The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance
Published Online:6 Nov 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
References
- (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):932–968.Google Scholar
- (1999) Giving at the office: A reappraisal of charitable contributions by corporations. Bus. Lawyer 54(3):956–966.Google Scholar
- (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):794–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 69:751–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. J. Marketing 69(3):35–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad. Management J. 42(5):488–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Doing better at doing good. Calif. Management Rev. 47(1):9–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Rev. 85(2):248–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Speaking of the short-term: Discloure horizon and capital market outcomes. HBS Accounting and Management Unit Working Paper 12-072, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
- (1998) Corporate associations in marketing: Antecedents and consequences. Corporate Reputation Rev. 1(3):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. J. Marketing 61(1):68–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Corporate philanthropic practices. J. Corporate Finance 12(5):855–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Do institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Res. 18(2):207–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management J. 35(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 30(8):895–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Making strategy: Learning by doing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(6):141–156.Google Scholar
- (1991) Industrial Marketing: Cases and Concepts (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2007) Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 24(3):224–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2013) The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):50–56.Google Scholar
- (2007) Reputation and its risks. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(2):104–114.Google Scholar
- (2011) Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J. Financial Econom. 101(3):621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Forecasting profitability and earnings. J. Bus. 73(2):161–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Stakeholder engagement in emerging economies: Considering the strategic benefits of stakeholder engagement in a cross-cultural and geopolitical context. Corporate Governance 7(4):379–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective (Piman, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2007) Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
- (2010) Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine 32(33):122–126.Google Scholar
- (1997) An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the twin cities, 1979–81, 1987–89. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):445–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):107–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Linking control systems to business unit strategy: Impact on performance. Accounting, Organ., Soc. 10(1):51–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 39(3):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(9):834–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. Accounting Rev. 72(2):231–255.Google Scholar
- (2010) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J. Appl. Corporate Finance 22(1):32–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Security issue timing: What do managers know, and when do they know it? J. Finance 66(2):413–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Acad. Management Rev. 20(2):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(1):75–85.Google Scholar
- (2008) Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2008) Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. J. Management 34(6):1152–1189.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Acad. Management Rev. 21(3):825–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):182–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. J. Marketing 68(4):16–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):268–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) Why do corporations give to charity? J. Bus. 61(1):65–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. J. Management 35(6):1518–1541.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(1/2):62–77.Google Scholar
- (1988) Mean reversion in stock prices: Evidence and implications. J. Financial Econom. 22(1):27–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. J. Consumer Res. 28(3):399–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Rev. 84(3):937–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. J. Bus. Ethics 101(2):197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11): 1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. Teece DJ, ed. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA), 159–184.Google Scholar
- (1988) On coase, competence, and the corporation. J. Law Econom., Organ. 4(1):163–180.Google Scholar
- (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar

