Path to Purchase: A Mutually Exciting Point Process Model for Online Advertising and Conversion

References

• Abhishek V, Fader PS, Hosanagar K (2013) Media exposure through the funnel: A model of multi-stage attribution. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Ait-Sahalia Y, Cacho-Diaz J, Laeven RJA (2013) Modeling financial contagion using mutually exciting jump processes. Working paper, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
• Anand P, Sternthal B (1991) Perceptual fluency and affect without recognition. Memory Cognition 19(3):293–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson JR, Milson R (1989) Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psych. Rev. 96(4):703–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijwaard GE, Franses PH, Paap R (2006) Modeling purchases as repeated events. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 24(4):487–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowsher CG (2007) Modeling security market events in continuous time: Intensity based, multivariate point process models. J. Econometrics 141(2):876–912.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J (1958) Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 10(1):12–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin RE, Sismeiro C (2003) A model of Web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. 40(3):249–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Isham V (1980) Point Processes (Chapman and Hall, New York).Google Scholar
• Daley DJ, Vere-Jones D (2003) An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Smith MS (2011) Modeling multivariate distributions using copulas: Applications in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• De P, Hu Y(J), Rahman MS (2010) Technology usage and online sales: An empirical study. Management Sci. 56(11):1930–1945.Link, Google Scholar
• Dong X, Chintagunta PK, Manchanda P (2011) A new multivariate count data model to study multi-category physician prescription behavior. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(3):301–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreze X, Zufryden F (1998) Is internet advertising ready for prime time? J. Advertising Res. 38(3):7–18.Google Scholar
• Engel JF, Blackwell RD, Miniard PW (1995) Consumer Behavior (The Dryden Press, Oak Brook, IL).Google Scholar
• Gelfand AE, Dey DK (1994) Bayesian model choice: Asymptotics and exact calculations. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 56(3):501–514.Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (1971a) Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes. J. Royal Statist. Soc.: Ser. B 33(3):438–443.Google Scholar
• Hawkes AG (1971b) Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58(1):83–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau, PricewaterhouseCoopers (2012) IAB Internet advertising revenue report 2011 full-year results. Market research report, Interactive Advertising Bureau and PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York.Google Scholar
• Jacoby LL, Dallas M (1981) On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 110(3):306–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C (1990) The influence of nonattended material on the processing of advertising claims. J. Marketing Res. 27(3):263–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY (2002) Effects of implicit memory on memory-based versus stimulus-based brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):440–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AY, Labroo AA (2004) The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 41(2):151–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leone RP (1995) Generalizing what is known about temporal aggregation and advertising carryover. Marketing Sci. 14(3):141–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Li H(A), Kannan PK (2014) Attributing conversions in a multichannel online marketing environment: An empirical model and a field experiment. J. Marketing Res. 51(1):40–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Dube J-P, Goh KY, Chintagunta PK (2006) The effect of banner advertising on internet purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):98–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MarketingSherpa (2012) 2012 search marketing benchmark report—PPC edition. Market research report, MarketingSherpa, Jacksonville, FL.Google Scholar
• MediaMind (2010) MediaMind global benchmark report: Standard banners—Non-standard results. Market research report, MediaMind, New York.Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Fader PS (2004) Dynamic conversion behavior at e-commerce sites. Management Sci. 50(3):326–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Mohler GO, Short MB, Brantingham PJ, Schoenberg FP, Tita GE (2011) Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):100–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery AL, Li S, Srinivasan K, Liechty JC (2004) Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. 23(4):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Muter P (1980) Very rapid forgetting. Memory Cognition 8(2):174–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nedungadi P (1990) Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 17(3):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1978) The asymptotic behavior of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 30(2):243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1981) On Lewis' simulation method for point processes. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 27(1):23–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogata Y (1998) Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 50(2):379–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park Y-H, Fader PS (2004) Modeling browsing behavior at multiple websites. Marketing Sci. 23(3):280–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothschild ML, Hyun YJ (1990) Predicting memory for components of TV commercials from EEG. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):472–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro S (1999) When an ad's influence is beyond our conscious control: Perceptual and conceptual fluency effects caused by incidental ad exposure. J. Consumer Res. 26(1):16–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro S, Macinnis DJ, Heckler SE (1997) The effects of incidental ad exposure on the formation of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 24(1):94–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Specific Media (2011) Consumer privacy: Choice, clarity, control. Market research report, Specific Media, London.Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Franses PH (2006) Optimal data interval for estimating advertising response. Marketing Sci. 25(3):217–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Zantedeschi D, Feit EM, Bradlow ET (2013) Measuring multi-channel advertising effectiveness using consumer-level advertising response data. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Bradlow ET, Small DS (2013) New measures of clumpiness for incidence data. J. Appl. Statist. 40(11):2533–2548.Crossref, Google Scholar