What Death Can Tell: Are Executives Paid for Their Contributions to Firm Value?

References

• Aggarwal R, Samwick A (1999) The other side of the trade-off: The impact of risk on executive compensation. J. Political Econom. 107:65–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alder S (2012) In the wrong hands: Complementarities, resource allocation, and aggregate TFP. Working paper. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Fried J (2004) Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Cremers M, Peyer U (2011) The CEO pay slice. J. Financial Econom. 102:199–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L, Grinstein Y, Peyer U (2010) Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. J. Finance 65:2363–2401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennedsen M, Pérez-González F, Wolfenzon D (2007) Do CEOs matter? Working paper, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Are CEOs paid for luck? The ones without principals are. Quart. J. Econom. 116:901–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effects of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118:1169–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bizjak J, Lemmon M, Naveen L (2008) Has the use of peer groups contributed to higher levels of executive compensation? J. Financial Econom. 90:152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borokhovich K, Brunarski K, Donahue M, Harman Y (2006) The importance of board quality in the event of CEO death. Financial Rev. 41:307–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter C, Lorsch JW (2003) Back to the Drawing Board: Designing Corporate Boards for a Complex World (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Dasgupta S, Hilary G (2010) CEO ability, pay, and firm performance. Management Sci. 56:1633–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Core J, Holthausen R, Larcker D (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. J. Financial Econom. 51:371–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremers M, Grinstein Y (2014) Does the market for CEO talent explain controversial CEO pay practices? Rev. Finance. 18:921–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahiya S, Yermack D (2008) You can’t take it with you: Sunset provisions for equity compensation when managers, retire, resign, or die. J. Corporate Finance 14:499–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes N, Ferreira M, Matos P, Murphy K (2013) Are U.S. CEOs paid more? New international evidence. Rev. Financial Stud. 26:323–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C (2007) Rising through the ranks: The evolution of the market for corporate executive, 1936–2003. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Jenter D (2010) CEO compensation. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 2:75–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Saks R (2010) Executive compensation: A new view from a long-term perspective, 1936–2005. Rev. Financial Stud. 55:458–481.Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Landier A (2008) Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quart. J. Econom. 123:49–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Rossi-Hansberg E (2006) Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy. Quart. J. Econom. 121:1383–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giannetti M (2011) Serial CEO incentives and the structure of managerial contracts. J. Financial Intermediation 20:633–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinstein Y, Weinbaum D, Yehuda N (2009) Perks and excess: Evidence from the new executive compensation disclosure rules. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Harris M, Holmstrom B (1982) A theory of wage dynamics. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49:315–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R, Schaefer S (1999) How much are differences in managerial abilities worth? J. Accounting Econom. 27:125–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R, Schaefer S (2009) CEO pay and the Lake Wobegon effect. J. Financial Econom. 94:280–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88:96–118.Google Scholar
• Huson M, Parrino R, Starks L (2001) Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. J. Finance 56:2265–2297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M, Murphy K (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J. Political Econom. 98:225–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Magee R, Nagarajan N, Newman H (1985) An analysis of the stock price reaction to sudden executive death: Implications for the management labor market. J. Accounting Econom. 7:151–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen C, Niessen A (2012) Public opinion and executive compensation. Management Sci. 58:1249–1272.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuhnen C, Zwiebel J (2009) Executive pay, hidden compensation, and managerial entrenchment. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Lazear E, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. 89:841–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas R (1978) On the size distribution of business firms. Bell J. Econom. 9:508–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marin D, Verdier T (2012) Globalization and the empowerment of talent. J. Internat. Econom. 86:209–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K (1999) Executive compensation. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labour Economics, Vol. 3B, Chap. 38 (North Holland, Amsterdam, New York), 2485–2563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K, Zábojnik K (2007) CEO pay and turnover: A market-based explanation for recent trends. Amer. Econom. Rev. P&P 49:192–196.Google Scholar
• Nguyen BD, Nielsen KM (2010) The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths. J. Financial Econom. 98:550–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters FS, Wagner AF (2014) The executive turnover risk premium. J. Finance 69:1529–1563Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71:845–858.Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1982) Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings. Bell J. Econom. 13:311–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1992) Contracts and the market for executives. Werin L, Wijkander H, eds. Contract Economics (Blackwell Publishers Cambridge, MA), 181–211.Google Scholar
• Salas J (2010) Entrenchment, governance, and the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths. J. Banking Finance 34:656–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shivdasani A, Yermack D (1999) CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. J. Finance 54:1829–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovin M, Sushka M (1993) Ownership concentration, corporate control activity, and firm value: Evidence from the death of inside blockholders. J. Finance 48:1293–1321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor L (2010) Why are CEOs rarely fired? Evidence from structural estimation. J. Finance 65:2051–2087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor L (2013) CEO wage dynamics: Evidence from a learning model. J. Financial Econom. 108:79–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terviö M (2008) The difference that CEOs make: An assignment model approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98:642–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Worrell D, Davidson W, Chandy P, Garrison S (1986) Management turnover through deaths of key executives: Effects on investor wealth. Acad. Management J. 29:674–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1997) Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. J. Finance 52:449–476.Crossref, Google Scholar