Performance Information, Production Uncertainty, and Subjective Entitlements in Bargaining

References

• Anbarci N, Feltovich N (2013) How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs? Experiment. Econom. 16(4):560–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anbarci N, Feltovich N (2014) How responsive are people to changes in their bargaining position? Earned bargaining power and the 50–50 norm. Working paper, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Wang X (1995a) The relationship between uncertainty, the contract zone, and efficiency in a bargaining experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 27(3):475–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Wang X, Loewenstein G (1996) Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias. Quart. J. Econom. 111(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Issacharoff S, Camerer C (1995b) Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(5):1337–1343.Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan PV, Gómez JC, Vohra RV (2011) The tempered aspirations solution for bargaining problems with a reference point. Math. Soc. Sci. 62(3):144–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman MH, Neale MA (1992) Negotiating Rationally (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Birkeland S, Tungodden B (2014) Fairness motivation in bargaining: A matter of principle. Theory Decision 77(1):125–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blavatskyy PR (2009) Betting on own knowledge: Experimental test of overconfidence. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(1):39–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Karagözoğlu E (2012) On the interaction of hard and soft bargaining leverage: A test of Schelling’s hypothesis and a modified Zeuthen-Harsanyi model. Technical report, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
• Buchan NR, Croson RT, Johnson EJ (2004) When do fair beliefs influence bargaining behavior? Experimental bargaining in Japan and the United States. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):181–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burrows P, Loomes G (1994) The impact of fairness on bargaining behaviour. Empirical Econom. 19(2):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Loewenstein G (1993) Information, fairness and efficiency in bargaining. Mellers BA, Baron J, eds. Psychological Perspectives on Justice. Theory and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 155–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelen AW, Hole AD, Sørenson EØ, Tungodden B (2007) The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):818–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Haruvy EE (2000) Self-serving biases: Evidence from a simulated labour relationship. J. Managerial Psych. 15(7):655–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cherry TL, Frykblom P, Shogren JF (2002) Hardnose the dictator. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):1218–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christie R (1970) Scale construction. Christie R, Geis F, eds. Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York), 10–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark J (1998) Fairness in public good provision: An investigation of preferences for equality and proportionality. Canadian J. Econom. 31(3):708–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compte O, Jehiel P (2003) Bargaining with reference dependent preferences. Working paper, Paris School of Economics, Paris.Google Scholar
• Corfman TA, Schmeltzer J (2002) UAL machinists reject cuts. All other unions OK lower wages. Chicago Tribune (December 28), http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-12-28/news/0212280158_1_wage-cuts-union-contracts-machinists.Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Gneezy U, Rottenstreich Y (2008) The power of focal points is limited: Even minute payoff asymmetry may yield large coordination failures. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1443–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, Sunde U, Schupp J, Wagner GG (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 9(3): 522–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duval TS, Silvia PJ (2002) Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(1):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frohlich N, Oppenheimer J, Kurki A (2004) Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test. Public Choice 119(1–2):91–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Riedl A (2005) Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims. Management Sci. 51(2):249–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Riedl A (2006) Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims: Normative judgments and actual negotiations. Soc. Choice Welfare 27:571–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gantner A, Güth W, Königstein M (2001) Equitable choices in bargaining games with joint production. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 46(2):209–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gantner A, Horn K, Kerschbamer R (2013) Fair division in unanimity bargaining with subjective claims. Working paper, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Livne ZA (1988) Resolving a conflict situation with a reference outcome: An axiomatic model. Management Sci. 34(11):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1985) Entitlements, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. J. Legal Stud. 14(2):259–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E, McCabe K, Shachat K, Smith V (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games Econom. Behav. 7(3):346–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyndman K (2011) Repeated bargaining with reference-dependent preferences. Internat. J. Game Theory 40(3):527–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 45(3):513–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karagözoğlu E (2012) Bargaining games with joint production. Bolton GE, Croson RT, eds. Oxford Handbook of Economic Conflict Resolution (Oxford University Press, New York), 359–372.Google Scholar
• Konow J (1996) A positive theory of economic fairness. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 31(1):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledyard JO (2008) Market failure. Durlauf ESN, Blume LE, eds. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK), http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_M000056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D (2007) Bargaining with history-dependent preferences. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):695–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Moore DA (2004) When ignorance is bliss: Information exchange and inefficiency in bargaining. J. Legal Stud. 33(1):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhan WJ, Poulsen O, Roos MW (2013) Unstructured bargaining over an endogenously produced surplus and fairness ideals: An experiment. Ruhr Econom. Papers 438.Google Scholar
• Lyons T (2009) Views on the news: Anger and sarcasm at findings of Guardian pay survey. Guardian (September 18), http://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/sep/18/views-on-the-news-pay.Google Scholar
• Messick DM, Sentis KP (1979) Fairness and preference. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 15(4):418–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash JF Jr (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nydegger RV, Owen G (1975) Two-person bargaining: An experimental test of the Nash axioms. Internat. J. Game Theory 3(4):239–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortutay B (2008) Take-Two’s “Grand Theft Auto IV” tops $500M in week 1 sales. USA Today (May 7), http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/topstories/2008-05-07-1908764460_x.htm.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1995) Bargaining experiments. Kagel JH, Roth AE, eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 253–348.Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Malouf MWK (1979) Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psych. Rev. 86(6):574–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Murnighan KJ (1982) The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study. Econometrica 50(5):1123–1142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling T (1960) Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schiesel S (2008) A video game star and his less-than-stellar pay. New York Times (May 21), http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/21/arts/television/21gta.html.Google Scholar
• Schlicht E (1998) On Custom in the Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel S, Fouraker LE (1960) Bargaining and Group Decision Making: Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Thompson L, Loewenstein G (1992) Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):176–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game-theoretic analyses of bankruptcy and taxation problems: A survey. Math. Soc. Sci. 45(3):249–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Totilo S (2008) “Grand Theft Auto IV” posts record first-week sales. MTV News (May 7), http://www.mtv.com/news/1586971/grand-theft-auto-iv-posts-record-first-week-sales/.Google Scholar
• Wittig MA, Marks G, Jones GA (1981) Luck versus effort attributions: Effect on reward allocations to self and other. Personal Soc. Psych. Bull. 7(1):71–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeuthen F (1930) Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M (1979) Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. J. Personality 47(2):245–287.Crossref, Google Scholar