Split-Award Auctions for Supplier Retention

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1835

References

  • Anton JJ, Yao DA (1992) Coordination in split award auctions. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):681–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anton JJ, Brusco S, Lopomo G (2010) Split-award procurement auctions with uncertain scale economies: Theory and data. Games and Economic Behav. 69(1):24–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babich V, Burnetas AN, Ritchken PH (2007) Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(2):123–146.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bagnoli M, Bergstrom T (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory 26(2):445–469.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beall S, Carter C, Carter PL, Germer T, Hendrick T, Jap S, Kaufmann L, Maciejewski D, Monczka R, Petersen K (2003) The Role of Reverse Auctions in Strategic Sourcing (Center for Advanced Procurement Studies Research, Tempe, AZ).Google Scholar
  • Chaturvedi A, Martínez-de-Albéniz V (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F (2007) Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. 53(10): 1562–1576.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta S, Spulber DF (1990) Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy 4(1):5–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David HA, Nagaraja HN (2003) Order Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duenyas I, Hu B, Beil DR (2013) Simple auctions for supply contracts. Management Sci. 59(10):2332–2342.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W, Oh SK (2004) Procurement auctions and eroding price contracts in the presence of learning by doing. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Federgruen A, Yang N (2009) Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Oper. Res. 57(6):1451–1468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Held CM, Ferguson ME, Atasu A (2008) Repeat procurement auctions with bidder defections. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production Oper. Management 14(1):53–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klotz DE, Chatterjee K (1995a) Dual sourcing in repeated procurement competitions. Management Sci. 41(8):1317–1327.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klotz DE, Chatterjee K (1995b) Variable split awards in a single-stage procurement model. Group Decision Negotiation 4(4): 295–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li C, Debo LG (2009) Second sourcing vs. sole sourcing with capacity investment and asymmetric information. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 3(11):448–470.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee RP, McMillan J (1987) Auctions with entry. Econom. Lett. 23:343–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mookherjee D, Reichelstein S (1992) Dominant strategy implementation of Bayesian incentive compatible allocation rules. J. Econom. Theory 56(2):378–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers R (2007) Food fights. CFO Magazine 23:70–74.Google Scholar
  • Myerson R (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6:58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Seshadri S, Chatterjee K, Lilien GL (1991) Multiple source procurement competitions. Marketing Sci. 10(3):246–263.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked M, Shanthikumar JG (1988) Stochastic convexity and its applications. Adv. Appl. Probab. 20(2):427–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B (2006) On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. 52(5):639–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wan Z, Beil DR (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Z, Aydın G, Babich V, Beil DR (2012) Using a dual-sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: Competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):202–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.