The Impact of Advice on Women's and Men's Selection into Competition

References

• Athey S, Avery C, Zemsky P (2000) Mentoring and diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):765–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2012) Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the laboratory. Science 335(6068):579–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M (2012) Distributional preferences and competitive behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):125–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettinger E, Baker R (2011) The effects of student coaching in college: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student mentoring. Working Paper 16881, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Currie JM, Croson RTA, Ginther DK (2010) Can mentoring help female assistant professors? Interim results from a randomized trial. Amer. Econom. Assoc. 100(2):348–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S, Dalal RS (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth A, Nolen P (2012) Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81(2):542–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper D (2007) It's what you say, not what you pay: An experimental study of manager-employee relationships in overcoming coordination failure. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1223–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Charness G, Ellman M (2012) Let's talk: How communication affects contract design. CESifo Working Paper 3883, Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain.Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Masters WA, Sheremeta RM (2010) Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study. J. Public Econom. 94(9–10):604–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celen B, Kariv S, Schotter A (2010) An experimental test of advice and social learning. Management Sci. 56(10):1687–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rustichini A, van de Ven J (2011) Self-confidence and strategic deterrence. Discussion Paper 11-151/1, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A, Schotter A, Sopher B (2009) Talking ourselves to efficiency: Coordination in inter-generational minimum effort games with private, almost common and common knowledge of advice. Econom. J. 119(534):91–122.Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dargnies MP (2012) Men too sometimes shy away from competition: The case of team competition. Management Sci. 58(11):1982–2000.Link, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multi-dimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertac S, Szentes B (2011) The effect of information on gender differences in competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Working Paper 1104, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
• Ewers M (2012) Information and competition entry. Discussion Paper 6411, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2010) Do competitive work places deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on gender differences in job-entry decisions. Working Paper 16546, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gino F (2008) Do we listen to advice just because we paid for it? The impact of advice cost on its use. Organ. Behav. Human Decision 107(2):234–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0—A guide for the organization of experiments in economics. Working Paper Series in Economics 10, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Grosse ND, Riener G (2010) Explaining gender differences in competitiveness: Gender-task stereotypes. Jena Economic Research Paper 2010-017, University of Jena, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
• Gupta ND, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Economic Inquiry 51(1):816–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iriberri N, Rey-Biel P (2013) On women's underperformance in competitive environments: When and why. Working paper, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain.Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Schotter A (2008) Learning under supervision: An experimental study. Experiment. Econom. 11(2):154–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möbius MM, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblatt TS (2013) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Working paper, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How sterotypes impair women's career in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Rey-Biel P, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2012) The emergence of male leadership in competitive environments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):111–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodrìguez-Planas N (2010) Mentoring, educational services, and economic incentives: Longer-term evidence on risky behaviors from a randomized trial. Discussion Paper 4968, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Schotter A (2003) Decision making with naive advice. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):196–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Sopher B (2003) Social learning and coordination conventions in inter-generational games: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. 111(3):498–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Sopher B (2007) Advice and behavior in intergenerational ultimatum games: An experimental approach. Games Econom. Behav. 58(2):365–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shurchkov O (2012) Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 10(5):1189–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Amer. Psychologist 52(6):613–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Glätzle-Rützler D (2014) Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1981.Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32(1):161–198.Crossref, Google Scholar