Bonus Payments and Reference Point Violations

References

• Akerlof G, Yellen J (1990) The fair wage-effort hypothesis and unemployment. Quart. J. Econom. 105(2):255–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Ockenfels A, Roth AE (2005) An experimental analysis of ending rules in internet auctions. RAND J. Econom. 36(4):890–907.Google Scholar
• Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, James JC, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1913–1928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bewley TF (1999) Why Wages Don’t Fall During a Recession (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE (1991) A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(5):1096–1136.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2010) Betrayal aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):628–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Brandts J, Ockenfels A (2005) Fair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteries. Econom. J. 115(506):1054–1076.Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Saijo T, Schram A (2004) How universal is behavior? A four country comparison of spite, cooperation and errors in voluntary contribution mechanisms. Public Choice 119(3–4):381–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2981–3003.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen YF, Harper M, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark AE (1999) Are wages habit-forming? Evidence from micro data. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 39(2):179–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark AE, Oswald AJ (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. J. Public Econom. 61(3):359–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark AE, Frijters P, Shields MA (2008) Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. J. Econom. Literature 46(1):95–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark AE, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2010) Effort and comparison income: Experimental and survey evidence. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 63(3):407–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Herrmann B, Schneider F (2014) Social comparison and effort provision. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):877–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colella A, Paetzold R, Zardkoohi A, Wesson M (2007) Exposing pay secrecy. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper DJ, Kagel JH (2014) Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Demougin D, Fluet C (2003) Inequity aversion in tournaments. CIRPEE Working Paper 03-22, Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi, Montreal.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G (2004) A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 47(2):268–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 54(2):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Götte L, Zehnder C (2009) A behavioral account of the labor market: The role of fairness concerns. Annual Rev. Econom. 1:355–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart. J. Econom. 108(2):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Carbonell I (2005) Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J. Public Econom. 89(5–6):997–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank RH (1984) Are workers paid their marginal products? Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(4):549–571.Google Scholar
• Frank RH (1985) The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(1):101–116.Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Sunstein CR (2001) Cost-benefit analysis and relative position. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 68(2):323–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econom. Literature 40(2):402–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Stutzer A (2005) Beyond outcomes: Measuring procedural utility. Oxford Econom. Papers 57(1):90–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman RB (1978) Job satisfaction as an economic variable. Amer. Econom. Rev. 68(2):135–141.Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Fehr E (2002) Fairness in the labour market: A survey of experimental results. Bolle F, Lehmann-Waffenschmidt M, eds. Surveys in Experimental Economics: Bargaining, Cooperation and Election Stock Markets (Physica, Heidelberg, Germany), 95–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Thöni C (2010) Social comparison and performance: Experimental evidence on the fair wage-effort hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(3):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartenberg C, Wulf J (2013) Pay harmony: Peer comparison and executive compensation. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments. Kremer K, Macho V, eds. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, GWDG Bericht 63 (Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, Germany), 79–93.Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Ockenfels A, Werner P (2011) Wage transparency and performance: A real-effort experiment. Econom. Lett. 111(3):236–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grund C, Sliwka D (2005) Envy and compassion in tournaments. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(1):187–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh D (1977) Economic aspects of job satisfacton. Ashenfelter OC, Wallace EO, eds. Essays in Labor Market and Population Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 53–72.Google Scholar
• Hamermesh D (2001) The changing distribution of job satisfaction. J. Human Resources 36(1):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Roth AE (2000) The dynamics of reorganization in matching markets: A laboratory experiment motivated by a natural experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 105(1):201–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon I, Meyersson Milgrom E (2009) Status in the workplace: Evidence from M&A. Working paper, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89(5):841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine DI (1993) What do wages buy? Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3): 462–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu C, Borg I, Spector PE (2004) Measurement equivalence of the German job satisfaction survey used in a multinational organization: Implications of Schwartz’s culture model. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1070–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2):271–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luttmer E (2005) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):963–1002.Google Scholar
• Mas A (2006) Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):783–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Damisch L (2008) Going back to Donald—How comparisons shape judgmental priming effects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(6):1295–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagin DS, Rebitzer JB, Sanders S, Taylor LJ (2002) Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):850–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neckermann S, Cueni R, Frey BS (2014) Awards at work. Labor Econom. 31:205–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek H, Sloof R, Van De Kuilen G (2004) Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experiment. Econom. 7(2):171–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Langton N (1993) The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):382–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (2002) Uncertainty and incentives. J. Labor Econom. 20(2):115–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C, Topel RH (1996) Favoritism in organizations. J. Political Econom. 104(5):958–978.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Rebitzer JB, Taylor LJ (2011) Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motives: Standard and behavioral approaches to agency and labor markets. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 4A (Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam), 701–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck J, May DR, Brown FW (1994) Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 79(3):455–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Towers Perrin (2007) Reward management: Closing a growing say/do gap. Reward challenges and changes survey report. Towers Perrin, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
• Werner S, Ones DS (2000) Determinants of perceived pay inequities: The effects of comparison other characteristics and pay-system communication. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 30(6):1281–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar