Eliciting Prospect Theory When Consequences Are Measured in Time Units: “Time Is Not Money”

References

• Abdellaoui M (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. 46(11):1497–1512.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, L'Haridon O (2008) A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion in prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):245–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1659–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Diecidue E, Öncüler A (2011a) Risk preferences at different time periods: An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 57(5):975–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, L'Haridon O, Paraschiv C (2011b) Experience-based vs. description-based decision making: Do we need two different prospect theory specifications? Management Sci. 57(10):1879–1895.Link, Google Scholar
• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker P (2011c) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abellan-Perpiñan JM, Bleichrodt H, Pinto-Prades JL (2009) The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement. J. Health Econom. 28(6):1039–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Zakay D (2001) A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta Psychologica 108(2):187–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bates DM (2005) Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News 5(1):27–30.Google Scholar
• Bates DM, Sarkar D (2005) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.9975-7.Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL (2000) A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. 46(11):1485–1496.Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H, Cillo A, Diecidue E (2010) A quantitative measurement of regret theory. Management Sci. 56(1):161–175.Link, Google Scholar
• Booij AS, van Praag BMS, van de Kuilen G (2010) A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population. Theory Decision 68(1–2):115–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Palma A, Picard N (2005) Route choice decision under travel time uncertainty. Trans. Res. Part A: Policy Practice 39(4):295–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert JEJ, Prelec D (2007) The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Sci. 53(9):1423–1438.Link, Google Scholar
• Etchart-Vincent N, L'Haridon O (2011) Monetary incentives in the loss domain: An experimental comparison of three rewarding schemes including real losses. J. Risk Uncertainty 42(1):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennema H, Van Assen M (1998) Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method. J. Risk Uncertainty 17(3):277–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn PC, Kochenberger GA (1979) Two-piece von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. Decision Sci. 10(4):503–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein WM, Einhorn HJ (1987) Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psych. Rev. 94(2):236–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):129–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Fredrickson LB, Schreiber AC, Redelmeier D (1993) When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psych. Sci. 4(6):401–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Kemel E, Travers M (2013) Comparing attitudes towards time and money in experienced risk. Working paper, HEC Paris, Jouy en Josas, Cedex, France.Google Scholar
• Leclerc F, Schmitt BH, Dube L (1995) Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? J. Consumer Res. 22(1):110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noland R, Polak J (2002) Travel time variability: A review of theoretical and empirical issues. Transport Rev. 22(1):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onay S, Öncüler A (2007) Intertemporal choice under timing risk: An experimental approach. J. Risk Uncertainty 34(2):99–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senna LADS (1994) The influence of travel time variability on the value of time. Transportation 21(2):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D (2001) The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. J. Behav. Decision Making 14(3):169–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature 38(2):332–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Gonzalez R (1996) Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. 42(12):1676–1690.Link, Google Scholar
• Zeckhauser R (1973) Time as the ultimate source of utility. Quart. J. Econom. 87(4):668–675.Crossref, Google Scholar