Do Relationships Matter? Evidence from Loan Officer Turnover

References

• Agarwal S, Hauswald R (2010) Distance and private information in lending. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(7):2757–2788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Cole S, Duflo E (2009) Default and punishment: Incentives and lending behavior in Indian banks. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Berg T, Puri M, Rocholl J (2013) Loan officer incentives and the limits of hard information. NBER Working Paper 19051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Udell GF (2002) Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organisational structure. Econom. J. 112(477):F32–F53.Google Scholar
• Berger AN, Miller NH, Petersen MA, Rajan RG, Stein JC (2005) Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. J. Financial Econom. 76(2):237–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buie V, Owings M, DeFrances C, Golosinskiy A (2010) National hospital discharge survey: 2006 annual summary. Vital and Health Statistics Series 13, Report 168, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Fisman RJ, Paravisini D, Vig V (2012) Cultural proximity and loan outcomes. NBER Working Paper 18096, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadalupe M, Li H, Wulf J (2014) Who lives in the C-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Sci. 60(4):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen M (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P, Beckman C (1998) When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):815–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertzberg A, Liberti JM, Paravisini D (2010) Information and incentives inside the firm: Evidence from loan officer rotation. J. Finance 65(3):795–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.Link, Google Scholar
• Mian A (2006) Distance constraints: The limits of foreign lending in poor economies. J. Finance 61(3):1465–1505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paravisini D, Schoar A (2012) The technological and agency effects of IT: Randomized evidence from credit committees. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Petersen M, Rajan R (1995) The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Quart. J. Econom. 110(2):407–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Vol. 4 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Qian J, Strahan PE, Yang Z (2014) The impact of incentives and communication costs on information production and use: Evidence from bank lending. J. Finance. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Rajan RG (1992) Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arm's-length debt. J. Finance 47(4):1367–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajan RG, Wulf J (2006) The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):759–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stein J (2002) Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized versus hierarchical firms. J. Finance 57(5):1891–1921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):674–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1999) Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(4):481–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Lancaster R (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. 49(4):383–399.Link, Google Scholar