Does a Procurement Service Provider Generate Value for the Buyer Through Information About Supply Risks?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1963

References

  • Adida E, Bakshi N, DeMiguel V (2012) Supply chain intermediation when retailers lead. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
  • Aydin G, Babich V, Beil DR, Yang Z (2012) Decentralized supply risk management. Kouvelis P, Boyabatli O, Dong L, Li R, eds. Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains, Chap. 14 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 389–424.Google Scholar
  • Babich V (2010) Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):583–607.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron DP, Besanko D (1999) Informational alliances. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66(4):743–768.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belavina E, Girotra K (2012) The relational advantages of intermediation. Management Sci. 58(9):1614–1631.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Biglaiser G (1993) Middlemen as experts. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):212–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaturvedi A, Martínez-de Albéniz V (2011) Optimal procurement design in the presence of supply risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 13(2):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ciarallo FW, Akella R, Morton TE (1994) A periodic review, production planning model with uncertain capacity and uncertain demand—Optimality of extended myopic policies. Management Sci. 40(3):320–332.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faure-Grimaud A, Martimort D (2001) On some agency costs of intermediated contracting. Econom. Lett. 71(1):75–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federgruen A, Yang N (2009) Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Oper. Res. 57(6):1451–1468.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R (1992) Game Theory for Applied Economists (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Gilbert RJ, Riordan MH (1995) Regulating complementary products: A comparative institutional analysis. RAND J. Econom. 26(2):243–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gümüş M, Ray S, Gurnani H (2012) Supply side story: Risks, guarantees, competition and information asymmetry. Management Sci. 58(9):1694–1714.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont JJ, Martimort D (2002) The Theory of Incentives (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee RP, McMillan J (1995) Organizational diseconomies of scale. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(3):399–426.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mookherjee D, Tsumagari M (2004) The organization of supplier networks: Effects of delegation and intermediation. Econometrica 72(4):1179–1219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1):58–73.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Popp A (2000) “Swamped in information but starved of data”: Information and intermediaries in clothing supply chains. Supply Chain Management 5(3):151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel MJ, Babich V (2012) Optimality of myopic policies for dynamic lot-sizing problems in serial production lines with random yields and autoregressive demand. Oper. Res. 60(6):1520–1536.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song JS, Zipkin PH (1996) Inventory control with information about supply conditions. Management Sci. 42(10):1409–1419.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin B, Wang Y (2011) Operational strategies for managing supply chain disruption risk. Kouvelis P, Boyabatli O, Dong L, Li R, eds. Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains, Chap. 4 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 79–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vedel M, Ellegaard C (2013) Supply risk management functions of sourcing intermediaries—An investigation of the clothing industry. Supply Chain Management 18(5):509–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu SD (2004) Supply chain intermediation: A barganing theoretic framework. Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZM, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era, Chap. 3 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 67–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Z, Aydin G, Babich V, Beil D (2012) Using a dual-sourcing option in the presence of asymmetric information about supplier reliability: Competition vs. diversification. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):202–217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Z, Aydın G, Babich V, Beil DR (2009) Supply disruptions, asymmetric information, and a backup production option. Management Sci. 55(2):192–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.