieve operational excellence. Production Planning and Control 13:754–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Brunner DJ, Upton DM (2011) Lean principles, learning, and knowledge work: Evidence from a software services provider. J. Oper. Management 29:376–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terlaak A, King A (2006) The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 Quality Management Standard: A signaling approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60:579–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theyel G (2000) Management practices for environmental innovation and performance. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 20:249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1996) 1996 Toxic Release Inventory: Data Quality Report (EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2006) Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting Forms and Instructions—Revised 2005 Version (EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC). http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/ry2005rfi.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2011) 2012 Environmental Management Systems (EMS) (EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (1997) Environmental protection: Challenges facing EPA's efforts to reinvent environmental regulation. Office GA, ed., Vol. GAO/RCED-97-155 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Tyre MJ (1996) The mechanics of learning by doing: Problem discovery during process machine use. Tech. Culture 37:312–329.Crossref, Google Scholar