Dynamic Commercialization Strategies for Disruptive Technologies: Evidence from the Speech Recognition Industry

References

• Adner R (2002) When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. 23(8):667–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Zemsky P (2005) Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. RAND J. Econom. 36(2):229–254.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Nandkumar A (2011) Cash-out or flameout! Opportunity cost and entrepreneurial strategy. Management Sci. 57(10):1844–1860.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Indust. Corporate Change 10(2):419–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhide A (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower JL, Christensen CM (1995) Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Bus. Rev. (January–February).Google Scholar
• Brodsky I (2008) The History of Wireless: How Creative Minds Produced Technology for the Masses (Telescope Books, St. Louis, MO).Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Ueda M (2006) Optimal project rejection and new firm start-ups. Management Sci. 52(2):262–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Fabrizio K (2013) Does the market for ideas influence the rate and direction of innovative activity? Evidence from the medical device industry. Working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Turut Ö (2013) Context-dependent preferences and innovation strategy. Management Sci. 59(12):2747–2765.Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma (Harper Collins Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower J (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Rosenbloom RS (1995) Explaining the attacker’s advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Res. Policy 24(2):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Creitz W (1982) Monthly news briefs. VoiceNews (May).Google Scholar
• Creitz W (1984) Monthly news briefs. VoiceNews (September).Google Scholar
• Dahlin K, Behrens D (2005) When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Res. Policy 34(5):717–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einstein D (2000) Speech recognition leader can’t make itself clear. Forbes (September 29), http://www.forbes.com/2000/10/02/1002global.html.Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A (2006) The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1141–1158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster RN (1986) Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage (Summit Books, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS (2012) Negotiating for the market. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Hsu DH, Stern S (2002) When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND J. Econom. 33(4):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2000) Incumbency and R&D incentives: Licensing the gale of creative destruction. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):485–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2003) The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin J (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Lieberman M (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2006) Venture capitalists and cooperative commercialization strategy. Management Sci. 52(2):204–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M (2000) How the incumbent can win: Managing technological transitions in the semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 46(2):169–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Juang B, Rabiner L, eds. (2004) Automatic Speech Recognition—A Brief History of the Technology Development (Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Elsevier).Google Scholar
• King A, Tucci C (2002) Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. 48(2):171–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Maremont M, Eisinger J, Song MY (2000) Lernout & Hauspie surges in Korea, raising questions. Wall Street Journal (August 8).Google Scholar
• Meisel W (2002) Nuance to shift strategy and depend less on partners. Speech Recognition Update 114:1–23.Google Scholar
• Mitchell W (1989) Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfield. Admin. Sci. Quart. 34(2):208–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Adv. Strategic Management 21:45–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1967) Technological forecasting in perspective. Report, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
• Phillips M (2013) Personal communication with Matt Marx, April 26, 2013, Boston.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31:439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viterbi A (2012) Personal communication via email with Matt Marx, November 2012.Google Scholar
• Walls & Associates (2010) National Establishment Time-Series (NETS) Database, October 2011.Google Scholar