Organizational Structure and Product Choice in Knowledge-Intensive Firms

References

• Anderson C, Zeithaml C (1984) Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Acad. Management J. 27(1):5–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Felin T, Nicolai F, Zenger T (2012) Organizational economics of capability and heterogeneity. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1213–1226.Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R, Chang H, Kao Y (2002) Impact of information technology on public accounting firm productivity. J. Inform. System 16(2):209–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2007) How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement and worker skills. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1721–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett V (2013) Organization and bargaining: Sales process choice at auto dealerships. Management Sci. 59(9):2003–2018.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertschek I, Kaiser U (2004) Productivity effects of organizational change: Microeconometric evidence. Management Sci. 50(3):394–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2014) The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Management Sci. 60(12):2859–2885.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M (1994) The firm as a communication network. Quart. J. Econom. 109(4):809–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bower JL (1970) Managing the Resource Allocation Process (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labour: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broderick M (2011) The Art of Managing Professional Services (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Milgrom P (2013) Complementarity in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 11–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA (1983) A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 8(1):61–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caroli E, Van Reenen J (2001) Skill biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1449–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A (1962) Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Coe E (2014) 4 elite New York law firms keep partner ranks lean. Law 360 (March 23), http://www.law360.com/articles/520626/4-elite-new-york-law-firms-keep-partner-ranks-lean.Google Scholar
• Cremer J (1993) Corporate culture and shared knowledge. Indust. Corporate Change 2(1):351–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cremer J, Garicano L, Prat A (2007) Language and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):373–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delong T, Gabarro J, Lees R (2007) When Professionals Have to Lead (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):141–162.Google Scholar
• Foss NJ (2006) Strategy, Economic Organization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Coordination of Firms and Resources (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Garicano L (2000) Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. 108(5):874–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Prat A (2013) Organizational economics with cognitive costs. Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E, eds. Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the Tenth World Congress of the Econometric Society (Cambridge University Press, New York), 342–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garicano L, Wu Y (2012) Knowledge, communication, and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1382–1397.Link, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996a) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996b) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Guadalupe M, Li H, Wulf J (2014) Who lives in the C-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Sci. 60(4):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(2):106–116.Google Scholar
• Hayek F (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. 35(4):519–530.Google Scholar
• Halliday T (1987) Knowledge mandates: Collective influence by scientific, normative and syncretic professions. British J. Sociol. 36(3):421–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson W (2014) From big law to lean law. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. 38:5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrendorf B, Rogerson R, Valentinyi A (2013) Two perspectives on preferences and structural transformation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2752–2789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill CWL, Hoskisson RE (1987) Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Acad. Management Rev. 12(2):331–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofer CW (1975) Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Acad. Management J. 18(4):784–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S (1993) The Origins of Order (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreps D (1990) Corporate culture and economic theory. Alt J, Shepsle K, eds. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 90–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowendahl B (2005) Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms (Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen).Google Scholar
• Maister DH (1993) Managing the Professional Services Firm (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Malhotra N, Morris T (2009) Heterogeneity in professional service firms. J. Management Stud. 46:6:895–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marschak J, Radner R (1972) Economic Theory of Teams (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Miles RE, Snow CC, Meyer AD, Coleman HJ Jr (1977) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):546–562.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(3):511–529.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2–3):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris T, Empson L (1998) Organization and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management in accounting and consulting firms. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 23(5–6):609–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G (2014) Integration and productivity: Satellite-tracked evidence. Management Sci. 60(7):1698–1718.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Sarvary M (2001) Leveraging the customer base: Creating competitive advantage through knowledge management. Management Sci. 47(11):1441–1456.Link, Google Scholar
• Pierce L (2012) Organizational structure and the limits of knowledge sharing: Incentive conflict and agency in car leasing. Management Sci. 58(6):1106–1121.Link, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1958). Personal Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Krudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R (1993) The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica 61(5):1109–1146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ribstein L (2010) The death of big law. Working paper, University of Illinois, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Saloner G (2013) Strategy and organization. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 799–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1974) Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (Division of Research, Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1997) Administrative Behavior, 4th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sloan A (1924) The most important thing I ever learned about management. System: Management Bus. 46(August):137–141.Google Scholar
• Susskind R (2008) The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1982) Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Zandt T (1999) Real-time decentralized information processing as a model of organizations with boundedly rational agents. Rev. Econom. Stud. 66:633–658.Crossref, Google Scholar