Buy-It-Now or Take-a-Chance: Price Discrimination Through Randomized Auctions

References

• Abraham I, Athey S, Babioff M, Grubb M (2010) Peaches, lemons and cookies: The impact of information structure on revenue in common value auctions. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2011-68, January 2011.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Nekipelov D (2010) A structural model of sponsored search advertising auctions. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Backus M, Lewis G (2012) A demand system for a dynamic auction market with directed search. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR, Besbes O, Weintraub GY (2013) Auctions for online display advertising exchanges: Approximations and design. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 53–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balseiro SR, Feldman J, Mirrokni VS, Muthukrishnan S (2011) Yield optimization of display advertising with ad exchange. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 27–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A (2011) Targeting in advertising markets: Implications for offline versus online media. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):417–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Pesendorfer M (2007) Information structures in optimal auctions. J. Econom. Theory 137(1):580–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Bonatti A, Said M (2011) Product design in ad exchanges. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bhalgat A, Feldman J, Mirrokni VS (2012) Online allocation of display ads with smooth delivery. Yang Q, Agarwal D, Pei J, eds. Proc. 18th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 1213–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Board S, Skrzypacz A (2013) Revenue management with forward-looking buyers. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Budish E, Takeyama L (2001) Buy prices in online auctions: Irrationality on the Internet. Econom. Lett. 72(3):325–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Klemperer P (1996) Auctions versus negotiations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(1):180–194.Google Scholar
• Chu CS, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Bundle-size pricing as an approximation to mixed bundling. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1): 263–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Courty P, Li H (2000) Sequential screening. Rev. Econom. Stud. 67(4): 697–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crémer J, McLean R (1988) Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions. Econometrica 56(6): 1247–1257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobzinski S, Lavi R, Nisan N (2012) Multi-unit auctions with budget limits. Games Econom. Behav. 74(2):486–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwartz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eso P, Szentes B (2007) Optimal information disclosure in auctions and the handicap auction. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(3):705–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Even-Dar E, Kearns MJ, Wortman J (2007) Sponsored search with contexts. Internet and Network Economics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4858 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 312–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman J, Korula N, Mirrokni VS, Muthukrishnan S, Pál M (2009) Online ad assignment with free disposal. Internet and Network Economics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5929 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 374–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gershkov A, Moldovanu B, Strack P (2014) Dynamic allocation and learning with strategic arrivals. Working paper, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Nazerzadeh H, Sundararajan M (2007) Computing optimal bundles for sponsored search. Internet Network Econom., Third Internat. Workshop (WINE) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 576–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Online display advertising: Targeting and intrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011b) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Haile PA, Tamer E (2003) Inference with an incomplete model of english auctions. J. Political Econom. 111(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartline JD, Roughgarden T (2009) Simple versus optimal mechanisms. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 8(1):Article 5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson G (2013) The impact of privacy policy on the auction market for online display advertising. Simon School Working Paper FR 13-26, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kakade SM, Lobel I, Nazerzadeh H (2013) Optimal dynamic mechanism design and the virtual pivot mechanism. Oper. Res. 61(4): 837–854.Link, Google Scholar
• Levin J, Milgrom P (2010) Online advertising: Heterogeneity and conflation in market design. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. 100(2):603–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2011) Does retail advertising work? Measuring the effects of advertising on sales via a controlled experiment on Yahoo! Yahoo! Research working paper, Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA.Google Scholar
• Lewis T, Sappington D (1994) Supplying information to facilitate price discrimination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 35(2):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madarász K, Prat A (2010) Screening with an approximate type space. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Mahdian M, Ghosh A, McAfee RP, Vassilvitskii S (2012) To match or not to match: Economics of cookie matching in online advertising. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 741–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Riley J (1984) Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica 52(6):1473–1518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP (2011) The design of advertising exchanges. Rev. Indust. Organ. 39(3):169–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, Vassilvitskii S (2012) An overview of practical exchange design. Current Sci. 103(9):1056–1063.Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J, Whinston MD (1989) Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J.Econom. 104(2):371–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, Papineni K, Vassilvitskii S (2013) Maximally representative allocations for guaranteed delivery advertising campaigns. Rev. Econom. Design 17(2):83–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Shannon C (1994) Monotone comparative statics. Econometrica 62(1):157–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR, Weber RJ (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5):1089–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthukrishnan S (2009) Ad exchanges: Research issues. Internet and Network Economics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5929 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1981) Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. 6(1): 58–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2009) Reserve prices in Internet advertising auctions: A field experiment. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Pagan A, Ullah A (1999) Nonparametric Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou CH, Pierrakos G (2011) On optimal single-item auctions. Fortnow L, Vadhan SP, eds. Proc. Forty-Third Annual ACM Sympos. Theory of Computing (STOC ’11) (ACM, New York), 119–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radovanovic A, Zeevi A (2010) Revenue maximization through “smart” inventory management in reservation-based online advertising. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Rev. 38(2): 33–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds SS, Wooders J (2009) Auctions with a buy price. Econom. Theory 38:9–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riley JG, Samuelson WF (1981) Optimal auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):381–392.Google Scholar
• Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 11(4):341–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian H (2007) Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(7): 1163–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar