Latent Homophily or Social Influence? An Empirical Analysis of Purchase Within a Social Network

References

• Anagnostopoulos A, Kumar R, Mahdian M (2008) Influence and correlation in social networks. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 7–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari A, Koenigsberg O, Stahl F (2011) Modeling multiple relationships in social networks. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):713–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence based contagion from homophily driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2012) Are paid subscriptions on music social networks contagious? A randomized field experiment. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(1):215–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Song S (2007) Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(4):361–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bott H (1928) Observation of play activities in a nursery school. Genetic Psych. Monographs 4(1):44–88.Google Scholar
• Braun M, Bonfrer A (2011) Scalable inference of customer similarities from interactions data using dirichlet processes. Marketing Sci. 30(3):513–531.Link, Google Scholar
• Chib S (1995) Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(432):1313–1321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK (1993) Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. 12(2):184–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi J, Hui SK, Bell DR (2010) Spatiotemporal analysis of imitation behavior across new buyers at an online grocery retailer. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England J. Medicine 357(4):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Wedel M, Böckenholt U, Steerneman T (2005) Solving and testing for regressor-error (in)dependence when no instrumental variables are available: With new evidence for the effect of education on income. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(4):365–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Y, Das S, Dellarocas C, Pfeiffer B, Libai B, Sen S, Shi M, Verlegh P (2005) The firm's management of social interactions. Marketing Lett. 16(3–4):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gönül F, Srinivasan K (1993) Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit models, methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Sci. 12(3):213–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–208.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S (1991) Stochastic models of interpurchase time with time-dependent covariates. J. Marketing Res. 28(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR (2010) Demand estimation with social interactions and the implications for targeted marketing. Marketing Sci. 29(4):585–601.Link, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair H, Manchanda P, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C (2008) Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):287–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill S, Provost F, Volinsky C (2006) Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. 21(2):256–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2003) A survey of models of network formation: Stability and efficiency. Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Jackson MO, Watts A (2002) The evolution of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory 106(2):265–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd S, Kearns M, Vorobeychik Y (2010) Behavioral dynamics and influence in networked coloring and consensus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(34):14978–14982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Fond T, Neville J (2010) Randomization tests for distinguishing social influence and homophily effects. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 601–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leenders RTAJ (2002) Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Soc. Networks 24(1):21–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyons R (2011) The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis. Statistics, Politics, Policy 2(1):Article 2, http://www.bepress.com/spp/vol2/iss1/2.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson JM, Smith-Lovin L (1987) Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 52(3):370–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociology 27:415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Manchanda P, Bhatia T (2010) Asymmetric peer effects in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):883–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton MA, Raftery AE (1994) Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 56(1):3–48.Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE, Sonnier GP (2012) A latent instrumental variables approach to modeling keyword conversion in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 49(3):306–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalizi CR, Thomas AC (2011) Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2):211–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bunt GGV, Steglich C (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc. Networks 32(1):44–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steeg GV, Galstyan A (2010) Ruling out latent homophily in social networks. NIPS Workshop on Social Computing. http://mlg.cs.purdue.edu/lib/exe/fetch.php?id=schedule&cache=cache&media=machine_learning_group:projects:paper19.pdf.Google Scholar
• Steglich C, Snijders TAB, Pearson M (2010) Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociol. Methodology 40(1):329–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien G (2001) Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociology 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Stremersch S (2004) Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. 23(4):530–544.Link, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wedel M, Pieters R (2009) Sales effects of attention to feature advertisements: A Bayesian mediation analysis. J. Marketing Res. 46(5):669–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Wilkinson D, Provost F (2008) Social network collaborative filtering. Working Paper CeDER-8-08, Center for Digital Economy Research, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York. https://archive.nyu.edu/handle/2451/27735.Google Scholar