Competing with Privacy
Published Online:15 Jan 2015https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2023
References
- (2005) Conditioning prices on purchase history. Marketing Sci. 24(3):367–381.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Research note: Customer intimacy and cross-selling strategy. Management Sci. 51(6):1007–1012.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Outsourcing, information leakage, and consulting firms. RAND J. Econom. 38(1):269–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Everything we know about what data brokers know about you. ProPublica (June 13), http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-about-what-data-brokers-know-about-you.Google Scholar
- (2003) Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) On the optimality of privacy in sequential contracting. J. Econom. Theory 130(1):168–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Strategies to fight ad-sponsored rivals. Management Sci. 56(9):1484–1499.Link, Google Scholar
- (2005) Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management 6(2–3):181–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Hide and seek: Costly consumer privacy in a market with repeat purchases. Marketing Sci. 31(2):277–292.Link, Google Scholar
- Federal Trade Commission (2000) FTC sues failed website, Toysmart.com, for deceptively offering for sale personal information of website visitors. Press release, July 10, 2000, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC. http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2000/07/ftc-sues-failed-website-toysmartcom-deceptively-offering-sale.Google Scholar
- (2010) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Privacy, property rights and efficiency: The economics of privacy as secrecy. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(3):209–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) The economics of privacy. Hendershott T, ed. Handbooks in Information Systems, Vol. 1 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 471–498.Google Scholar
- (1995a) Privacy in telecommunications: Markets, rights, and regulations. Part I. New Telecom Quart. 3(2):52–59.Google Scholar
- (1995b) Privacy in telecommunications: Markets, rights, and regulations. Part III. New Telecom Quart. 3(4):51–60.Google Scholar
- (1981) The economics of privacy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):405–409.Google Scholar
- (2013) The privacy landscape: Product differentiation on data collection. Schneier B, ed. Economics of Information Security and Privacy III (Springer Science+Business Media, New York), 263–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Negative externalities and evolutionary implementation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 72(3):885–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The map of commerce: Internet search, competition, and the circular flow of information. J. Competition Law Econom. 5(4):633–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) An introduction to privacy in economics and politics. J. Legal Stud. 9(4):623–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):631–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):546–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Information overload in a network of targeted communication. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):542–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. 44(3):345–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) How online users feel about behavioral marketing and how adoption of privacy and security policies could affect their feelings. Report, Privacy Consulting Group, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

