Compensation and Peer Effects in Competing Sales Teams

References

• Albers S, Mantrala M (2008) Models for sales management decisions. Wierenga B, ed. Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (Springer, Berlin), 163–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson G (2005) Boutiques “r” in at Bloomie's and field's. RetailWire (August 11), http://www.retailwire.com/discussion/10840/boutiques-r-in-at-bloomies-and-fields.Google Scholar
• Anderson G (2006) J.C. Penney gives Sephora store-within-store space. RetailWire (April 12), http://www.retailwire.com/discussion/11344/j-c-penney-gives-sephora-store-within-store-space.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Zivin JG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baggs J, de Bettignies J (2007) Product market competition and agency costs. J. Indust. Econom. 55(2):289–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917–962.Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):417–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron MJ, Gjerde KP (1997) Peer pressure in an agency relationship. J. Labor Econom. 15(2):234–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu A, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P (2001) Delegating pricing decisions. Marketing Sci. 20(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boning B, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) Opportunity counts: Teams and the effectiveness of production incentives. J. Labor Econom. 25(4):613–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucheli M, Mahoney J, Vaaler P (2010) Chandler's living history: The visible hand of vertical integration in nineteenth century America viewed under a twenty-first century transaction costs economics lens. J. Management Stud. 47(5):859–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buttrick J (1952) The inside contracting system. J. Econom. History 12(5):205–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen K (2003) Sabotage in promotion tournaments. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 19(1):119–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2014) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Sci. 33(2):165–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Coughlan A, Sen S (1989) Salesforce compensation: Theory and managerial implications. Marketing Sci. 8(4):324–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Davidson R, MacKinnon J (1993) Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Drago R, Turnbull G (1987) An analysis of non-insurance work incentives. Econom. Lett. 23(3):301–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drago R, Turnbull G (1988) The incentive effects of tournaments with positive externalities among workers. Southern Econom. J. 55(1):100–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A, Bohmer RM, Pisano G (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gant J, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2002) Social capital and organizational change in high-involvement and traditional work organizations. J. Econom. Management Strategy 11(2):289–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D (2003) In the eye of the beholder: An analysis of the relative value of a top sales rep across firms and products. Marketing Sci. 22(2):161–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Gould ED, Pashigian BP, Prendergast C (2005) Contracts, externalities, and incentives in shopping malls. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(3):411–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111(3):465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13(2):324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1990) Regulating trade among agents. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. 146(1):85–105.Google Scholar
• Huckman R, Staats B (2011) Fluid tasks and fluid teams: Impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(3):310–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Huckman R, Staats B, Upton D (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.Link, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K (1999) The effects of human resource management systems on economic performance: An international comparison of U.S. and Japanese plants. Management Sci. 45(5):704–721.Link, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Gant J (2003) Working smarter by working together: Connective capital in the workplace. Working paper, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):291–313.Google Scholar
• Itoh H (1991) Incentives to help in multi-agent situations. Econometrica 59(3):611–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Itoh H (1992) Cooperation in hierarchical organizations: An incentive perspective. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 8(2):321–345.Google Scholar
• Itoh H (1993) Coalitions, incentives, and risk sharing. J. Econom. Theory 60(2):410–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2012) Self-control and incentives: An analysis of multiperiod quota plans. Marketing Sci. 31(5):855–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Zhang Z (2010) Store within a store. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):748–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Kalwani M (1998) The role of bonus pay in salesforce compensation plans. Indust. Marketing Management 27(2):147–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Thevaranjan A (1998) Monitoring and incentives in sales organizations: An agency-theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 17(2):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Kandel E, Lazear EP (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100(4):801–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KC D, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others' failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.Link, Google Scholar
• Kishore S, Rao RS, Narasimhan O, John G (2013) Bonuses versus commissions: A field study. J. Marketing Res. 50(3):317–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez M, Simester D (2001) Firm-wide incentives and mutual monitoring at Continental Airlines. J. Labor Econom. 19(4):743–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Zirulia L (2012) Individual preferences, organization, and competition in a model of R&D incentive provision. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84(2):550–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R (1986) Delegating pricing responsibility to the salesforce. Marketing Sci. 5(2):159–168.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plan for single- and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.Link, Google Scholar
• Larkin I (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (1989) Pay equality and industrial politics. J. Political Econom. 97(3):561–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL (2007) Personnel economics: The economist's view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(4):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard J, Levine D (2006) The effect of diversity on turnover: Evidence from a very large case study. Indust. Relations Labor Rev. 59(4):547–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Chan T, Lewis M (2010) What happens when manufacturers perform the retailing functions? An empirical study of a new channel structure in a retail store. Working paper, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ahearne M, Ham S (2009) Designing sales contests: Does the prize structure matter? J. Marketing Res. 46(3):356–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantrala MK, Sinha P, Zoltners AA (1994) Structuring a multiproduct sales quota-bonus plan for a heterogeneous sales force: A practical model-based approach. Marketing Sci. 13(2):121–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Mantrala MK, Albers S, Caldieraro F, Jensen O, Joseph K, Krafft M, Narasimhan Cet al. (2010) Sales force modeling: State of the field and research agenda. Marketing Lett. 21(3):255–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):511–528.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra S, Nair H (2011) A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(3):211–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra S, Coughlan A, Narasimhan C (2005) Salesforce compensation: An analytical and empirical examination of the agency theoretic approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(1):5–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra BK, Prasad A (2004) Centralized pricing versus delegating pricing to the salesforce under information asymmetry. Marketing Sci. 23(1):21–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelder J, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7(4):308–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2012) Incentive life-cycles: Learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):305–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (1998) Fiscal year ends and non-linear incentive contracts: The effect on business seasonality. Quart. J. Econom. 113(1):149–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccolo S, D'Amato M, Martina R (2008) Product market competition and organizational slack under profit-target contracts. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(6):1389–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snyder J (2008) Ethical spillovers in firms: Evidence from vehicle emissions testing. Management Sci. 54(11):1891–1903.Link, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP, Boehmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Raith M (2003) Competition, risk, and managerial incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(4):1425–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju JS, Srinivasan V (1996) Quota-based compensation plans for multiterritory heterogeneous salesforces. Management Sci. 42(10):1454–1462.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao RC (1990) Compensating heterogeneous salesforces: Some explicit solutions. Marketing Sci. 9(4):319–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt K (1997) Managerial incentives and product market competition. Rev. Econom. Stud. 64(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Segalla M, Rouzies D, Besson M, Weitz B (2006) A cross-national investigation of incentive sales compensation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 23(4):419–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Balasubramanian S, Roth AV (2007) Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping, and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. 53(10):1533–1550.Link, Google Scholar
• Steenburgh T (2008) Effort or timing: The effect of lump-sum bonuses. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(3):235–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldinger F (2012) Peer effects in science: Evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(2):838–861.Crossref, Google Scholar