Conscience Accounting: Emotion Dynamics and Social Behavior

References

• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amodio DM, Devine PG, Harmon-Jones E (2007) A dynamic model of guilt: Implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psych. Sci. 18(6):524–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Rao JM, Trachtman H (2011) Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. NBER Working Paper 17648, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2007) Guilt in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):170–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P, Dufwenberg M (2009) Dynamic psychological games. J. Econom. Theory 144(1):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Stillwell AM, Heatherton TF (1994) Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psych. Bull. 115(2):243–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1976) A theory of social interactions. J. Political Econom. 82(6):1063–1093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blume A, Gneezy U (2010) Cognitive forward induction and coordination without common knowledge: An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Hole AD, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):818–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Konow J, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2014) Just luck: An experimental study of risk-taking and fairness. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(4):1398–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):103–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Dufwenberg M (2006) Promises and partnership. Econometrica 74(6):1579–1601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Hooge IE (2012) The exemplary social emotion guilt: Not so relationship-oriented when another person repairs for you. Cognition Emotion 26(7):1189–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Hooge IE, Zeelenberg M, Breugelmans SM (2007) Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt. Cognition Emotion 21(5):1025–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Della Vigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, Johannesson M (2008) Gender differences in deception. Econom. Lett. 99(1):197–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Gneezy U (2000) Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games Econom. Behav. 30(2):163–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elster J (1998) Emotions and economic theory. J. Econom. Literature 36(1):47–74.Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Follmi-Heusi F (2013) Lies in disguise—An experiment on cheating. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Imas A, Brown A, Nelson LD, Norton MI (2012) Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Sci. 58(1):179–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U (2005) Deception: The role of consequences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(1):384–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A (2014) Materazzi effect and the strategic use of anger in competitive interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(4):1334–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A, Madarász K (2014) Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior—supplementary materials, https://sites.google.com/site/alexoimas/ca.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J. Bus. 59(4, Part 2):S285–S300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Lerner J (2010) Emotion. Gilbert DT, Fiske S, Lindsay G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology (McGraw-Hill, New York), 312–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan U, Dhar R (2006) Licensing effect in consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. 43(2):259–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kircher P, Ludwig S, Sandroni A (2010) Procedural fairness: A note on the difference between social and private goods. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1987) Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Econom. J. 97(387):666–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control?: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(3):272–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people?: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):633–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meier S (2007) Do subsidies increase charitable giving in the long run? Matching donations in a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 5(6):1203–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monin B, Miller DT (2001) Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(1):33–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sachdeva S, Iliev R, Medin DL (2009) Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psych. Sci. 20(4):523–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G (2003) Helping a victim or helping the victim?: Altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertainty 26(1):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M (2009) Deception through telling the truth?! Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. Econom. J. 119(534):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Boven L, White K, Huber M (2009) Immediacy bias in emotion perception: Current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 138(3):368–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vesterlund L (2003) The informational value of sequential fundraising. J. Public Econom. 87(34):627–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhong CB, Ku G, Lount RB, Murnighan JK (2009) Compensatory ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 92(3):323–339.Crossref, Google Scholar