Are Good-Looking People More Employable?

References

• Agthe M, Spörrle M, Maner JK (2010) Don't hate me because I'm beautiful: Anti-attractiveness bias in organizational evaluation and decision making. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 46(6):1151–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agthe M, Spörrle M, Maner JK (2011) Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attractiveness on social decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 20(10):1–13.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2008) Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. J. Econom. Psych. 29(1):73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Issacharoff S, Camerer C (1995) Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1337–1343.Google Scholar
• Bagues MF, Esteve-Volart B (2010) Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1301–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Ben Hador B, Even A, Apelboum E, Drieher H, Sharon D, Cohen Y, Mundlak G (2005) Employment discrimination in Israel: Some evidence from correspondence tests. [In Hebrew.] Labor, Soc. Law 11:381–407.Google Scholar
• Berggren N, Jordahl H, Poutvaara P (2010) The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. J. Public Econom. 94(1–2):8–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biddle JE, Hamermesh DS (1998) Beauty, productivity, and discrimination: Lawyers' looks and lucre. J. Labor Econom. 16(1):172–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brick S (2012) “There are downsides to looking this pretty”: Why women hate me for being beautiful. Daily Mail (April 2), http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2124246/Samantha-Brick-downsides-looking-pretty-Why-women-hate-beautiful.html.Google Scholar
• Broder IE (1993) Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(4):964–970.Google Scholar
• Buss DM, Haselton M (2005) The evolution of jealousy. Trends Cognitive Sci. 9(11):506–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dermer M, Thiel DL (1975) When beauty may fall. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(6):1168–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 24(3):285–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donath J (2010) Anonymous job applications: German pilot project aims to reduce discrimination. Spiegel Online Internat. (August 25), http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,713711,00.html.Google Scholar
• Eaves D, Png IPL, Ramseyer JM (1989) Gender, ethnicity, and grades: Empirical evidence of discrimination in law-firm interviews. Law Inequality J. 7(2):189–214.Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Petrie R (2011) Face value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1497–1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feingold A (1992) Good-looking people are not what we think. Psych. Bull. 111(2):304–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):351–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Firth M (1982) Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women. Sex Roles 8(8):891–901.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregorian D (2010) Woman says she was fired from Citibank for being too hot. New York Post (June 3), http://nypost.com/2010/06/03/woman-says-she-was-fired-from-citibank-for-being-too-hot-2/.Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS (2011) Beauty Pays: Why Attractive People Are More Successful (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE (1994) Beauty and the labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1174–1194.Google Scholar
• Hatfield E, Sprecher S (1986) Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life (SUNY, New York),.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Saruwatari LR (1979) When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and non-managerial jobs. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 23(3):360–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jowell R, Prescott-Clarke P (1970) Racial discrimination and white-collar workers in Britain. Race Class 11(4):397–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Balch B (2010) Le CV anonyme prend ses marques. L'Express (February 18), http://www.lexpress.fr/emploi-carriere/le-cv-anonyme-prend-ses-marques_849911.html.Google Scholar
• López Bóo F, Rosi MA, Urzúa SS (2013) The labor market return to an attractive face: Evidence from a field experiment. Econom. Lett. 118(1):170–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luxen MF, van de Vijver FJR (2006) Facial attractiveness, sexual selection, and personnel selection: When evolved preferences matter. J. Organ. Behav. 27(2):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobius MM, Rosenblat TS (2006) Why beauty matters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):222–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrett M (2013) Beauty and the feast: Examining the effect of beauty on earnings using data from a natural field experiment. Working paper, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
• Parrott WG, Smith RH (1993) Distinguishing the experiences of envy and jealousy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(6):906–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (1987) Testing for sexual discrimination in the labour market. Australian Econom. Papers 26(49):165–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (1991) Testing for racial discrimination in the labour market. Cambridge J. Econom. 15(3):239–256.Google Scholar
• Riach PA, Rich J (2002) Field experiments of discrimination. Econom. J. 112(November):F480–F518.Google Scholar
• Rooth DO (2009) Obesity, attractiveness, and differential treatment in hiring. J. Human Resources 44(3):710–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein Y, Brenner D (2014) Pride and prejudice: Using ethnic-sounding names and inter-ethnic marriages to identify labour market discrimination. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(1):389–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sagarin B, Becker DV, Guadagno RE, Nicastle LD, Millevoi A (2003) Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity. Evolution Human Behav. 24(1):17–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solnick SJ, Schweitzer ME (1999) The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 79(3):199–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer D (2003) Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring. Labour Econom. 10(6):629–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson RK, Eckel CC (2006) Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Res. Quart. 59(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar