The Ability of Global Stock Exchange Mechanisms to Mitigate Home Bias: Evidence from Euronext

References

• Ahearne A, Griever W, Warnock F (2004) Information costs and home bias: An analysis of US holdings of foreign equities. J. Internat. Econom. 62(2):313–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amadi A (2004) Equity home bias: A disappearing phenomenon? Working paper, University of California, Davis, Davis.Google Scholar
• Armstrong C, Jagolinzer A, Larcker D (2010) Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities. J. Accounting Res. 48(2):225–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh H, Gassen J, LaFond R (2006) Does stock price synchronicity represent firm-specific information? The international evidence. Research Paper, MIT Sloan, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Balli F, Basher A, Ozer-Balli H (2010) From home bias to euro bias: Disentangling the effects of monetary union on the European financial markets. J. Econom. Bus. 62(5):347–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish M, Yohn T (2008) Information friction and investor home bias: A perspective on the effect of global IFRS adoption on the extent of equity home bias. J. Accounting Public Policy 27(6):433–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish M, Miller B, Yohn T (2010) The effect of IFRS adoption on cross-border investment in equity and debt markets. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Bushee B, Miller G (2004) Accounting choice, home bias, and U.S. investment in non-U.S. firms. J. Accounting Res. 42(5):795–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruggemann U, Daske H, Homburg C, Pope P (2012) How do individual investors react to global IFRS adoption? Working paper, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin.Google Scholar
• Christensen H, Hail L, Leuz C (2011) Capital market effects of securities regulation: The role of implementation and enforcement. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper I, Kaplanis E (1994) Home bias in equity portfolios, inflation hedging, and international capital market equilibrium. Rev. Financial Stud. 7(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Covrig V, DeFond M, Hung M (2007) Home bias, foreign mutual fund holdings, and the voluntary adoption of international accounting standards. J. Accounting Res. 45(1):41–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlquist M, Pinkowitz L, Stulz R, Williamson R (2003) Corporate governance and the home bias. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 38(1):87–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeFond M, Hu X, Hung M, Li S (2011) The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on foreign mutual fund ownership: The role of comparability. J. Accounting Econom. 51(3):240–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doidge C, Karolyi GA, Stulz R (2004) Why are foreign firms listed in the U.S. worth more? J. Financial Econom. 71(2):205–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2006) Stock exchanges: The battle of the bourses. (May 29), http://www.economist.com/node/11455085.Google Scholar
• Euronext N.V. (2001) Annual report 2001, March 7. Euronext, Paris.Google Scholar
• Florou A, Pope P (2012) Mandatory IFRS adoption and institutional investment decisions. Accounting Rev. 87(6):1993–2025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• French K, Poterba J (1991) Investor diversification and international equity markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):222–226.Google Scholar
• Grundfest J (1990) Internationalization of the world's securities markets: Economic causes and regulatory consequences. J. Financial Services Res. 4:349–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo S, Fraser M (2010) Propensity Score Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Hamberg M, Mavruk T, Sjoegren S (2009) Did the adoption of IFRS reduce investors' home bias? Working paper, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
• Jackson H, Roe M (2009) Public and private enforcement of securities laws: Resource-based evidence. J. Financial Econom. 93(2):207–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeske K (2001) Equity home bias: Can information cost explain the puzzle? Econom. Rev. Q3:31–42.Google Scholar
• Kang J, Stulz R (1997) Why is there home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. J. Financial Econom. 46(1):3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karolyi G (2012) Corporate governance, agency problems and international cross-listings: A defense of the bonding hypothesis. Emerging Markets Rev. 13(4):516–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (1981) Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semi-logarithmic equations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(4):801–802.Google Scholar
• Lang M, Raedy J, Yetman M (2003) How representative are firms that are cross-listed in the United States? An analysis of accounting quality. J. Accounting Res. 41(2):363–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker D, Rusticus T (2010) On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. J. Accounting Econom. 49(3):186–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C (2010) Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting Bus. Res. 40(3):229–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C, Lins K, Warnock F (2010) Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms? Rev. Financial Stud. 23(3):3245–3285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (1999) Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. J. Econom. Literature 37(2):571–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Licht A (1998) Stock market integration in Europe. Consulting Assistance on Economic Reform II Discussion Paper No. 15, Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Malkamäki M (1999) Are there economies of scale in stock exchange activities? Working paper, Studies in Economics and Finance, Bank of Finland, Helsinki, Finland.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin P, Rey H (2004) Financial super-markets: Size matters for asset trade. J. Internat. Econom. 64(2):335–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAndrews J, Stefanadis C (2002) The consolidation of European stock exchanges. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Current Issues Econom. Finance 8(6):1–6.Google Scholar
• Merton R (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J. Finance 42(3):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D (1999) The market reaction to international cross-listings: Evidence from depository receipts. J. Financial Econom. 51(1):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MSCI (2013) MSCI World Index. Report, MSCI, New York. http://msci.com/resources/factsheets/index_fact_sheets/msci-world-index.pdf.Google Scholar
• Nielsson U (2009) Stock exchange merger and liquidity: The case of Euronext. J. Financial Markets 12(2):229–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poser NS (2001) The stock exchanges of the United States and Europe: Automation, globalization and consolidation. U. Pa. J. Int'l. Econom. L. 22:497–540.Google Scholar
• Pownall G, Vulcheva M, Wang X (2013) The effects of the integration of the Euronext stock market on liquidity and financial reporting quality of listed firms. Working paper, Emory University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Reuters News (2002) Euroclear cuts foreign fees for French shares. (June 27), http://global.factiva.com.proxy.library.emory.edu/ha/default.aspx.Google Scholar
• Roberts M, Whited T (2012) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Schmiedel H, Schönenberger A (2005) Integration of securities market infrastructures in the euro area. Occasional Paper 33, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
• Thomson Financial (2003) Thomson ONE Banker—Ownership Module. Report, Thomson Finanical, New York. http://www.tfsd.com/marketing/banker_r2/T1B_ownership_factsheet.pdf.Google Scholar
• World Federation of Exchanges (2009) Equity market annual statistics report. World Federation of Exchanges, Paris.Google Scholar
• Yu G (2010) Accounting standards and international portfolio holdings: Analysis of cross-border holdings following mandatory adoption of IFRS. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar