Improving Penetration Forecasts Using Social Interactions Data

References

• Ansari A, Koenigsberg O, Stahl F (2011) Modeling multiple relationships in online social networks. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):713–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass FM, Krishnan TV, Jain DC (1994) Why the Bass model fits without decision variables. Marketing Sci. 13(3):203–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass FM, Gordon K, Ferguson TL, Githens ML (2001) DIRECTV: Forecasting diffusion of a new technology prior to product launch. Interfaces 31(3):S82–S93.Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H (1966) Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis, IN).Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Zhang X, Awad NF (2007) Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dover Y, Goldenberg J, Shapira D (2012) Network traces on penetration: Uncovering degree distribution from adoption data. Marketing Sci. 31(4):689–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Du RY, Kamakura WA (2011) Measuring contagion in the diffusion of consumer packaged goods. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):28–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta P (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch GJ, Jindal P (2011) Estimating durable goods adoption decisions from stated preference data. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45(4):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easingwood CJ, Mahajan V, Muller E (1983) A nonuniform influence innovation diffusion model of new product acceptance. Marketing Sci. 2(3):273–295.Link, Google Scholar
• East R, Hammond K, Lomax W (2006) Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 25(3):215–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garber T, Jacob G, Libai B, Eitan M (2004) From density to destiny: Using spatial analysis for early prediction of new product success. Marketing Sci. 23(3):419–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E (2002) Riding the saddle, how cross-market communications creates a major slump in sales. J. Marketing 66(2):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldenberg J, Lowengart O, Shapira D (2009) Zooming in: Self-emergence of movements in new product growth. Marketing Sci. 28(2):274–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR (2009) A dynamic model of consumer replacement in the PC processor industry. Marketing Sci. 28(5):846–867.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahn M, Park S, Krishnamurthi L, Zoltners AA (1994) Analysis of new product diffusion using a four-segment trial-repeat model. Marketing Sci. 13(3):224–247.Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser J, Tellis GJ, Griffin A (2006) Research on innovation: A review and agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Sci. 25(6):687–717.Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D, Simon LS (1983) Advertising and the diffusion of new products. Marketing Sci. 2(1):1–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalish S, Sen SK (1986) Diffusion models and the marketing mix for single products. Mahajan V, Wind Y, eds. Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 87–115.Google Scholar
• Katz E, Lazarsfeld P (1955) Personal Influence (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Keller E, Fay B (2012) The Face-to-Face Book: Why Real Relationships Rule in a Digital Marketplace (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lehmann DR, Esteban-Bravo M (2006). When giving some away makes sense to jump start the diffusion process. Marketing Lett. 17(4):243–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenk PJ, Rao AG (1990) New models from old: Forecasting product adoption by hierarchical Bayes procedures. J. Marketing Res. 9(1):42–53.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Adamic LA, Huberman BA (2007) The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans. on the Web (TWEB) 1(1):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing 70(3):74–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Peterson RA (1985) Models of Innovation (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Muller E, Kerin R (1984) Introduction strategy for new products with positive and negative word-of-mouth. Management Sci. 30(12):1389–1404.Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM (1990) New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing 54(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1961) Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29(4):741–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller E, Yogev G (2006) When does the majority become a majority? Empirical analysis of the time at which main market adopters purchase the bulk of our sales. Technological Forecasting Soc. Change 73(9):1107–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair HS (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair HS, Manchanda P, Bhatia T (2010) Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):883–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2010) The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mouth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. 29(4):690–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts JR, Nelson CJ, Morrison PD (2005) A prelaunch diffusion model for evaluating market defense strategies. Marketing Sci. 24(1):150–164.Link, Google Scholar
• Robinson B, Lakhani C (1975) Dynamic price models for new product planning. Management Sci. 21(10):1113–1122.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM (2003) Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. 22(3):304–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmittlein DC, Mahajan V (1982) Maximum likelihood estimation for an innovation diffusion model of new product acceptance. Marketing Sci. 1(1):57–78.Link, Google Scholar
• Shaikh NI, Rangaswamy A, Balakrishnan A (2007) Modeling the diffusion of innovations through small-world networks. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
• Shriver SK (2015) Network effects in alternative fuel adoption: Empirical analysis of the market for ethanol. Marketing Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Sinha RK, Chandrashekaran M (1992) A split hazard model for analyzing the diffusion of innovations. J. Marketing Res. 29(1):116–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I, Chintagunta PK (2003) A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogenous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(4):371–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sood A, James GM, Tellis GJ (2009) Functional regression: A new model for predicting market penetration of new products. Marketing Sci. 28(1):36–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan V, Mason CH (1986) Nonlinear least squares estimation of new product diffusion models. Marketing Sci. 5(2):169–178.Link, Google Scholar
• Strang D (1991) Adding social structure to diffusion models: An event study framework. Sociol. Methods Res. 19(3):324–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sultan F, Farley JU, Lehmann DR (1990) A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. 27(1):70–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talukdar D, Sudhir K, Ainslie A (2002) Investigating new product diffusion across products and countries. Marketing Sci. 21(1):97–114.Link, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bodapati AV, Bucklin RE (2010) Determining influential users in Internet social networks. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):643–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Rand W, Joshi YV (2013) Improving prelaunch diffusion forecasts: Using synthetic networks as simulated priors. J. Marketing Res. 50(6):675–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (1997) Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macro-level diffusion models. Marketing Sci. 16(4):338–353.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisit ed. Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Lans R, van Bruggen G, Eliashberg J, Wierenga B (2010) A viral branching model for predicting the spread of electronic word of mouth. Marketing Sci. 29(2):348–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of “small world” networks. Nature 393(4):440–442.Crossref, Google Scholar