An Experimental Investigation of Auctions and Bargaining in Procurement
Published Online:12 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1880
References
- (1996) Auctions versus negotiations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(1):180–194.Google Scholar
- (1989) The simple economics of optimal auctions. J. Political Econom. 97(5):1060–1090.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: A meta-study. Experiment. Econom. 14(4):519–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Incentives and behavior in English, Dutch and sealed-bid auctions. Econom. Inquiry 18(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Theory and behavior in single object auctions. Smith VL, ed. Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 2 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–43.Google Scholar
- (1988) Theory and individual behavior of first-price auctions. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):61–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. J. Econom. Literature 51(1):5–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 30(2):197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) Order Statistics, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2011) Do auctioneers pick optimal reserve prices? Management Sci. 57(1):177–192.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Auctions within e-sourcing events. Production Oper. Management 16(4):409–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Regret in auctions: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory 33(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A direct test of risk aversion and regret in first price sealed-bid auctions. Decision Anal. 6(2):75–86.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1407–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Quantal response equilibrium and overbidding in private-value auctions. J. Econom. Theory 104(1):247–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Risk averse behavior in generalized matching pennies games. Games Econom. Behav. 45(1):97–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Kremer K, Macho V, eds., Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Vol. 63 (GWDG Bericht, Göttingen, Germany), 79–93.Google Scholar
- (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):367–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Ultimatum games with incomplete information on the side of the proposer: An experimental study. Cuadernos de Economa 27(75):37–74.Google Scholar
- (2009) Equity and cash in intercorporate asset sales: Theory and evidence. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):681–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Responder behavior in ultimatum offer games with incomplete information. J. Econom. Psych. 20(2):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Auction Theory, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, Burlington, MA).Google Scholar
- (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Second chance offers versus sequential auctions: Theory and behavior. Econom. Theory 34(1):47–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Procuring commodities: First-price sealed-bid or English auctions? Marketing Sci. 31(2):317–333.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Multiple sourcing and procurement process selection with bidding events. Management Sci. 55(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. 57(4):934–949.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) When does it pay to delay supplier qualification? Theory and experiments. Management Sci. 58(11):2057–2075.Link, Google Scholar

