Corporate Philanthropy and Productivity: Evidence from an Online Real Effort Experiment

References

• Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G, Kranton R (2005) Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(1):9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altmann S, Falk A, Wibral M (2012) Promotions and incentives: The case of multi-stage elimination tournaments. J. Labor Econom. 30(1):149–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917–962.Google Scholar
• Belot M, Duch R, Miller L (2010) Who should be called to the lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. Discussion Paper 2010-001, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77(305):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):616–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brekke K, Nyborg K (2008) Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resource Energy Econom. 30(4):509–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Nygaard K, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2015) Social preferences in the lab: A comparison of students and a representative population. Scandinavian J. Econom. ePub ahead of print May 6, DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12114.Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Crooke M, Reinhardt F, Vasishth V (2009) Households’; willingness to pay for green goods: Evidence from patagonia’s introduction of organic cotton sportswear. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):203–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University (2010) Next generation workplace campaigns. Executive summary. http://www.philanthropy.iupui.edu/files/research/2010workplacegiving_execsummary.pdf.Google Scholar
• Charness G, Kuhn PJ (2011) Lab labor: What can labor economists learn in the lab? Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 229–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Cobo-Reyes R, Jiménez N, Lacomba J, Lagos F (2012) The hidden advantage of delegation: Pareto improvements in a gift exchange game. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2358–2379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cleave BL, Nikiforakis N, Slonim R (2013) Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? Experiment. Econom. 16(3):372–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R (2007) Signaling and screening of workers’; motivation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 62(4):605–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R (2008) Incentives and workers’; motivation in the public sector. Econom. J. 118(525):171–191.Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit (2007) Global business barometer. A survey conducted by the Economist Intelligence Unit on behalf of The Economist, http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/20080116CSRResults.pdf.Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, McManus B (2010) A greater price for a greater good? Evidence that consumers pay more for charity-linked products. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 2(2):28–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans WR, Davis WD (2011) An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Bus. Soc. 50(3):456–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman J (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Meier S, Zehnder C (2013) Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? The case of self-selected student samples. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):839–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehrler S, Kosfeld M (2014) Pro-social missions and worker motivation: An experimental study. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100(4):99–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francois P (2000) “Public service motivation” as an argument for government provision. J. Public Econom. 78(3):275–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Francois P (2007) Making a difference. RAND J. Econom. 38(3):714–732.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuster A, Meier S (2010) Another hidden cost of incentives: The detrimental effect on norm enforcement. Management Sci. 56(1):57–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Giving USA Foundation (2012) Giving USA 2012: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2011. Giving USA Foundation, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson LD (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236–7240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rey-Biel P (2014) On the relative efficiency of performance pay and social incentives. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(1):62–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berg JM (2011) Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM, eds. Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 28–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregg P, Grout PA, Ratcliffe A, Smith S, Windmeijer F (2011) How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services? J. Public Econom. 95(7–8):758–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huck S, Rasul I (2011) Matched fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Public Econom. 95:351–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2014) Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives. J. Public Econom. 114:14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlan D, List J (2007) Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(5):1774–1793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J. Econom. Literature 50(1):51–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koppel H, Regner T (2014) Corporate social responsibility in the work place—Experimental evidence on CSR from a gift-exchange game. Experiment. Econom. 17(3):347–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linardi S, McConnell MA (2011) No excuses for good behavior: Volunteering and the social environment. J. Public Econom. 95(5–6):445–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (2007) The motivation and bias of bureaucrats. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):180–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Shearer BS (2004) Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):513–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slonim R, Wang C, Garbarino E, Merrett D (2013) Opting-in: Participation bias in economic experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 90:43–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stites JP, Michael JH (2011) Organizational commitment in manufacturing employees: Relationships with corporate social performance. Bus. Soc. 50(1):50–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2010) Disentangling the sources of prosocially motivated effort: A field experiment. J. Public Econom. 94(11–12):1086–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2013) Sharing one’s fortune? An experimental study on earned income and giving. Discussion Paper 7294, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar