Seeing Stars: Matthew Effects and Status Bias in Major League Baseball Umpiring

References

• Adut A (2005) A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wilde. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):213–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen MP, Parsons NL (2006) The institutionalization of fame: Achievement, recognition, and cultural consecration in baseball. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(5):808–825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D, Kring AM (2001) Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81:116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Willer R, Kilduff G, Brown C (2012) The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(5):1077–1088.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Benjamin BA, Podolny JM (1999) Status, quality, and social order in the California wine industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(3):563–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Rosenholtz SJ, Zelditch M (1980) Status organizing processes. Annual Rev. Sociol. 6:479–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fisek MH, Norman R, Wagner D (1985) The formation of reward expectations in status situations. Berger J, Zelditch M, eds. Status, Rewards and Influence (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 215–261.Google Scholar
• Berger J, Fisek MH, Norman RZ, Zelditch M Jr (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim Y, Smith EB (2011) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 57(3):439–457.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Haynes R, Lee W, Smith EB (2010) When do Matthew effects occur? J. Math. Sociol. 34(2):80–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? Amer. J. Sociol. 112(5):1297–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL, Zuckerman EW, Bloch S, Jank S (2012) It's the conventional thought that counts: The origins of status advantage in third order inference. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Deaux K, Major B (1987) Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psych. Rev. 94(3):369–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fast M (2011a) Spinning yarn—The real strike zone. Baseball Prospectus (February 16), http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=12965.Google Scholar
• Fast M (2011b) Spinning yarn—The real strike zone, part 2. Baseball Prospectus (June 1), http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=14098.Google Scholar
• Fast M (2011c) Spinning yarn—Removing the mask encore presentation. Baseball Prospectus (September 24), http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=15093.Google Scholar
• Fine GA (2001) Difficult Reputations: Collective Memories of the Evil, Inept, and Controversial (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford GG, Goodwin F, Richardson JW (1996) Perceptual factors affecting the accuracy of ball and strike judgments from the traditional American League and National League umpiring perspectives. Internat. J. Sport Psych. 27:(1)50–58.Google Scholar
• Frank RH, Cook PJ (1995) The Winner Take All Society: How More and More Americans Compete for Ever Fewer and Bigger Prizes, Encouraging Economic Waste, Income Inequality, and an Impoverished Cultural Life (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gibson B, Jackson R, Wheeler L (2009) Sixty Feet, Six Inches: A Hall of Fame Pitcher and a Hall of Fame Hitter Talk About How the Game Is Played (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilovich T, Griffin D (2002) Introduction-heuristics and biases: Then and now. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, New York), 1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2011) The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Soc. Problems 58(4):491–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King B, McDonnell M (2014) Good firms, good targets: The relationship between corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World: Toward Effective Global CSR Frameworks. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Major League Baseball (2014) Official Baseball Rules. Accessed March 2014, http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/downloads/y2014/official_baseball_rules.pdf.Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills BM (2014) Social pressure at the plate: Inequality aversion, status, and mere exposure. Managerial Decision Econom. 35(6):387–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moskowitz TJ, Wertheim LJ (2011) Scorecasting: The Hidden Influences Behind How Sports Are Played and Games Are Won (Crown Archetype, New York).Google Scholar
• Parsons CA, Sulaeman J, Yates MC, Hamermesh DS (2011) Strike three: Discrimination, incentives, and evaluation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1410–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearce JL (2011) Status in Management and Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plessner H (2005) Positive and negative effects of prior knowledge on referee decisions in sports. Betsch T, Haberstroh S, eds. The Routines of Decision Making (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 327–342.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM, Phillips DJ (1996) The dynamics of organizational status. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):453–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollis L (2010) Subjectivity objectified: Measuring MLB fans' biases with All-Star votes. Bleacher Report (July 19), http://bleacherreport.com/articles/422086-subjectivity-objectified-measuring-mlb-fans-biases-with-all-star-votes.Google Scholar
• Price J, Wolfers J (2010) Racial discrimination among NBA referees. Quart. J. Econom. 125(4):1859–1887.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rainey DW, Larsen JD, Stephenson A, Coursey S (1989) Accuracy and certainty judgments of umpires and nonumpires. J. Sport Behav. 12(1):12–22.Google Scholar
• Raub W, Weesie J (1990) Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. Amer. J. Sociol. 96(3):626–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value—Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70:367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2001) Gender, status, and leadership. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):637–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Berger J (1986) Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(5):603–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ (2006) Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Soc. Forces 85(1):431–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera L (2012) Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):999–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossman G, Esparza N, Bonacich P (2010) I'd like to thank the academy, team spillovers, and network centrality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Espeland WN (2009) The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lancaster R (2006) Do rankings matter? The effects of U.S. News and World Report rankings on the admissions process of law schools. Law Soc. Rev. 40(1):105–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny JM (2012) Status: Insights from organizational sociology. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38:267–283.Google Scholar
• Schwartz B, Barsky SF (1977) The home advantage. Soc. Forces 55(3):641–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM (2008) Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psych. Bull. 134(2):207–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What's in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57:274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, trans. Wolff KH (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Stern I, Dukerich JM, Zajac E (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 35(4):512–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sykes RE, Clark JP (1975) A theory of deference exchange in police-civilian encounters. Amer. J. Sociol. 81(3):584–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tango TM (2006) Crucial situations. Hardball Times (May 1), http://www.hardballtimes.com/crucial-situations/.Google Scholar
• Thye SR (2000) A status value theory of power in exchange relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(3):407–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner DG, Berger J (2002) Expectation states theory: An evolving research program. Berger J, Zelditch M, eds. New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory (Rowman & Littlefield, Oxford, UK), 41–76.Google Scholar
• Waguespack DM, Sorenson O (2011) The ratings game: Asymmetry in classification. Organ. Sci. 22(3):541–553.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber B (2009) As They See 'em: A Fan's Travels in the Land of Umpires (Scribner, New York).Google Scholar
• Weber M (1978) Economy and Society (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Webster M, Hysom SJ (1998) Creating status characteristics. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 63(3):351–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte WF (1943) Street Corner Society (Chicago University Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Willer R (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Zhou X (2011) Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1435–1448.Link, Google Scholar