Entry and Subcontracting in Public Procurement Auctions

References

• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albano GL, Spagnolo G, Zanza M (2009) Regulating joint bidding in public procurement. J. Competition Law Econom. 5(2):335–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sappington DEM (2008) The make-or-buy decision in the presence of a rival: Strategic outsourcing to a common supplier. Management Sci. 54(10):1747–1758.Link, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Coey D, Levin J (2013) Set-asides and subsidies in auctions. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 5(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang W-S, Chen B, Salomon TC (2015) An investigation of the average bid mechanism for procurement auctions. Management Sci. 61(6):1237–1254.Link, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Taber CR (2011) Inference with difference in differences with a small number of policy changes. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(1):113–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Decarolis F (2012) Detecting bidders’ groups in collusive auctions. Working paper, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
• Coviello D, Mariniello M (2014) Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. J. Public Econom. 109:76–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Decarolis F (2013) Comparing public procurement auctions. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Decarolis F (2014) Awarding price, contract performance and bids screening: Evidence from procurement auctions. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 6(1):108–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gil R, Marion J (2013) Self-enforcing agreements and relational contracting: Evidence from California highway procurement. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 29(2):239–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Lebrun B (1999) First price auctions with resale. Econom. Lett. 64(2):181–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hafalir I, Krishna V (2008) Asymmetric auctions with resale. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):87–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haile PA (2001) Auctions with resale markets: An application to U.S. forest service timber sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3): 399–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haile PA (2003) Auctions with private uncertainty and resale opportunities. J. Econom. Theory 108(1):72–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jesiorski P, Krasnokutskaya E (2013) Dynamic procurement auctions with subcontracting. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Krasnokutskaya E, Seim K (2011) Bid preference programs and participation in highway procurement auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2653–2686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legros P, Newman AF (2013) A price theory of vertical and lateral integration. Quart. J. Econom. 128(2):725–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin D, Smith JL (1994) Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(3):585–599.Google Scholar
• Marechal F, Morand P-H (2003) Pre vs. post-award subcontracting plans in procurement bidding. Econom. Lett. 81(1):23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marion J (2007) Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions. J. Public Econom. 91(7–8):1591–1624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marion J (2009) How costly is affirmative action? Government contracting and California’s Proposition 209. Rev. Econom. Statist. 91(3):503–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marmer V, Shneyerov A, Xu P (2013) What model for entry in first-price auctions? A nonparametric approach. J. Econometrics 176(1):46–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee PR, McMillan J (1987) Auctions with entry. Econom. Letter 23(4):343–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moretti L, Valbonesi P (2012) Subcontracting in public procurement: An empirical investigation. “Marco Fanno” Working paper 0154, University of Padua, Italy.Google Scholar
• Moszoro MW, Spiller PT (2012) Third-party opportunism and the nature of public contracts. NBER Working paper 18636, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson WF (1985) Competitive bidding with entry costs. Econom. Lett. 17(1–2):53–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spagnolo G, Albano GL, Bianchi M (2006) Bid average methods in procurement. Rivista di Politica Economica 1(2):41–62.Google Scholar
• Spulber DF (1990) Auctions and contract enforcement. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 6(2):325–344.Google Scholar
• Wolfers J (2006) Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5): 1802–1820.Crossref, Google Scholar