Bang for the Buck: Gain-Loss Ratio as a Driver of Judgment and Choice

References

• Abdellaoui M, Bleichrodt H, Paraschiv C (2007) Measuring loss aversion: A parameter-free approach. Management Sci. 53:1659–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson NH, Shanteau JC (1970) Information integration in risky decision making. J. Experiment. Psych. 84:441–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels D (2006) Proportion dominance: The generality and variability of favoring relative savings over absolute savings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 100:76–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bateman I, Dent S, Peters E, Slovic P, Starmer C (2007) The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. J. Behav. Dec. Making 20:365–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battalio RC, Kagel JH, Jiranyakul K (1990) Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. J. Risk Uncertainty 3:25–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5:323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1999) Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Sci. 45:364–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH, Bahra JP (2007) Gain-loss separability and coalescing in risky decision making. Management Sci. 53:1016–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandstatter E, Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R (2006) The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psych. Rev. 113:409–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cartwright D (1941) Decision-time in relation to the differentiation of the phenomenal field. Psych. Rev. 48:425–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Langhe B, van Osselaer SMJ, Wierenga B (2011) The effects of process and outcome accountability on judgment process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115:238–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elner RW, Hughes RN (1978) Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab. J. Animal Ecol. 47:103–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erev I, Ert E, Yechiam E (2008) Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the effect of experience on repeated decisions. J. Behav. Decision Making 21:575–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ert E, Erev I (2008) The rejection of attractive gambles, loss aversion, and the lemon avoidance heuristic. J. Econom. Psych. 29: 715–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1943) Studies in decision: I. Decision-time, relative frequency of judgment and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus difference. Psych. Rev. 32:291–306.Google Scholar
• Gallistel CR (1990) The Organization of Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Goldstein WM, Einhorn HJ (1987) Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psych. Rev. 94:236–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK (1998) Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. J. Behav. Dec. Making 11:107–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Rottenstreich Y (2004) Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. J. Experiment. Psych: Gen. 133: 23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Zhang J (2010) General evaluability theory. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 5:343–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Rottenstreich Y, Xiao Z (2005) When more is better: On the relationship between magnitude and subjective value. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 14:234–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Loewenstein GF, Blount S, Bazerman MH (1999) Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psych. Bull. 125:576–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kermer DA, Driver-Linn E, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2006) Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psych. Sci. 17:649–653.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keysar B, Hayakawa SL, Gyu An S (2012) The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psych. Sci. 23:661–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy H, Markowitz HM (1979) Approximating expected utility by a function of mean and variance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 69:308–317.Google Scholar
• Luce DR (2000) Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches (Erlbaum, New York).Google Scholar
• March J, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33:1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7:77–91.Google Scholar
• Meng X-L, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB (1992) Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psych. Bull. 111:172–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J (1987) Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 77:421–430.Google Scholar
• Mosteller F, Nogee P (1951) An experimental measurement of utility. J. Political Econom. 59:371–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilsson H, Rieskamp J, Wagenmakers E-J (2011) Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory. J. Math. Psych. 55:84–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacini R, Epstein S (1999) The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76:972–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pascal B (1966) Pensées (A. J. Krailsheimer, translator) (Penguin, New York). [First published in 1670.]Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1982) Contingent decision behavior. Psych. Bull. 2:382–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters E, Vastfjall D, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Mazzocco K, Dickert S (2006) Numeracy and decision making. Psych. Sci. 17:407–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Por H, Budescu DV (2013) Revisiting the gain-loss separability assumption in prospect theory. J. Behav. Dec. Making 26:385–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Meth. Instr. Comp. 36:717–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66:497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Frederick S, Scholten M (2013) DRIFT: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn. Memory, Cognition. 39:573–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y, Hsee CK (2001) Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psych. Sci. 12:185–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Royzman EB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5:296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics. 2:369–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1968) Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. J. Experiment. Psych. 3:1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 24:311–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith EA (1979) Human adaptation and energetic efficiency. Human Ecol. 7:53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sussman AB, Shafir E (2012) On assets and debt in the psychology of perceived wealth. Psych. Sci. 23:101–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Tversky A, Kahneman D, Schwartz A (1997) The effect of myopic loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quart. J. Econom. 112:647–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman, D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5:297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wright JH (2001) The influence of absolute differences and relative sifferences on unidimensional difference judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Wu G, Gonzalez R (1996) Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. 42:1676–1690.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Markle AB (2008) An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory. Management Sci. 54:1322–1335.Link, Google Scholar
• Wu G, Zhang J, Gonzalez R (2004) Decision under risk. Koehler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 399–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yechiam E, Hochman G (2013) Losses as modulators of attention: Reviews and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains. Psych. Bull. 139:497–518.Crossref, Google Scholar