Are People Risk Vulnerable?

References

• Arrow KJ (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bchir MA, Willinger M (2013) Does the exposure to natural hazards affect risk and time preferences? Some insights from a field experiment in Peru. LAMETA Working Paper 2013-04, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
• Cameron L, Shah M (2012) Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. IZA Discussion Paper 6756 IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Gneezy U (2010) Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: An experiment. Econom. Inquiry 48:133–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew SH, Epstein L, Segal U (1987) Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank-dependent probabilities. J. Econom. Theory 42:370–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana R-A, Scarsini M (2007) Optimal risk sharing with background risk. J. Econom. Theory 133:152–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doherty N, Schlesinger H (1983) Optimal insurance in incomplete markets. J. Political Econom. 91:1045–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Kimball MS (1992) Background risk, prudence, and the demand for insurance. Dionne G, ed. Contributions to Insurance Economics (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 239–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelshtain I, Chalfant JA (1993) Portfolio choices in the presence of other risks. Management Sci. 39:925–936.Link, Google Scholar
• Franke G, Stapleton RC, Subrahmanyam MG (1998) Who buys and who sells options: The role of options in an economy with background risk. J. Econom. Theory 82:89–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke G, Stapelton RC, Subrahmanyam MG (2004) Background risk and the demand for state-contingent claims. Econom. Theory 23:321–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Potters J (1997) An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quart. J. Econom. 112:631–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard K, List J (2009) Gender and competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77:1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C (1996) Decreasing absolute prudence: Characterization and applications to second-best risk sharing. Eur. Econom. Rev. 40:1799–1815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C, Pratt J (1996) Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64:1109–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Paiella M (2008) Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6:1109–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guiso L, Jappelli T, Terlizzese D (1996) Income risk, borrowing constraints and portfolio choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86:158–172.Google Scholar
• Haigh M, List J (2005) Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance 60:523–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G, List J, Towe C (2007) Naturally occurring preferences and exogenous laboratory experiments: A case study of risk aversion. Econometrica 75:433–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaton J, Lucas D (1997) Market frictions, saving behavior, and portfolio choice. Macroeconom. Dynam. 1:76–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaton J, Lucas D (2000) Portfolio choice in the presence of background risk. Econom. J. 110:1–26.Google Scholar
• Herberich D, List J (2012) Digging into background risk: Experiments with farmers and students. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 94:457–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt C, Laury S (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92:1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom R, Romer D, Williams S (1981) Risk aversion with random initial wealth. Econometrica 49:911–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball MS (1993) Standard risk aversion. Econometrica 61:589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J (2008) The effect of the background risk in a simple chance improving decision model. J. Risk Uncertainty 36:19–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusk JL, Coble KH (2008) Risk aversion in the presence of background risk: Evidence from the lab. Cox JC, Harrison GW, eds. Risk Aversion in Experiments, Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 12 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 317–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinez LR, Jaramillo N, de Roux N, Cardenas J-C (2010) It's not my money: An experiment on risk aversion and the house-money effect. Documentos CEDE 2010-02, Centro de Estudios sobre Desarrollo Económico, Universidade de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia.Google Scholar
• Mehra R, Prescott E (1985) The equity premium: A puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. 10:335–59.Google Scholar
• Meyer DJ, Meyer J (1998) Changes in background risk and the demand for insurance. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory 23:29–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nachman P (1982) Preservation of “more risk averse” under expectations. J. Econom. Theory 28:361–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32:122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J (1988) Aversion to one risk in the presence of others. J. Risk Uncertainty 1:395–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J, Zeckhauser R (1987) Proper risk aversion. Econometrica 55:143–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 3:497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3:323–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J (2003) Background risk in generalized expected utility theory. Econom. Theory 22:607–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J, Chambers R (1998) A state-contingent production approach to principal-agent problems with an application to point-source pollution control. J. Public Econom. 70:441–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safra Z, Segal U (1998) Constant risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 83:19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safra Z, Segal U (2008) Calibration results for non-expected utility theories. Econometrica 76:1143–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt U, Starmer C, Sugden R (2008) Third-generation prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36:203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ (1990) Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. 36:643–660.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Weber M, Zuchel H (2005) How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house money effect. Decision Anal. 2:30–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Weil P (1992) Equilibrium asset prices with undiversifiable labor income risk. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 16:769–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaari M (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55:95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar