Digital Content Provision and Optimal Copyright Protection

References

• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E, Lichtman DG (1999) Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. 42(1):117–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bangeman E (2006) Testing DRM-free waters: EMI selling a few MP3s through Yahoo Music. Ars Technica (December 6), http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2006/12/8368/.Google Scholar
• Besen SM, Kirby SN (1989) Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties. J. Law Econom. 32(2):255–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Astrid AD, Smith MD (2010) A nearly perfect market? Differentiation versus price in consumer choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Png I (2003) Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. System Res. 14(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Conner KR (1995) Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. 41(2):209–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Conner KR, Rumelt RP (1991) Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. 37(2):125–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Foster E (2004) E-books and DRM. InfoWorld (blog), February 19, http://www.gripe2ed.com/scoop/story/2004/2/19/0515/77045=.Google Scholar
• Givon M, Mahajan V, Muller E (1995) Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Marketing 59(1):29–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B, Mahajan V (2005) How much anti-piracy effort is too much? A study of the global software industry. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Mahajan V, Prasad A (2004) The effect of piracy on the market penetration of subscription software. J. Bus. 77(2):S81–S107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. 16(4):393–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Shum M (2006) Using price distributions to estimate search costs. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):257–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui K, Png I (2003) Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions Econom. Anal. Policy 2(1):1160–1184.Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Kuksov D (2010) Consumer feelings and equilibrium product quality. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(1):137–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 27(4):610–626.Link, Google Scholar
• Jobs S (2007) Thoughts on music. Apple.com (February 6), http://web.archive.org/web/20080517114107/http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic.Google Scholar
• Kantor M (2004) Film pirates are robbing us all. Financial Times (November 18), http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1/964afb48-3999-11d9-b822-00000e2511c8.html#axzz387t3aSEr.Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Matutes C (1994) Retail pricing and advertising strategies. J. Bus. 67(3):345–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ (1985) Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. J. Political Econom. 93(5):945–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marechal S (2007) DRM on audio CD’s abolished. LXer.com (January 9), http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/78008/.Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2003) Price uncertainty and consumer search: A structural model of consideration set formation. Marketing Sci. 22(1):58–84.Link, Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Mahajan V (2003) How many pirates should a software firm tolerate? An analysis of piracy protection on the diffusion of software. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 20(4):337–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shy O, Thisse J (1999) A strategic approach to software protection. J. Econom. Management Strategy 8(2):163–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeyama L (1994) The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand externalities. J. Indust. Econom. 42(2):155–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeyama L (1997) The intertemporal consequences of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property. J. Law Econom. 40(2):511–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyagi RK (2004) Technological advances, transaction costs, and consumer welfare. Marketing Sci. 23(3):335–344.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2000) Buying, sharing, and renting information goods. J. Indust. Econom. 48(4):473–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vernik DA, Purohit D, Desai PS (2011) Music downloads and the flip side of digital rights management. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1011–1027.Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (2009) Product variety and endogenous pricing with evaluation costs. Management Sci. 55(8):1338–1346.Link, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1994) Selling formats for search goods. Marketing Sci. 13(3):298–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Xie J, Sirbu M (1995) Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand effect. Management Sci. 41(5):909–926.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar