Of Age, Sex, and Money: Insights from Corporate Officer Compensation on the Wage Inequality Between Genders

References

• Abowd JM, Creecy RH, Kramarz F (2002) Computing person and firm effects using linked longitudinal employer-employee data. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Technical Paper 2002-06, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Abowd JM, Kramarz F, Margolis DN (1999) High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica 67:251–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Funk P (2012) Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Sci. 58:219–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal NC (1981) Determinants of executive compensation. Indust. Relations: J. Econom. Soc. 20:35–45.Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 65:715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque A (2009) Peer firms in relative performance evaluation. J. Accounting Econom. 48:69–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque AM, Franco GD, Verdi RS (2013) Peer choice in CEO compensation. J. Financial Econom. 108:160–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amore MD, Garofalo O, Minichilli A (2014) Gender interactions within the family firm. Management Sci. 60:1083–1097.Link, Google Scholar
• Apesteguia J, Azmat G, Iriberri N (2012) The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Sci. 58:78–93.Link, Google Scholar
• Atkinson SM, Baird SB, Frye MB (2003) Do female mutual fund managers manage differently? J. Financial Res. 26:1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayres I, Siegelman P (1995) Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85:304–321.Google Scholar
• Azmat G, Ferrer R (2012) Gender gaps in performance: Evidence from young lawyers. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
• Bagues MF, Esteve-Volart B (2010) Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77:1301–1328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77:1047–1094.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bär M, Niessen-Ruenzi A, Ruenzi S (2013) The impact of work group diversity on performance: Large sample evidence from the mutual fund industry. Working paper, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. 116:261–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbezat DA (1991) Updating estimates of male-female salary differentials in the academic labor market. Econom. Lett. 36:191–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck T, Behr P, Guettler A (2013) Gender and banking: Are women better loan officers? Rev. Finance 17:1279–1321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2005) Do cognitive test scores explain higher U.S. wage inequality? Rev. Econom. Statist. 87:184–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2006) The US gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 60:45–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brick IE, Palmon O, Wald JK (2006) CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? J. Corporate Finance 12:403–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broder IE (1993) Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83:964–970.Google Scholar
• Cárdenas J-C, Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2012) Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: Comparing children in Colombia and Sweden. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83:11–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2009) CEO compensation and board structure. J. Finance 64:231–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CONSAD Research Corporation (2009) An analysis of the reasons for the disparity in wages between men and women. Report for the U.S. Department of Labor, CONSAD Research Corporation, Pittsburgh. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Core JE, Holthausen RW, Larcker DF (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 51:371–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47:448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta S, Iskandar-Datta M, Raman K (2001) Executive compensation and corporate acquisition decisions. J. Finance 56:2299–2336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deaux K (1996) Social identification. Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford Press, New York), 777–798.Google Scholar
• Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31:305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dittrich M, Knabe A, Leipold K (2014) Gender differences in experimental wage negotiations. Econom. Inquiry 52:862–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchin R, Sosyura D (2013) Divisional managers and internal capital markets. J. Finance 68:387–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson KH, Sandberg A (2012) Gender differences in initiation of negotiation: Does the gender of the negotiation counterpart matter? Negotiation J. 24:355–363.Google Scholar
• Farrell KA, Hersch PL (2005) Additions to the corporate boards: The effect of gender. J. Corporate Finance 11:85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson SC, Vetsuypens MR (1993) CEO compensation in financially distressed firms: An empirical analysis. J. Finance 48:425–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser M, de Silanes FL, Sautner Z (2013) Opening the black box: Internal capital markets and managerial power. J. Finance 68:1577–1631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118:1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Harvey CR, Puri M (2011) Capital allocation and delegation of decision-making authority within firms. NBER Working Paper 17370, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Li S, Qiu J (2013) Managerial attributes and executive compensation. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:144–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harford J, Li K (2007) Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs. J. Finance 62:917–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartzell JC, Starks LT (2003) Institutional investors and executive compensation. J. Finance 58:2351–2374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlett SA (2002) Executive women and the myth of having it all. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(4):66–73.Google Scholar
• Hogg MA (2002) Social categorization, depersonalization and group behavior. Hogg MA, Tindale S, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 56–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffman ML (2004) Gender inequality across local wage hierarchies. Work Occupations 31:323–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1997) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. J. Finance 48:831–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J. Political Econom. 98:225–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin L (2002) CEO compensation, diversification, and incentives. J. Financial Econom. 66:29–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Kuennen E (2006) Basic math skills and the performance in an introductory statistics course. J. Statistics Ed. 14. http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v14n2/johnson.html.Google Scholar
• Komives SR (1991) The relationship of same- and cross-gender work pairs to staff performance and supervisor leadership in residence hall units. Sex Roles 24:355–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee PM, James EH (2007) She'-e-os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management J. 28:227–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levi M, Li K, Zhang F (2010) Deal or no deal: Hormones and the mergers and acquisitions game. Management Sci. 56:1462–1483.Link, Google Scholar
• Levi M, Li K, Zhang F (2013) Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. J. Corporate Finance, ePub ahead of print November 13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005.Google Scholar
• Martin AD, Nishikawa T, Williams MA (2009) CEO gender: Effects on valuation and risk. Quart. J. Financing Accounting 48:23–40.Google Scholar
• Mehran H (1995) Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 38:163–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ (1999) Executive compensation. Ashenfelter OC, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3B (North Holland, Amsterdam), 2485–2563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Partnership for Women and Families (2013) New study, released for equal pay day, finds gender-based wage gaps in country’s 50 largest metropolitan areas and all 50 states. Press release, April 8, 2013, http://www.nationalpartnership.org/news-room/press-releases/new-study-released-for-equal-pay-day.html.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122:1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niessen A, Ruenzi S (2007) Sex matters: Gender differences in a professional setting. CFR Working Paper 06-01, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Yermack D (2000) Taking stock: Equity-based compensation and the evolution of managerial ownership. J. Finance 55:1367–1384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogden JA, Zsidisin GA, Hendrick TE (2002) Factors that influence chief purchasing officer compensation. J. Supply Chain Management 38:30–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Main BG, Crystal GS (1988) CEO compensation as tournament and social comparison: A tale of two theories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 33:257–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2010) Geographic variation in the gender differences in test scores. J. Econom. Perspect. 24:95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan HE, Wiggins RA (2004) Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. J. Financial Econom. 73:497–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Stitt C, Price K, Kipnis D (1983) Sex of leader, leader behavior, and subordinate satisfaction. Sex Roles 9:31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Bosman R, Kocher MG, van Winden F (2009) Gender pairing and bargaining—Beware the same sex! Experiment. Econom. 12:318–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psych. Intergroup Relations 81:7–24.Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Weber A, Zulehner C (2010) Female hires and the success of start-up firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:358–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1995) Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? J. Financial Econom. 39:237–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J. Financial Econom. 40:185–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2004) Remuneration, retention, and reputation incentives for outside directors. J. Finance 59:2281–2308.Crossref, Google Scholar