The Hidden Cost of Accommodating Crowdfunder Privacy Preferences: A Randomized Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2069

References

  • Acquisti A, John L, Loewenstein G (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2014) Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 14 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 63–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks and the timing of investment decisions. J. Economics Management Strategy. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahlers GKC, Cumming D, Gunther C, Schweizer D (2012) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Working paper, A.T. Kearney, Berlin.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J, Bernheim BD (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Levav J (2000) Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. J. Consumer Res. 27(3):279–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G (2011) Herding behavior as a network externality. ICIS 2011 Proc. (Association of Information Systems, Champaign, IL), Paper 28.Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, Di Benedetto CA, Mudambi SM (2013a) Leveraging information systems for enhanced product innovation. Martínez López FJ, ed. Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management (Springer, Berlin), 211–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013b) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014a) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of pro-social lending. MIS Quart. 38(3):773–794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014b) Secret admirers: Examining the antecedents and consequences of crowdfunder information hiding. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
  • Das S, Kramer A (2013) Self-censorship on Facebook. Proc. 7th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs and Social Media (CWSM) (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA), 120–127.Google Scholar
  • Daughety AF, Reinganum JF (2010) Public goods, social pressure, and the choice between privacy and publicity. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 2(2):191–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback. Management Sci. 49(10): 1407–1424.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Egelman S, Tsai JY, Cranor LF, Acquisti A (2009) Timing is everything? Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI 2009) (ACM Press, New York), 319–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10): 1498–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B (2012) Designing ranking systems for hotels on travel search engines by mining user-generated and crowdsourced content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):493–520.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2012) Shifts in privacy concerns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(3):349–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzenstein M, Dholakia U, Andrews RL (2011a) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herzenstein M, Sonenshein S, Dholakia UM (2011b) Tell me a good story and I may lend you money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. J. Marketing Res. 48(Special issue):S138–S149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochberg Y, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. J. Finance 62(1):251–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman BA, Adar E, Fine L (2005) Valuating privacy. IEEE Security Privacy 3(5):22–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui K, Teo HH, Lee ST (2007) The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. 31(1):19–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2011) Strangers on a plane: Context-dependent willingness to divulge sensitive information. J. Consumer Res. 37(5):858–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joinson AN, Paine C, Buchanan T, Reips U (2008) Measuring self-disclosure online: Blurring and non-response to sensitive items in Web-based surveys. Comput. Human Behav. 24(5):2158–2171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K, Hann I (2013) Does crowdfunding democratize access to capital? A geographical analysis. Presentation, INFORMS Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST 2013), October 5, INFORMS, Catonsville, MD.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim K, Viswanathan S (2014) The experts in the crowd: The role of reputable investors in a crowdfunding market. Working paper, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  • Lin M, Viswanathan S (2013) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowd funding market. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  • Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ordanini A, Miceli L, Pizzetti M, Parasuraman A (2010) Crowd-funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J. Service Management 22(4):443–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sleeper M, Balebako R, Das S, McConahy AL, Wiese J, Cranor LF (2013) The post that wasn’t: Exploring self-censorship on Facebook. Proc. 2013 Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (CSCW) (ACM Press, New York), 793–802.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen M (2007) How smart is smart money? A two-sided matching model of venture capital. J. Finance 62(6):2725–2762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O, Stuart T (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strandburg KJ (2005) Social norms, self control, and privacy in the online world. Strandburg KJ, Raicu DS, eds. Privacy and Technologies of Identity: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation (Springer, New York), 31–54.Google Scholar
  • Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker CE (2014) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):546–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Z (2010) Anonymity, social image, and the competition for volunteers: A case study of the online market for reviews. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 10(1):Article 44.Google Scholar
  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wattal S, Telang R, Mukhopadhyay T, Boatwright P (2012) What’s in a “name”? Impact of use of customer information in e-mail advertisements. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3, Part 1):679–697.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wetzel WE (1987) The informal venture capital market: Aspects of scale and efficiency. J. Bus. Venturing 2(4):299–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Younkin P, Kashkooli K (2013) A crowd or a community? Working paper, McGill University, Montréal.Google Scholar
  • Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang M, Zhu F (2011) Group size and incentive to contribute: A natural experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(4):1601–1615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zvilichovsky D, Inbar Y, Barzilay O (2013) Playing both sides of the market: Success and reciprocity on crowdfunding platforms. Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.